Adapting Evidence-Based Tobacco Addiction Treatment for Inuit Living in Ontario: A Qualitative Study of Collaboration and Co-creation to Move From Pan-Indigenous to Inuit-Specific Programming

IF 1.2 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH International Journal of Indigenous Health Pub Date : 2021-01-25 DOI:10.32799/IJIH.V16I2.33119
Megan Barker, Anita Uuttuvak, Christine Lund, Rosa Dragonetti, P. Selby
{"title":"Adapting Evidence-Based Tobacco Addiction Treatment for Inuit Living in Ontario: A Qualitative Study of Collaboration and Co-creation to Move From Pan-Indigenous to Inuit-Specific Programming","authors":"Megan Barker, Anita Uuttuvak, Christine Lund, Rosa Dragonetti, P. Selby","doi":"10.32799/IJIH.V16I2.33119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nSettler introduction of tobacco to Inuit Nunangat (homeland of Inuit in Canada) has led to high tobacco use prevalence among Inuit. Inuit are moving from traditional territories to the province of Ontario to access resources, including health services. Indigenous-specific tobacco cessation approaches in Ontario lack cultural relevance among Inuit, as they often reflect First Nations and Métis worldviews. To improve effectiveness of tobacco cessation services for Inuit living in Ontario, materials reflective of Inuit culture and worldviews were developed through a community-based participatory approach. The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health collaborated with Tungasuvvingat Inuit and members of an Engagement Circle who work with Inuit or identify as Inuk (n = 25) to initiate a knowledge translation project aimed at co-creating a toolkit of Inuit-specific cessation resources. Development was guided by Two-Eyed Seeing, whereby Inuit and Western worldviews come together to support a strengths-based approach. The toolkit was evaluated through a pilot session and focus group with Inuit living in Ottawa who use tobacco (n = 13) and an online survey administered with a group of helpers who work with Inuit (n = 11). Analysis of qualitative data from the focus group and online survey highlighted five themes: choice, cultural relevance and safety, capacity-building, access, and impact. Focus group participants reported they learned quitting was possible and identified new strategies to quit through the session. Our findings emphasize the importance of engagement and co-creation with Indigenous Peoples to ensure cultural relevance and appropriateness of healthcare interventions. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":54163,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Indigenous Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Indigenous Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32799/IJIH.V16I2.33119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Settler introduction of tobacco to Inuit Nunangat (homeland of Inuit in Canada) has led to high tobacco use prevalence among Inuit. Inuit are moving from traditional territories to the province of Ontario to access resources, including health services. Indigenous-specific tobacco cessation approaches in Ontario lack cultural relevance among Inuit, as they often reflect First Nations and Métis worldviews. To improve effectiveness of tobacco cessation services for Inuit living in Ontario, materials reflective of Inuit culture and worldviews were developed through a community-based participatory approach. The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health collaborated with Tungasuvvingat Inuit and members of an Engagement Circle who work with Inuit or identify as Inuk (n = 25) to initiate a knowledge translation project aimed at co-creating a toolkit of Inuit-specific cessation resources. Development was guided by Two-Eyed Seeing, whereby Inuit and Western worldviews come together to support a strengths-based approach. The toolkit was evaluated through a pilot session and focus group with Inuit living in Ottawa who use tobacco (n = 13) and an online survey administered with a group of helpers who work with Inuit (n = 11). Analysis of qualitative data from the focus group and online survey highlighted five themes: choice, cultural relevance and safety, capacity-building, access, and impact. Focus group participants reported they learned quitting was possible and identified new strategies to quit through the session. Our findings emphasize the importance of engagement and co-creation with Indigenous Peoples to ensure cultural relevance and appropriateness of healthcare interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
适应以证据为基础的烟草成瘾治疗生活在安大略省的因纽特人:合作和共同创造的定性研究,从泛土著到因纽特特定的规划
定居者将烟草引入因纽特人的努南加特(加拿大因纽特人的故乡),导致因纽特人的烟草使用率很高。因纽特人正从传统领土向安大略省迁移,以获取资源,包括保健服务。安大略省土著特有的戒烟方法在因纽特人中缺乏文化相关性,因为它们往往反映了第一民族和姆萨梅蒂斯人的世界观。为了提高为居住在安大略省的因纽特人提供的戒烟服务的有效性,通过基于社区的参与性方法编写了反映因纽特文化和世界观的材料。成瘾和心理健康中心与tungasvvingat Inuit以及与因纽特人一起工作或认定为因纽特人的订婚圈成员(n = 25)合作,发起了一个知识翻译项目,旨在共同创建一个针对因纽特人的戒烟资源工具包。发展的指导方针是“两只眼睛看”,即因纽特人和西方人的世界观结合在一起,支持以优势为基础的方法。该工具包通过试点会议和与居住在渥太华的因纽特人吸烟的焦点小组(n = 13)以及与因纽特人一起工作的一组助手(n = 11)进行的在线调查进行评估。焦点小组和在线调查的定性数据分析突出了五个主题:选择、文化相关性和安全、能力建设、获取和影响。焦点小组参与者报告说,他们了解到戒烟是可能的,并在会议期间确定了戒烟的新策略。我们的研究结果强调了与土著人民的参与和共同创造的重要性,以确保医疗保健干预的文化相关性和适当性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Indigenous Health
International Journal of Indigenous Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Development of the Indigenous Health Toolkit Strength-Based approaches to providing an Aboriginal Community Child Health Service Culture, Health and Wellbeing: Yarning with the Victorian Indigenous community You Belong to Everyone Meaningful Positioning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1