Missing the Mark?

Q3 Social Sciences Advances in social work Pub Date : 2023-03-22 DOI:10.18060/25748
Dawn Apgar, Mackaully Parada
{"title":"Missing the Mark?","authors":"Dawn Apgar, Mackaully Parada","doi":"10.18060/25748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2021 revision to the ethical code for social workers mandated engagement in self-care. A review of workforce data suggests that the need for self-care in social work is largely due to poor working conditions, inadequate pay, unavailability of quality supervision, and lack of professional recognition. Thus, making self-care largely a personal responsibility is adopting a “blaming the victim” mentality that the profession has historically rejected in its approach to client problems. Social work is rooted in examining the social conditions of people within their environments and focusing on making macro level changes to remedy systemic problems. Though not intentional, the ethical mandate for social workers to remedy the stress, trauma, and burnout resulting from environmental stressors is misplaced, though not surprising. In recent years, social workers have focused more on working with individuals to fix their problems rather than making contextual changes that are largely responsible for the ills. This article reframes the emotional and psychological problems experienced by social workers as a social justice issue, requiring mezzo and macro, rather than micro, level intervention. Embracing this alternative perspective requires a commitment to mobilization, advocacy, and political engagement—approaches that have been deprioritized by many within the social work profession.","PeriodicalId":7430,"journal":{"name":"Advances in social work","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/25748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The 2021 revision to the ethical code for social workers mandated engagement in self-care. A review of workforce data suggests that the need for self-care in social work is largely due to poor working conditions, inadequate pay, unavailability of quality supervision, and lack of professional recognition. Thus, making self-care largely a personal responsibility is adopting a “blaming the victim” mentality that the profession has historically rejected in its approach to client problems. Social work is rooted in examining the social conditions of people within their environments and focusing on making macro level changes to remedy systemic problems. Though not intentional, the ethical mandate for social workers to remedy the stress, trauma, and burnout resulting from environmental stressors is misplaced, though not surprising. In recent years, social workers have focused more on working with individuals to fix their problems rather than making contextual changes that are largely responsible for the ills. This article reframes the emotional and psychological problems experienced by social workers as a social justice issue, requiring mezzo and macro, rather than micro, level intervention. Embracing this alternative perspective requires a commitment to mobilization, advocacy, and political engagement—approaches that have been deprioritized by many within the social work profession.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
没有击中目标?
2021年修订的社会工作者道德准则要求参与自我照顾。对劳动力数据的回顾表明,社会工作中自我照顾的需求主要是由于工作条件差、工资不足、缺乏质量监督和缺乏专业认可。因此,让自我照顾在很大程度上成为一种个人责任,是在采取一种“指责受害者”的心态,这是该行业历来在处理客户问题时所拒绝的。社会工作根植于检查人们在其环境中的社会状况,并专注于宏观层面的改变,以纠正系统性问题。虽然不是有意为之,但社会工作者纠正环境压力因素造成的压力、创伤和倦怠的道德要求是错误的,尽管这并不奇怪。近年来,社会工作者更多地关注与个人一起解决他们的问题,而不是改变环境,这在很大程度上是造成疾病的原因。本文将社会工作者所经历的情感和心理问题重新定义为一个社会正义问题,需要中观和宏观层面的干预,而不是微观层面的干预。接受这种替代观点需要致力于动员、倡导和政治参与——这些方法在社会工作专业中被许多人忽略了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in social work
Advances in social work Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Beyond Limits Firearm Access and Safe Storage Grassroots Activism Impacting Rural LGBTQIA+ Communities Examining the Views of Master of Social Work (MSW) Graduates on the Grand Challenges for Social Work and Society Special Section Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1