Annibale Riccò and the catoptric proof of the Earth’s curvature

IF 0.3 3区 哲学 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Journal for the History of Astronomy Pub Date : 2022-02-01 DOI:10.1177/00218286211049617
P. F. Nali
{"title":"Annibale Riccò and the catoptric proof of the Earth’s curvature","authors":"P. F. Nali","doi":"10.1177/00218286211049617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phenomena as common as the daily rising or setting of the Sun can reveal, upon careful examination, something surprising and unexpected, which has been attracting scientific attention belatedly and had to wait long before being explained. From systematic observation of sunrises over the marine horizon, the Italian astronomer Annibale Riccò (1844–1919) unexpectedly claimed to have recognized a new and novel evidence of the Earth’s roundness, scrutinizing distorted images of the Sun reflected off waters. Others had previously come to a similar conclusion, but it was Riccò’s pioneering work that brought this “catoptric” proof of the Earth’s curvature to the scientific limelight of his time. The interesting debate ensued gave rise to more articulated interpretations of Riccò’s observations, including recovery of olden “dioptric” explanations. The catoptric model was eventually abandoned, as it does not adequately take into account the effects of atmospheric refraction and above all the observed phenomenon is not genuinely “reflective.” The argument is nevertheless correct in principle and retains historical and pedagogical interest.","PeriodicalId":56280,"journal":{"name":"Journal for the History of Astronomy","volume":"53 1","pages":"88 - 119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for the History of Astronomy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00218286211049617","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Phenomena as common as the daily rising or setting of the Sun can reveal, upon careful examination, something surprising and unexpected, which has been attracting scientific attention belatedly and had to wait long before being explained. From systematic observation of sunrises over the marine horizon, the Italian astronomer Annibale Riccò (1844–1919) unexpectedly claimed to have recognized a new and novel evidence of the Earth’s roundness, scrutinizing distorted images of the Sun reflected off waters. Others had previously come to a similar conclusion, but it was Riccò’s pioneering work that brought this “catoptric” proof of the Earth’s curvature to the scientific limelight of his time. The interesting debate ensued gave rise to more articulated interpretations of Riccò’s observations, including recovery of olden “dioptric” explanations. The catoptric model was eventually abandoned, as it does not adequately take into account the effects of atmospheric refraction and above all the observed phenomenon is not genuinely “reflective.” The argument is nevertheless correct in principle and retains historical and pedagogical interest.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Annibale Riccó与地球曲率的光学证明
像太阳每天升起或落下这样常见的现象,经过仔细研究,可以揭示出一些令人惊讶和意想不到的事情,这些事情引起了科学界的关注,但为时已晚,必须等待很长时间才能得到解释。意大利天文学家Annibale Riccå(1844-1919)通过对海洋地平线上日出的系统观测,出人意料地声称自己发现了地球圆度的一个新的新颖证据,仔细观察了海水反射的太阳扭曲图像。其他人此前也得出了类似的结论,但正是Riccå的开创性工作,将这一地球曲率的“猫眼”证明带到了他那个时代的科学聚光灯下。随后发生的有趣的辩论引发了对Riccå的观察结果的更清晰的解释,包括恢复旧的“屈光”解释。Catoptic模型最终被放弃,因为它没有充分考虑到大气折射的影响,而且最重要的是,观察到的现象并不是真正的“反射性的”。然而,这一论点在原则上是正确的,并保留了历史和教学的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for the History of Astronomy
Journal for the History of Astronomy 地学天文-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Science History Publications Ltd is an academic publishing company established in 1971 and based in Cambridge, England. We specialize in journals in history of science and in particular history of astronomy.
期刊最新文献
Plato and planetary order: Uncertainty in the positions of Mercury and Venus The solar eclipse of A.D. 1221 May 23 and the value of ΔT Physicists becoming astronomers Present status of UBAI plate archive A Ptolemaic lunar model of the 17th century: François Viète and his first lunar model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1