Interior Resistance

IF 1.2 2区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE Journal of Interior Design Pub Date : 2021-02-10 DOI:10.1111/joid.12193
Rod Adams Ph.D., Andy Milligan B.A., Nigel Simpkins M.A.
{"title":"Interior Resistance","authors":"Rod Adams Ph.D.,&nbsp;Andy Milligan B.A.,&nbsp;Nigel Simpkins M.A.","doi":"10.1111/joid.12193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The interior frequently masquerades a resistance to being clean, often demonstrating different levels of hygiene, containment, and control. Yet, it is the-body-inside that simultaneously resists and distributes infection within the mineral contexts of the building. Ever since Van Leeuwenhoek's (1993) discovery of a strange microbial world of bacteria and protozoa, societal, bodily, and spatial interpretations of clean have shifted. Evolving levels of cleanliness continually reposition the interior to become progressively more visually hygienic and meticulously super-clean. While medical need often leads and intensifies infection control, it is personal fastidiousness, compulsion, and media image that shape human attitudes and cultures to grime and dirt. Historically, “homes-of-the-future” reinforce a technologically sanitized prototype, a strain of which persists in the sterility of the ordered “show-home.” Each avoids the pathogenic realities of the-body-inside revealing esthetic traces of the Modernist ideals of clean lines and clean living that recur in contemporary images of minimal occupation. As we move to develop new hyper-clean and locked-down pandemic-proof interiors capable of immunizing and shielding occupants, this paper re-evaluates what it means to be clean and how the interior helps to resist and mediate these efforts. As concerns over antimicrobial resistance and interior <i>touching</i> increases, our protection from allergy, disease, and contagion are changing. The interior is increasingly playing a critical role in arbitrating biological infection, either through intelligent cleaning systems, infrastructure, or material science. This paper sets out the existing resistance to, and the conditions for, a new <i>clean</i> interior and posits where and what the future might conceive, including the advancement of immunology by reintroducing “dirt” back into interiors (mirroring Edward Jenner's deliberate infection of humans to develop resistance to smallpox) enabling better biological resistant to the outside world.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":56199,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interior Design","volume":"46 1","pages":"11-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/joid.12193","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interior Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joid.12193","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The interior frequently masquerades a resistance to being clean, often demonstrating different levels of hygiene, containment, and control. Yet, it is the-body-inside that simultaneously resists and distributes infection within the mineral contexts of the building. Ever since Van Leeuwenhoek's (1993) discovery of a strange microbial world of bacteria and protozoa, societal, bodily, and spatial interpretations of clean have shifted. Evolving levels of cleanliness continually reposition the interior to become progressively more visually hygienic and meticulously super-clean. While medical need often leads and intensifies infection control, it is personal fastidiousness, compulsion, and media image that shape human attitudes and cultures to grime and dirt. Historically, “homes-of-the-future” reinforce a technologically sanitized prototype, a strain of which persists in the sterility of the ordered “show-home.” Each avoids the pathogenic realities of the-body-inside revealing esthetic traces of the Modernist ideals of clean lines and clean living that recur in contemporary images of minimal occupation. As we move to develop new hyper-clean and locked-down pandemic-proof interiors capable of immunizing and shielding occupants, this paper re-evaluates what it means to be clean and how the interior helps to resist and mediate these efforts. As concerns over antimicrobial resistance and interior touching increases, our protection from allergy, disease, and contagion are changing. The interior is increasingly playing a critical role in arbitrating biological infection, either through intelligent cleaning systems, infrastructure, or material science. This paper sets out the existing resistance to, and the conditions for, a new clean interior and posits where and what the future might conceive, including the advancement of immunology by reintroducing “dirt” back into interiors (mirroring Edward Jenner's deliberate infection of humans to develop resistance to smallpox) enabling better biological resistant to the outside world.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内部阻力
内部经常表现出对清洁的抗拒,通常表现出不同程度的卫生、密封和控制。然而,它是内部的身体,同时在建筑的矿物环境中抵抗和分配感染。自从列文虎克(Van Leeuwenhoek, 1993)发现了一个由细菌和原生动物组成的奇怪微生物世界以来,社会、身体和空间对清洁的解释发生了变化。不断发展的清洁水平不断重新定位内部,使其在视觉上逐渐变得更加卫生和一丝不苟的超级清洁。虽然医疗需求经常导致并加强感染控制,但个人的挑剔、强迫和媒体形象塑造了人类对污垢和污垢的态度和文化。从历史上看,“未来之家”强化了一种经过技术净化的原型,其中一种延续在有序的“展示之家”的贫瘠中。每个人都避免了身体内部的致病现实,揭示了现代主义理想的干净线条和干净生活的美学痕迹,这些在当代最小占用的图像中反复出现。随着我们开始开发新的超清洁和封闭的防流行病内饰,能够对居住者进行免疫和屏蔽,本文重新评估了清洁的含义,以及内饰如何帮助抵抗和调解这些努力。随着对抗菌素耐药性和内部接触的担忧增加,我们对过敏、疾病和传染病的保护正在发生变化。无论是通过智能清洁系统、基础设施还是材料科学,室内在仲裁生物感染方面发挥着越来越重要的作用。这篇论文阐述了现有的对新的清洁内部的抵抗力和条件,并提出了未来可能设想的地方和情况,包括通过将“污垢”重新引入内部(反映爱德华詹纳故意感染人类以产生对天花的抵抗力)从而提高对外部世界的生物抵抗力的免疫学进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
30.80%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interior Design is a scholarly, refereed publication dedicated to issues related to the design of the interior environment. Scholarly inquiry representing the entire spectrum of interior design theory, research, education and practice is invited. Submissions are encouraged from educators, designers, anthropologists, architects, historians, psychologists, sociologists, or others interested in interior design.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Gender in Classrooms and Associated Expectations of Belonging Interior Race Theory: Using Interior Objects to Resist Harmful Racial Conditioning The Master’s Tools, or, Tearing Down the Goat House From Within Measure and Mis-Measure: Rethinking Anthropometry in Interior Design Identifying Environmental Elements and Attributes that Contribute to Indoor Wayfinding: An Exploratory Study Utilizing Think-Aloud Protocol
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1