Bedside Rules for Managing Acid-Base Derangement in Respiratory Failure: Applications to COVID-19

M. Marano, Luigi Senigalliesi
{"title":"Bedside Rules for Managing Acid-Base Derangement in Respiratory Failure: Applications to COVID-19","authors":"M. Marano, Luigi Senigalliesi","doi":"10.1097/CPM.0000000000000354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Respiratory failure is typically associated with changes in pCO2leading to respiratory alkalosis (type 1 failure) and respiratory acidosis (type 2). As a compensatory response, plasma HCO3concentration decreases if pCO2decreases and increases conversely. These secondary responses prevent large pH fluctuations. However, metabolic acid-base disorders may still occur as a consequence of dysfunction of other organs and/or medical treatments. To recognize superimposed acid-base disorders, the availability of an accurate prediction of the expected HCO3that corresponds to a given pCO2is crucial. In chronic hypocapnia, the compensatory metabolic response is regulated by the equation ΔHCO3/ΔpCO2=0.4 mEq/L per mm Hg. An easy rule to compute the expected value of HCO3may be 0.4×pCO2+9. In chronic hypercapnia, the equation is ΔHCO3/ΔpCO2=0.48 mEq/L per mm Hg, and the expected value of HCO3becomes 0.48×pCO2+4.74. While this expression is accurate, it seems to be of limited use for simple \"bedside\" predictions. In this contribution, we propose the simpler expression: the expected value of HCO3in chronic hypercapnia=½ pCO2+3.5. For values of pCO2not exceeding 70 mm Hg, with the proposed expression, the difference in HCO3prediction in respect to the previous one is <0.5 mEq/L, which is clinically negligible. The root mean square value of the error introduced by the proposed expression is as small as 0.19 mEq/L. Because of its accuracy, we believe that the proposed formula may be useful to identify mixed disorders at the bedside in a simpler way.","PeriodicalId":10393,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pulmonary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/CPM.0000000000000354","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CPM.0000000000000354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Respiratory failure is typically associated with changes in pCO2leading to respiratory alkalosis (type 1 failure) and respiratory acidosis (type 2). As a compensatory response, plasma HCO3concentration decreases if pCO2decreases and increases conversely. These secondary responses prevent large pH fluctuations. However, metabolic acid-base disorders may still occur as a consequence of dysfunction of other organs and/or medical treatments. To recognize superimposed acid-base disorders, the availability of an accurate prediction of the expected HCO3that corresponds to a given pCO2is crucial. In chronic hypocapnia, the compensatory metabolic response is regulated by the equation ΔHCO3/ΔpCO2=0.4 mEq/L per mm Hg. An easy rule to compute the expected value of HCO3may be 0.4×pCO2+9. In chronic hypercapnia, the equation is ΔHCO3/ΔpCO2=0.48 mEq/L per mm Hg, and the expected value of HCO3becomes 0.48×pCO2+4.74. While this expression is accurate, it seems to be of limited use for simple "bedside" predictions. In this contribution, we propose the simpler expression: the expected value of HCO3in chronic hypercapnia=½ pCO2+3.5. For values of pCO2not exceeding 70 mm Hg, with the proposed expression, the difference in HCO3prediction in respect to the previous one is <0.5 mEq/L, which is clinically negligible. The root mean square value of the error introduced by the proposed expression is as small as 0.19 mEq/L. Because of its accuracy, we believe that the proposed formula may be useful to identify mixed disorders at the bedside in a simpler way.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
处理呼吸衰竭患者酸碱紊乱的床边规则:在COVID-19中的应用
呼吸衰竭通常与pco2的变化相关,导致呼吸性碱中毒(1型衰竭)和呼吸性酸中毒(2型)。作为一种代偿反应,血浆hco3浓度随着pco2的降低而降低,反之则升高。这些次生反应防止了pH值的大波动。然而,代谢性酸碱紊乱仍可能由于其他器官功能障碍和/或药物治疗而发生。为了识别叠加的酸碱失调,准确预测与给定pco2对应的预期hco3是至关重要的。在慢性低碳酸血症中,代偿代谢反应由方程ΔHCO3/ΔpCO2=0.4 mEq/L / mm Hg调节。计算hco3期望值的简单规则为0.4×pCO2+9。慢性高碳酸血症方程为ΔHCO3/ΔpCO2=0.48 mEq/L / mm Hg, hco3期望值为0.48×pCO2+4.74。虽然这种表达是准确的,但对于简单的“床边”预测,它的用途似乎有限。在这篇文章中,我们提出了一个更简单的表达式:慢性高碳酸血症中hco3的期望值=½pCO2+3.5。对于不超过70 mm Hg的pco2值,采用本文提出的表达,hco3预测值与之前的预测值的差异<0.5 mEq/L,在临床上可以忽略不计。该表达式引入的误差均方根值小至0.19 mEq/L。由于其准确性,我们相信所提出的公式可能有助于以更简单的方式识别床边的混合性疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Pulmonary Medicine
Clinical Pulmonary Medicine Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Pulmonary Medicine provides a forum for the discussion of important new knowledge in the field of pulmonary medicine that is of interest and relevance to the practitioner. This goal is achieved through mini-reviews on focused sub-specialty topics in areas covered within the journal. These areas include: Obstructive Airways Disease; Respiratory Infections; Interstitial, Inflammatory, and Occupational Diseases; Clinical Practice Management; Critical Care/Respiratory Care; Colleagues in Respiratory Medicine; and Topics in Respiratory Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Systemic sclerosis associated myopathy: how to treat. Axillary lymphadenopathy in a high-risk breast screening patient following the COVID-19 vaccine: a diagnostic conundrum. Is a Trial of Observation Safer Than Intervention With Spontaneous Pneumothorax? The Complex Relationship Between Poor Sleep Quality and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease The Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis and the Role of Lung Biopsy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1