“Spying for the People”: surveillance, democracy and the impasse of cynical reason

Michael Kaplan
{"title":"“Spying for the People”: surveillance, democracy and the impasse of cynical reason","authors":"Michael Kaplan","doi":"10.18573/JOMEC.165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay examines the Snowden affair as a sort of Rorschach test that traces the contours of what I am calling the impasse of cynical reason. In particular, I contend that the emerging form of algorithmic dataveillance both elicits and actively thwarts theoretical and critical approaches predicated on an a normative, symbolic model of epistemology that this form aspires to supplant. As a result, what such approaches tend to discern in the emerging culture of surveillance are its own epistemological commitments—the very ones comprising the impasse of cynical reason. Breaking out of this impasse will thus require disrupting the deep, hidden complicity of such critique with its ostensible object. I contend that this will require taking seriously the often disingenuous or fallacious arguments on behalf of dataveillance in order to overcome the critical resistance to the quite genuine eventuality they connote—that of the decline of cynical reason as the prevailing form of social coordination.","PeriodicalId":87289,"journal":{"name":"JOMEC journal : journalism, media and cultural studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOMEC journal : journalism, media and cultural studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18573/JOMEC.165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This essay examines the Snowden affair as a sort of Rorschach test that traces the contours of what I am calling the impasse of cynical reason. In particular, I contend that the emerging form of algorithmic dataveillance both elicits and actively thwarts theoretical and critical approaches predicated on an a normative, symbolic model of epistemology that this form aspires to supplant. As a result, what such approaches tend to discern in the emerging culture of surveillance are its own epistemological commitments—the very ones comprising the impasse of cynical reason. Breaking out of this impasse will thus require disrupting the deep, hidden complicity of such critique with its ostensible object. I contend that this will require taking seriously the often disingenuous or fallacious arguments on behalf of dataveillance in order to overcome the critical resistance to the quite genuine eventuality they connote—that of the decline of cynical reason as the prevailing form of social coordination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《为人民监视》:监视、民主和愤世嫉俗的理性的僵局
本文将斯诺登事件作为一种罗夏墨迹测试(Rorschach test)来考察,它追溯了我所谓的愤世嫉俗理性僵局的轮廓。特别是,我认为算法数据监控的新形式既引出又积极地阻碍了理论和批判方法,这些方法基于一种规范的、符号的认识论模型,这种形式渴望取代。因此,这些方法往往在新兴的监控文化中辨别出它自己的认识论承诺——正是这些承诺构成了玩世不恭的理性的僵局。因此,要打破这种僵局,就需要打破这种批评与表面上的对象之间的深刻的、隐藏的共谋。我认为,这需要我们认真对待那些支持数据监控的往往不诚实或谬误的论点,以克服对它们所隐含的真实可能性的批判性抵制——即愤世嫉俗的理性作为主流社会协调形式的衰落。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Second-hand Cultures in Unsettled Times Taking stock: Continuity and change in charity retail Second-hand and the Tacit Emptying the Wardrobe, Clearing the House: A Microcosmic View into the Creation and Destruction of Clothing Value Pricing up & Haggling Down: Value Negotiations in the UK Charity Shop
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1