Conservation efficiency and nutritive value of silages made from grass-red clover and multi-species swards compared with grass monocultures

IF 0.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research Pub Date : 2021-01-11 DOI:10.15212/IJAFR-2020-0110
T. Moloney, H. Sheridan, James Grant, E. O'Riordan, P. O'kiely
{"title":"Conservation efficiency and nutritive value of silages made from grass-red clover and multi-species swards compared with grass monocultures","authors":"T. Moloney, H. Sheridan, James Grant, E. O'Riordan, P. O'kiely","doi":"10.15212/IJAFR-2020-0110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nBinary grass-clover and multi-species swards can increase herbage yields or facilitate reduced inputs of inorganic fertiliser nitrogen (N) compared with perennial ryegrass monocultures. However, the efficiency of the ensilage process and the nutritive value of silage produced from multi-species swards has not been documented. Replicate samples from grass-red clover binary mixture and multi-species mixture swards were ensiled in laboratory silos to assess the ensilability, fermentation characteristics, conservation losses and silage nutritive value compared with grass monocultures produced using inorganic N fertiliser. The results suggest that assessment of the ensilability and subsequent ensilage characteristics of binary and multi-species mixtures should be based on direct sampling from such mixtures rather than being predicted from values obtained from monocultures of constituent species. Under favourable ensiling conditions, unwilted binary mixtures and multi-species mixtures are satisfactorily preserved as silage, comparable to a perennial ryegrass monoculture receiving inorganic N fertiliser. However, when ensiled under more challenging crop conditions the mixtures exhibited a greater requirement for their preservation to be aided, compared with the perennial ryegrass monoculture. Despite the application of inorganic N reducing the legume content of multi-species mixture swards, it had relatively little effect on herbage ensilability or silage preservation. For all species treatments, silage nutritive values were primarily dependent on the pre-ensiling values, although herbage digestibility values declined during ensilage where the ensilage process was inefficient. The current study suggests that in order to be satisfactorily preserved as silage, binary grass-clover and multi-species swards have a greater requirement for an adequate rapid field wilt and/or effective preservative application compared with perennial ryegrass produced using inorganic fertiliser N.","PeriodicalId":14659,"journal":{"name":"Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15212/IJAFR-2020-0110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Binary grass-clover and multi-species swards can increase herbage yields or facilitate reduced inputs of inorganic fertiliser nitrogen (N) compared with perennial ryegrass monocultures. However, the efficiency of the ensilage process and the nutritive value of silage produced from multi-species swards has not been documented. Replicate samples from grass-red clover binary mixture and multi-species mixture swards were ensiled in laboratory silos to assess the ensilability, fermentation characteristics, conservation losses and silage nutritive value compared with grass monocultures produced using inorganic N fertiliser. The results suggest that assessment of the ensilability and subsequent ensilage characteristics of binary and multi-species mixtures should be based on direct sampling from such mixtures rather than being predicted from values obtained from monocultures of constituent species. Under favourable ensiling conditions, unwilted binary mixtures and multi-species mixtures are satisfactorily preserved as silage, comparable to a perennial ryegrass monoculture receiving inorganic N fertiliser. However, when ensiled under more challenging crop conditions the mixtures exhibited a greater requirement for their preservation to be aided, compared with the perennial ryegrass monoculture. Despite the application of inorganic N reducing the legume content of multi-species mixture swards, it had relatively little effect on herbage ensilability or silage preservation. For all species treatments, silage nutritive values were primarily dependent on the pre-ensiling values, although herbage digestibility values declined during ensilage where the ensilage process was inefficient. The current study suggests that in order to be satisfactorily preserved as silage, binary grass-clover and multi-species swards have a greater requirement for an adequate rapid field wilt and/or effective preservative application compared with perennial ryegrass produced using inorganic fertiliser N.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
草-红三叶草和多种草青贮与单种草青贮的保存效率和营养价值
与多年生黑麦草单一栽培相比,二元草-三叶草和多种草可提高牧草产量或减少无机肥料氮的投入。然而,青贮过程的效率和多种草青贮的营养价值还没有文献记载。将草-红三叶草二元混合物和多种混合物的重复样品在实验室筒仓中青贮,以评估与无机氮肥单种草相比的青贮性、发酵特性、保存损失和青贮营养价值。结果表明,对二元和多物种混合物的青贮性和后续青贮特性的评估应基于从这些混合物中直接取样,而不是从组成物种的单一培养中获得的值进行预测。在有利的青贮条件下,未枯萎的二元混合物和多物种混合物可以令人满意地作为青贮物保存,可与多年生黑麦草单一栽培接受无机氮肥料相媲美。然而,与多年生黑麦草单一栽培相比,在更具挑战性的作物条件下青贮时,混合物对保存的要求更高。施用无机氮虽然降低了多种混交草中豆科植物的含量,但对牧草的易贮性和青贮保鲜效果相对较小。青贮的营养价值主要取决于青贮前的价值,但由于青贮过程效率低下,牧草消化率在青贮期间有所下降。目前的研究表明,与施用无机氮肥的多年生黑麦草相比,二元草三叶草和多种草对快速大田枯萎和/或有效防腐剂的要求更高,以使其作为青贮物得到满意的保存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research is a peer reviewed open access scientific journal published by Teagasc (Agriculture and Food Development Authority, Ireland). Manuscripts on any aspect of research of direct relevance to Irish agriculture and food production, including plant and animal sciences, food science, agri environmental science, soils, engineering, buildings, economics and sociology, will be considered for publication. The work must demonstrate novelty and relevance to the field of research. Papers published or offered for publication elsewhere will not be considered, but the publication of an abstract does not preclude the publication of the full paper in this journal.
期刊最新文献
Genetic and phenotypic trends for carcass traits in Irish beef cattle Influence of a cattle access point on temporal changes in stream turbidity Utilising commercial farm grass growth data to evaluate long-term dry matter production of perennial ryegrass varieties Consumer assessment, in Ireland and the United Kingdom, of the impact of the method of suspension of carcasses from dairy-origin bulls and steers, on the sensory characteristics of the longissimus muscle Labour self-sufficiency on family dairy farms in Ireland: a case study approach considering labour requirement, input and management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1