Impact of metformin on clinical outcomes in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Sandra Kang, Lana Khalil, Ashley McCook-Veal, Yuan Liu, John Galvin, Amber Draper, Nima Kokabi, Maria Diab, Walid Shaib, Olatunji Alese, Olumide Gbolahan, Bassel El-Rayes, Mehmet Akce
{"title":"Impact of metformin on clinical outcomes in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors","authors":"Sandra Kang,&nbsp;Lana Khalil,&nbsp;Ashley McCook-Veal,&nbsp;Yuan Liu,&nbsp;John Galvin,&nbsp;Amber Draper,&nbsp;Nima Kokabi,&nbsp;Maria Diab,&nbsp;Walid Shaib,&nbsp;Olatunji Alese,&nbsp;Olumide Gbolahan,&nbsp;Bassel El-Rayes,&nbsp;Mehmet Akce","doi":"10.1002/lci2.71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Aims</h3>\n \n <p>Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a common cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. Emerging data suggests NASH-induced HCC could be associated with less response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy. Metformin has been associated with improved outcomes in cancers like melanoma treated with ICIs, but its impact on HCC is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of metformin on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced HCC treated with ICIs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively analysed patients with advanced HCC treated with ICIs in first and later-line settings between 2015 and 2021. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) as assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1. Patients were stratified based on their usage of metformin.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our study included 18 patients in the metformin group and 93 patients in the non-metformin group. The most common causes of HCC were viral hepatitis (52%), NASH (29%), and alcohol (8%). ORR was 5.6% in the metformin group vs 22.6% in the non-metformin group (<i>P</i> = .0987). Median OS was 10.8 months versus 45.9 months (HR = 1.99, 95% CI = 0.95–4.21, <i>P</i> = .065) and median PFS was 2.5 months versus 6.6 months (<i>P</i> = .077) in the metformin and non-metformin groups, respectively. Regardless of metformin usage, OS was significantly worse in patients with poor ECOG performance status, HCC aetiology of NASH, MELD score 10–23, AFP &gt;= 400, and use of ICIs in later lines of therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Metformin use was associated with a trend, although not statistically significant, toward a worse ORR, OS and PFS in advanced HCC patients treated with ICIs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93331,"journal":{"name":"Liver cancer international","volume":"4 2","pages":"77-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lci2.71","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver cancer international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lci2.71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a common cause of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide. Emerging data suggests NASH-induced HCC could be associated with less response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy. Metformin has been associated with improved outcomes in cancers like melanoma treated with ICIs, but its impact on HCC is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of metformin on clinical outcomes in patients with advanced HCC treated with ICIs.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed patients with advanced HCC treated with ICIs in first and later-line settings between 2015 and 2021. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR) as assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1. Patients were stratified based on their usage of metformin.

Results

Our study included 18 patients in the metformin group and 93 patients in the non-metformin group. The most common causes of HCC were viral hepatitis (52%), NASH (29%), and alcohol (8%). ORR was 5.6% in the metformin group vs 22.6% in the non-metformin group (P = .0987). Median OS was 10.8 months versus 45.9 months (HR = 1.99, 95% CI = 0.95–4.21, P = .065) and median PFS was 2.5 months versus 6.6 months (P = .077) in the metformin and non-metformin groups, respectively. Regardless of metformin usage, OS was significantly worse in patients with poor ECOG performance status, HCC aetiology of NASH, MELD score 10–23, AFP >= 400, and use of ICIs in later lines of therapy.

Conclusions

Metformin use was associated with a trend, although not statistically significant, toward a worse ORR, OS and PFS in advanced HCC patients treated with ICIs.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二甲双胍对免疫检查点抑制剂治疗晚期肝细胞癌临床疗效的影响
非酒精性脂肪性肝炎(NASH)是世界范围内肝细胞癌(HCC)的常见病因。新出现的数据表明,NASH诱导的HCC可能与对基于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的治疗反应较少有关。二甲双胍与ICIs治疗的黑色素瘤等癌症的疗效改善有关,但其对HCC的影响尚不明确。本研究的目的是检验二甲双胍对ICIs治疗的晚期HCC患者临床结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Histology Detection in MASH Cirrhosis for Artificial Intelligence Pathology Platform by Expert Pathologist Training An Insight into the Genetic Predisposition of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease in Africa Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Combined With Immunotherapy for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma-A Review Shared genetic architecture of non-viral cirrhosis with several pleiotropic traits: A nested case-control study in the UK Biobank Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1