A rejoinder to Maarten Lemmens’s paper ‘In defence of frequency generalisations and usage-based linguistics. An answer to Frederick Newmeyer’s “Conversational corpora : when big is beautiful”’

IF 0.1 Q4 LINGUISTICS CogniTextes Pub Date : 2019-06-17 DOI:10.4000/COGNITEXTES.1657
F. Newmeyer
{"title":"A rejoinder to Maarten Lemmens’s paper ‘In defence of frequency generalisations and usage-based linguistics. An answer to Frederick Newmeyer’s “Conversational corpora : when big is beautiful”’","authors":"F. Newmeyer","doi":"10.4000/COGNITEXTES.1657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. Some introductory remarks First, I must express my heart-felt gratitude to Maarten Lemmens for writing a collegial, thought-provoking, and informative reply to my position paper. I learned a great deal from it and can honestly say that if I pursue the issues that I brought up in my piece I will have much recourse to Lemmens’s reply. That said, I found this an extremely difficult rejoinder to write. The reason for my difficulty derives from the great disconnect between the content and claim...","PeriodicalId":53774,"journal":{"name":"CogniTextes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CogniTextes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/COGNITEXTES.1657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1. Some introductory remarks First, I must express my heart-felt gratitude to Maarten Lemmens for writing a collegial, thought-provoking, and informative reply to my position paper. I learned a great deal from it and can honestly say that if I pursue the issues that I brought up in my piece I will have much recourse to Lemmens’s reply. That said, I found this an extremely difficult rejoinder to write. The reason for my difficulty derives from the great disconnect between the content and claim...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对Maarten Lemmens论文“为频率概括和基于用法的语言学辩护”的回应。对弗雷德里克·纽迈耶的《会话语料库:当大的是美的时候》的回答
1.一些介绍性发言首先,我必须衷心感谢马滕·莱门斯对我的立场文件写了一份学院式的、发人深省的、内容丰富的答复。我从中学到了很多,可以诚实地说,如果我继续研究我在文章中提出的问题,我会非常求助于莱门斯的回复。也就是说,我发现这是一个极其困难的反驳。我遇到困难的原因是内容和声明之间的巨大脱节。。。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CogniTextes
CogniTextes LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigating English clippings experimentally: Why markedness is always local: the case of Russian aspect Bounding in French and Romance Probing the role of bounding, definiteness and other factors: bare noun and determiner use in Guianese French Creole Reference, Deixis and Perspective.Aspectual Readings of Italian Ecco- and French
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1