Medical Professionalism and Ethics

IF 0.4 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1177/0976500X221111448
M. Desai, Jigar Kapadia
{"title":"Medical Professionalism and Ethics","authors":"M. Desai, Jigar Kapadia","doi":"10.1177/0976500X221111448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Frequent media reports of disputes between medical teachers, resident doctors, and patients have been disturbing thus indicating an increasing gap and decline in the values of the profession. The foundation of medical professionalism and ethics is trust, truth, human values, and strong societal commitment. Our professional responsibilities as medical educators have immediate and long-term impact on the quality of training, patient care, and overall image of the professional group in the society. Formal teaching and training in professionalism and medical ethics that emphasize humanistic aspects and standard of conduct, respectively, are equally essential as biomedical aspects. Interestingly, the principles of medical ethics and attributes of professionalism overlap. However, real-life experiences and complex clinical scenarios place medical educators at the crossroads that contradict their professional commitments resulting in ethical dilemmas. COVID-19 pandemic has further challenged the principles of medical professionalism, especially patient welfare, autonomy, and social justice to prioritize patient care and make tricky decisions based on insufficient resources including withholding and withdrawing potentially lifesaving treatments. Unfortunately, until now the teaching and training in medical professionalism and ethics have remained subtle and medical students learn by chance. The recent introduction of the AETCOM module and Code of Medical Ethics in the curriculum is a ray of hope to brighten the image of medical professionals.","PeriodicalId":16761,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0976500X221111448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Frequent media reports of disputes between medical teachers, resident doctors, and patients have been disturbing thus indicating an increasing gap and decline in the values of the profession. The foundation of medical professionalism and ethics is trust, truth, human values, and strong societal commitment. Our professional responsibilities as medical educators have immediate and long-term impact on the quality of training, patient care, and overall image of the professional group in the society. Formal teaching and training in professionalism and medical ethics that emphasize humanistic aspects and standard of conduct, respectively, are equally essential as biomedical aspects. Interestingly, the principles of medical ethics and attributes of professionalism overlap. However, real-life experiences and complex clinical scenarios place medical educators at the crossroads that contradict their professional commitments resulting in ethical dilemmas. COVID-19 pandemic has further challenged the principles of medical professionalism, especially patient welfare, autonomy, and social justice to prioritize patient care and make tricky decisions based on insufficient resources including withholding and withdrawing potentially lifesaving treatments. Unfortunately, until now the teaching and training in medical professionalism and ethics have remained subtle and medical students learn by chance. The recent introduction of the AETCOM module and Code of Medical Ethics in the curriculum is a ray of hope to brighten the image of medical professionals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗职业道德
媒体频繁报道医学教师、住院医生和病人之间的纠纷,这令人不安,这表明该职业的价值差距越来越大,而且在下降。医疗专业精神和道德的基础是信任、真相、人类价值观和强烈的社会责任感。我们作为医学教育工作者的职业责任对培训质量、患者护理和专业群体在社会中的整体形象具有直接和长期的影响。专业和医学道德方面的正式教学和培训分别强调人文方面和行为标准,与生物医学方面同样重要。有趣的是,医学伦理的原则和专业的属性是重叠的。然而,现实生活中的经验和复杂的临床场景将医学教育者置于与他们的专业承诺相矛盾的十字路口,从而导致道德困境。COVID-19大流行进一步挑战了医疗专业主义原则,特别是患者福利、自主和社会正义原则,即优先考虑患者护理,并在资源不足的情况下做出棘手的决定,包括暂停和撤回可能挽救生命的治疗。遗憾的是,到目前为止,医学专业和道德的教学和培训仍然是微妙的,医学生的学习是偶然的。最近在课程中引入的AETCOM模块和医学道德规范是照亮医疗专业人员形象的希望之光。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
Allelic Variants in the Warfarin-related Genes VKORC1 and CYP2C9 in a Western Saudi Population N-Acetyl-l-Cysteine Ameliorations RenalFunction Early After Renal Ischemia and Reperfusion; it is not Protective over a LongTerm under a High-Sodium Diet in Rats Rationalization of Antibiotic Prescription: Modulation of the Gut Microbiome and Possibilities of Minimizing the Risks for the Development of Antibiotic Resistance—A Narrative Review The Science of Antioxidants: Balancing thePros and Cons for Our Health Use of Fixed-dose Combination Therapy with Remogliflozin and Vildagliptin as an Add-on Drug in Improving the Glycemic Control of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: An Observational Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1