County-Level Differences in Support for Recreational Cannabis on the Ballot

IF 2.3 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Contemporary Drug Problems Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1177/0091450920925581
Lindsey Beltz, C. Mosher, J. Schwartz
{"title":"County-Level Differences in Support for Recreational Cannabis on the Ballot","authors":"Lindsey Beltz, C. Mosher, J. Schwartz","doi":"10.1177/0091450920925581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cannabis is traversing an extraordinary journey from an illicit substance to a legal one, due in part to an unprecedented wave of bottom-up law reform through successful citizen ballot initiatives. Yet, even in states that have legalized recreational cannabis, there is substantial geographic variability in support of cannabis legalization. Geographic variability in voter support for cannabis legalization is impactful (e.g., county moratoriums/bans) yet poorly understood. This paper demonstrates the consequences of county-level population demographics, sociopolitical factors, and community differences in experience with criminalization of cannabis possession for understanding county-level variation in support of recreational cannabis law reform on (un)successful ballot measures in California (2010), Colorado (2012), Washington (2012), and Oregon (2014). OLS regression analyses of nearly 200 counties indicate that differences in racial and ethnic composition (% Black, Hispanic), political affiliation (% Republican), past criminalization, gender composition, and higher education level of residents all predict county-level variation in support for liberalization of cannabis law. Stronger Republican political leanings and/or higher percentages of Black or Hispanic residents were associated with reduced support, whereas higher education, male sex composition, and greater past criminalization were associated with increased support for cannabis legalization across counties. Religiosity and rurality were inconsequential as predictors of county-level voting patterns favoring recreational cannabis. The substantial geographic variability in voter support for cannabis legalization has significant implications for policy implementation and effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":35813,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Drug Problems","volume":"47 1","pages":"149 - 164"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0091450920925581","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Drug Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0091450920925581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Cannabis is traversing an extraordinary journey from an illicit substance to a legal one, due in part to an unprecedented wave of bottom-up law reform through successful citizen ballot initiatives. Yet, even in states that have legalized recreational cannabis, there is substantial geographic variability in support of cannabis legalization. Geographic variability in voter support for cannabis legalization is impactful (e.g., county moratoriums/bans) yet poorly understood. This paper demonstrates the consequences of county-level population demographics, sociopolitical factors, and community differences in experience with criminalization of cannabis possession for understanding county-level variation in support of recreational cannabis law reform on (un)successful ballot measures in California (2010), Colorado (2012), Washington (2012), and Oregon (2014). OLS regression analyses of nearly 200 counties indicate that differences in racial and ethnic composition (% Black, Hispanic), political affiliation (% Republican), past criminalization, gender composition, and higher education level of residents all predict county-level variation in support for liberalization of cannabis law. Stronger Republican political leanings and/or higher percentages of Black or Hispanic residents were associated with reduced support, whereas higher education, male sex composition, and greater past criminalization were associated with increased support for cannabis legalization across counties. Religiosity and rurality were inconsequential as predictors of county-level voting patterns favoring recreational cannabis. The substantial geographic variability in voter support for cannabis legalization has significant implications for policy implementation and effectiveness.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在选票上支持休闲大麻的县一级差异
大麻正在经历从非法物质到合法物质的非凡历程,部分原因是通过成功的公民投票倡议,自下而上的法律改革浪潮前所未有。然而,即使在娱乐性大麻合法化的州,支持大麻合法化的地理差异也很大。选民对大麻合法化支持的地理差异是有影响的(例如,县暂停/禁止),但人们知之甚少。本文展示了县级人口统计、社会政治因素和持有大麻定罪经验的社区差异的后果,以了解加利福尼亚州(2010年)、科罗拉多州(2012年)、华盛顿州(2012年)和俄勒冈州(2014年)在支持娱乐性大麻法律改革(不)成功的投票措施方面的县级差异。对近200个县的OLS回归分析表明,种族和民族构成(黑人、西班牙裔百分比)、政治归属(共和党百分比)、过去的犯罪记录、性别构成和居民的高等教育水平的差异,都预测了支持大麻法律自由化的县级差异。更强的共和党政治倾向和/或更高的黑人或西班牙裔居民比例与支持率下降有关,而高等教育、男性性别构成和更多的犯罪前科与各县对大麻合法化的支持率上升有关。宗教虔诚度和乡村性作为县级投票模式支持娱乐性大麻的预测因素并不重要。选民对大麻合法化的支持存在巨大的地域差异,这对政策的执行和有效性具有重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Drug Problems
Contemporary Drug Problems Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Contemporary Drug Problems is a scholarly journal that publishes peer-reviewed social science research on alcohol and other psychoactive drugs, licit and illicit. The journal’s orientation is multidisciplinary and international; it is open to any research paper that contributes to social, cultural, historical or epidemiological knowledge and theory concerning drug use and related problems. While Contemporary Drug Problems publishes all types of social science research on alcohol and other drugs, it recognizes that innovative or challenging research can sometimes struggle to find a suitable outlet. The journal therefore particularly welcomes original studies for which publication options are limited, including historical research, qualitative studies, and policy and legal analyses. In terms of readership, Contemporary Drug Problems serves a burgeoning constituency of social researchers as well as policy makers and practitioners working in health, welfare, social services, public policy, criminal justice and law enforcement.
期刊最新文献
Civil Society Organizations and Harm Reduction Policy: The Mexican Case A Scoping Review of Australian Literature on People Who Use MDMA and Their Harm Reduction Practices Workers with Lived and Living Experience: Characteristics and Wellbeing in the Australian AOD Sector Parental Substance Use as a Child Protection Problem: A Poststructural Interview Analysis The Twin Dangers of Order and Disorder: Rethinking the Relationship Between Movement and Change in Drug Treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1