Sporadic Rectocolic Polyps Prevalence and Management

Q4 Medicine Journal of Coloproctology Pub Date : 2022-08-04 DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1757773
S. Mrabti, A. Sair, A. Benhamdane, T. Addajou, R. Berrida, S. Sentissi, I. Koti, F. Rouibaa, A. Benkirane, H. Seddik
{"title":"Sporadic Rectocolic Polyps Prevalence and Management","authors":"S. Mrabti, A. Sair, A. Benhamdane, T. Addajou, R. Berrida, S. Sentissi, I. Koti, F. Rouibaa, A. Benkirane, H. Seddik","doi":"10.1055/s-0042-1757773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective  To evaluate the prevalence of polyps and their treatments. Materials and Method  This is a retrospective study conducted in our department over 20 years and 3 months between January 2000 and March 2021. All patients with colorectal polyps who underwent endoscopic resection were included. We evaluated the resection techniques and the management of complications. Results  The total number of patients was 273, with a mean age of 57.26 ± 14.058 (18–90) and a M/W sex ratio of 2. The prevalence was 3.35% and the mean number of polyps was 1.33 ± 0.69. The most frequent symptoms were rectal bleeding (23.5%) and constipation (12.1%). The median size was 6 mm (4–12 mm). The left colonic location was the most frequent site (43%). All polyps were classified according to the Paris classification, with a predominance of sessile polyps in 45.75%, followed by pedunculated polyps, representing 42.4%. Endoscopic resection was performed either by biopsy forceps, polypectomy, or mucosectomy in 30.2%, 27.4%, and 25.4% of cases, respectively. Our study noted immediate bleeding in 1.5% of cases, and no perforations or late complications. All complications were treated endoscopically, and no patient required blood transfusion or surgical intervention. Conclusion  Endoscopic resection of rectocolic polyps is the ideal treatment for these lesions. In our department, the prevalence was 3.35%, the most used resection techniques were forceps resection and polypectomy, and the complication rate was 1.5%.","PeriodicalId":15408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Coloproctology","volume":"42 1","pages":"290 - 295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1757773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objective  To evaluate the prevalence of polyps and their treatments. Materials and Method  This is a retrospective study conducted in our department over 20 years and 3 months between January 2000 and March 2021. All patients with colorectal polyps who underwent endoscopic resection were included. We evaluated the resection techniques and the management of complications. Results  The total number of patients was 273, with a mean age of 57.26 ± 14.058 (18–90) and a M/W sex ratio of 2. The prevalence was 3.35% and the mean number of polyps was 1.33 ± 0.69. The most frequent symptoms were rectal bleeding (23.5%) and constipation (12.1%). The median size was 6 mm (4–12 mm). The left colonic location was the most frequent site (43%). All polyps were classified according to the Paris classification, with a predominance of sessile polyps in 45.75%, followed by pedunculated polyps, representing 42.4%. Endoscopic resection was performed either by biopsy forceps, polypectomy, or mucosectomy in 30.2%, 27.4%, and 25.4% of cases, respectively. Our study noted immediate bleeding in 1.5% of cases, and no perforations or late complications. All complications were treated endoscopically, and no patient required blood transfusion or surgical intervention. Conclusion  Endoscopic resection of rectocolic polyps is the ideal treatment for these lesions. In our department, the prevalence was 3.35%, the most used resection techniques were forceps resection and polypectomy, and the complication rate was 1.5%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
散发性直肠息肉的患病率和治疗
抽象目标 评估息肉的患病率及其治疗方法。材料和方法 这是一项在2000年1月至2021年3月期间在我们部门进行的20年零3个月的回顾性研究。所有接受内镜下切除的结直肠息肉患者都包括在内。我们评估了切除技术和并发症的处理。后果 患者总数为273人,平均年龄为57.26岁 ± 14.058(18-90),男女性别比为2。患病率为3.35%,息肉的平均数量为1.33 ± 0.69。最常见的症状是直肠出血(23.5%)和便秘(12.1%)。中位大小为6 毫米(4-12 mm)。左结肠部位是最常见的部位(43%)。所有息肉均按Paris分类,以无柄息肉为主,占45.75%,其次为有蒂息肉,占42.4%。分别有30.2%、27.4%和25.4%的病例通过活检钳、息肉切除术或粘膜切除术进行内镜切除。我们的研究发现,1.5%的病例立即出血,没有穿孔或晚期并发症。所有并发症均经内镜治疗,无需输血或手术干预。结论 内镜下切除直肠结肠息肉是治疗这些病变的理想方法。在我科,患病率为3.35%,最常用的切除技术是钳子切除和息肉切除,并发症发生率为1.5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Coloproctology
Journal of Coloproctology Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
47 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Salvia officinalis in the Treatment of Acetic Acid-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in a Rat Model Unusual Case of Colonic Intussusception Caused by Angiolipoma: Case Report and Literature Review Vegetating Lesions that Appear in the Scar after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Tumors: Tumor Regrowth or Benign Neoplasm? Retrospective Study of Patients Submitted to Appendectomy in a Tertiary Hospital: Is There a Difference between the Public and Supplementary Health System? Pilonidal Sinus of the Anal Canal: A Rare Entity - Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1