Definition-specific prevalence estimates for sarcopenia in an Australian population: the Geelong Osteoporosis Study

Sophia X. Sui, Kara L. Holloway-Kew, Natalie K. Hyde, Lana J. Williams, Monica C. Tembo, Sarah Leach, Julie A. Pasco
{"title":"Definition-specific prevalence estimates for sarcopenia in an Australian population: the Geelong Osteoporosis Study","authors":"Sophia X. Sui,&nbsp;Kara L. Holloway-Kew,&nbsp;Natalie K. Hyde,&nbsp;Lana J. Williams,&nbsp;Monica C. Tembo,&nbsp;Sarah Leach,&nbsp;Julie A. Pasco","doi":"10.1002/crt2.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>We aimed to compare prevalence estimates for sarcopenia in an Australian sample of older men and women by using different criteria.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Women (<i>n</i> = 323) and men (<i>n</i> = 342) aged 60–96 years from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study were included. Handgrip strength (HGS) was measured by dynamometer (Jamar or Vernier) and appendicular lean mass (ALM) by whole-body densitometry (Lunar). Sarcopenia definitions included European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) 1, EWGSOP2, and US Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH). Sarcopenia was identified as low HGS and low ALM/height<sup>2</sup> or low muscle performance, and low HGS and low ALM/body mass index (BMI). Prevalence estimates were standardized to the Australian population and agreement between definitions assessed using the Cohen kappa statistic (<i>κ</i>).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Low HGS was identified in 13.7–29.9% of women and 2.1–14.1% of men. Low ALM/height<sup>2</sup> was identified in 7.1–11.8% of women and 6.0–8.4% of men, while 21.7% of women and 21.1% of men had low ALM/BMI. Mean age-standardized prevalence estimates for sarcopenia were 5.9% (95% confidence interval 3.4–8.4) for women and 2.9% (1.9–4.0) for men (EWGSOP1), 2.3% (1.1–3.4) for women and 0.5% (0.2–0.9) for men (EWGSOP2), and 4.0% (2.1–5.8) for women and 1.1% (0.6–1.5) for men (FNIH). There was moderate agreement between EWGSOP1 and EWGSOP2 (<i>κ</i> = 0.58 women, 0.30 men) and poor agreement between FNIH and EWGSOP1 (<i>κ</i> = 0.16 women, 0.12 men) and EWGSOP2 (<i>κ</i> = 0.19 women, 0 men).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Sarcopenia prevalence differed according to definition applied. Point estimates for sarcopenia prevalence according to EWGSOP2 identified fewer individuals than EWGSOP1, with FNIH estimates between the two; however, there were overlapping 95% confidence intervals across definitions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73543,"journal":{"name":"JCSM clinical reports","volume":"5 4","pages":"89-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/crt2.22","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCSM clinical reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/crt2.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Background

We aimed to compare prevalence estimates for sarcopenia in an Australian sample of older men and women by using different criteria.

Methods

Women (n = 323) and men (n = 342) aged 60–96 years from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study were included. Handgrip strength (HGS) was measured by dynamometer (Jamar or Vernier) and appendicular lean mass (ALM) by whole-body densitometry (Lunar). Sarcopenia definitions included European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) 1, EWGSOP2, and US Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH). Sarcopenia was identified as low HGS and low ALM/height2 or low muscle performance, and low HGS and low ALM/body mass index (BMI). Prevalence estimates were standardized to the Australian population and agreement between definitions assessed using the Cohen kappa statistic (κ).

Results

Low HGS was identified in 13.7–29.9% of women and 2.1–14.1% of men. Low ALM/height2 was identified in 7.1–11.8% of women and 6.0–8.4% of men, while 21.7% of women and 21.1% of men had low ALM/BMI. Mean age-standardized prevalence estimates for sarcopenia were 5.9% (95% confidence interval 3.4–8.4) for women and 2.9% (1.9–4.0) for men (EWGSOP1), 2.3% (1.1–3.4) for women and 0.5% (0.2–0.9) for men (EWGSOP2), and 4.0% (2.1–5.8) for women and 1.1% (0.6–1.5) for men (FNIH). There was moderate agreement between EWGSOP1 and EWGSOP2 (κ = 0.58 women, 0.30 men) and poor agreement between FNIH and EWGSOP1 (κ = 0.16 women, 0.12 men) and EWGSOP2 (κ = 0.19 women, 0 men).

Conclusions

Sarcopenia prevalence differed according to definition applied. Point estimates for sarcopenia prevalence according to EWGSOP2 identified fewer individuals than EWGSOP1, with FNIH estimates between the two; however, there were overlapping 95% confidence intervals across definitions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚人群中少肌症的定义特异性患病率估计:吉隆骨质疏松症研究
我们的目的是通过使用不同的标准来比较澳大利亚老年男性和女性样本中少肌症的患病率估计值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Predictive influence of artificial intelligence-based body composition analysis in trauma patients with pelvic injuries Issue Information A review of radiological definitions of sarcopenia in cancer The impact of low muscle mass on prognosis following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1