'All the Truth I Could Tell': A Discussion of Title VII's Potential Impact on Systemic Entertainment Industry Victimization

N. Breeland
{"title":"'All the Truth I Could Tell': A Discussion of Title VII's Potential Impact on Systemic Entertainment Industry Victimization","authors":"N. Breeland","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3106284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Breeland, Nikki R. | Abstract: There has been a distinct rise in sexual assault allegations within the entertainment industry in recent years. The culture of the industry, the nature of entertainment contracts, and the abuse of the nondisclosure agreement are to blame for this rampant abuse of vulnerable entertainers. This Article focuses on the contractual prisons in which sexually abused entertainers find themselves when they attempt to part ways with their employers. Using prevailing equitable remedies in conjunction with the feminist contract theory of context and subjectivity can help alleviate some of the pressure on abused entertainers attempting to “breach” their contracts. While Title VII has been used in the employment law context, it has yet to be applied in the context of entertainment contracts. Using this novel approach, Title VII can put entertainment-based employers on the defensive by allowing intentional sexual torts to count as the first contract breach. One thing is for certain: something must be done to combat this culture of sexual assault within the entertainment industry.[1] [1]. “The recent revelations have proven that society must examine the persistent sexual harassment issue that has plagued women in some of the country’s most important industries. The first step to tackling the problem, though, must be addressing the contractual traps that are used to silence women and obscure the pattern of abuse. This Article uses feminist legal theory to shift the conversation, challenging how we’re characterizing ‘wrongdoing’ and ‘breaches.’ It is an important contribution to a vital national conversation.” Statement by Stacey Lantagne, Professor of Law, University of Mississippi School of Law, Oxford, Mississippi (Jan. 24, 2018).","PeriodicalId":83388,"journal":{"name":"UCLA women's law journal","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UCLA women's law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3106284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Author(s): Breeland, Nikki R. | Abstract: There has been a distinct rise in sexual assault allegations within the entertainment industry in recent years. The culture of the industry, the nature of entertainment contracts, and the abuse of the nondisclosure agreement are to blame for this rampant abuse of vulnerable entertainers. This Article focuses on the contractual prisons in which sexually abused entertainers find themselves when they attempt to part ways with their employers. Using prevailing equitable remedies in conjunction with the feminist contract theory of context and subjectivity can help alleviate some of the pressure on abused entertainers attempting to “breach” their contracts. While Title VII has been used in the employment law context, it has yet to be applied in the context of entertainment contracts. Using this novel approach, Title VII can put entertainment-based employers on the defensive by allowing intentional sexual torts to count as the first contract breach. One thing is for certain: something must be done to combat this culture of sexual assault within the entertainment industry.[1] [1]. “The recent revelations have proven that society must examine the persistent sexual harassment issue that has plagued women in some of the country’s most important industries. The first step to tackling the problem, though, must be addressing the contractual traps that are used to silence women and obscure the pattern of abuse. This Article uses feminist legal theory to shift the conversation, challenging how we’re characterizing ‘wrongdoing’ and ‘breaches.’ It is an important contribution to a vital national conversation.” Statement by Stacey Lantagne, Professor of Law, University of Mississippi School of Law, Oxford, Mississippi (Jan. 24, 2018).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我能说的所有真相”:讨论第七章对系统性娱乐业受害者化的潜在影响
作者:Breeland,Nikki R.|摘要:近年来,娱乐业中的性侵指控明显增多。该行业的文化、娱乐合同的性质以及对保密协议的滥用是虐待弱势艺人的猖獗原因。这篇文章的重点是合同监狱,性虐待艺人在试图与雇主分道扬镳时会发现自己身处其中。结合语境和主体性的女权主义契约理论,使用普遍的公平补救措施可以帮助减轻试图“违反”合同的受虐艺人的一些压力。虽然第七章已在就业法中使用,但尚未在娱乐合同中应用。利用这种新颖的方法,第七章可以将故意性侵权行为视为第一次违约,从而使以娱乐为基础的雇主处于守势。有一点是肯定的:必须采取措施打击娱乐业中的这种性侵文化。[1] [1]。“最近的爆料证明,社会必须审视困扰该国一些最重要行业女性的持续性骚扰问题。然而,解决这个问题的第一步必须是解决用来让女性沉默和掩盖虐待模式的合同陷阱。这篇文章利用女权主义法律理论来转移话题,挑战我们如何定性“不法行为”和“违规行为”这是对重要的全国对话的重要贡献。”密西西比州牛津市密西西比大学法学院法学教授Stacey Lantagne的声明(2018年1月24日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What's Love Got to Do with It? Anti-Love Jihad Laws and the Othering of Muslims in India Self-Defense, Responsibility, and Punishment: Rethinking the Criminalization of Women Who Kill Their Abusive Intimate Partners Stolen Voices: A Linguistic Approach to Understanding Implicit Gender Bias in the Legal Profession Limitations of Current Menstrual Equity Advocacy and a Path Towards Justice Black Women Victims of Police Brutality and the Silencing of Their Stories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1