Self-determination, Democracy, Human Rights, and Migrants’ Rights

Q3 Arts and Humanities International Journal of Applied Philosophy Pub Date : 2021-04-03 DOI:10.5840/IJAP202142151
Gillian Brock
{"title":"Self-determination, Democracy, Human Rights, and Migrants’ Rights","authors":"Gillian Brock","doi":"10.5840/IJAP202142151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What weight should we place on self-determination, democracy, human rights and equality in an account of migration justice? Anna Stilz and Andrea Sangiovanni offer insightful comments that prompt us to consider such questions. In addressing their welcome critiques I aim to show how my account can help reduce migration injustice in our contemporary world. As I argue, there is no right to free movement across state borders. However, migrants do have rights to a fair process for determining their rights. Democratic communities should have scope to make many migration decisions, although there are constraints on that self-determination. The migration governance oversight arrangements I favor are compatible with core requirements of agency and responsiveness that are operative in mature democracies. In responding to concerns about objectionable power inequalities that often characterize temporary worker programs, I show why addressing these issues requires various institutional protections that are well enforced. Robust migration governance arrangements can assist in formulating defensible migration policies that we can implement here and now as we aim to reduce migration injustices in our current world.","PeriodicalId":35847,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/IJAP202142151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What weight should we place on self-determination, democracy, human rights and equality in an account of migration justice? Anna Stilz and Andrea Sangiovanni offer insightful comments that prompt us to consider such questions. In addressing their welcome critiques I aim to show how my account can help reduce migration injustice in our contemporary world. As I argue, there is no right to free movement across state borders. However, migrants do have rights to a fair process for determining their rights. Democratic communities should have scope to make many migration decisions, although there are constraints on that self-determination. The migration governance oversight arrangements I favor are compatible with core requirements of agency and responsiveness that are operative in mature democracies. In responding to concerns about objectionable power inequalities that often characterize temporary worker programs, I show why addressing these issues requires various institutional protections that are well enforced. Robust migration governance arrangements can assist in formulating defensible migration policies that we can implement here and now as we aim to reduce migration injustices in our current world.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自决、民主、人权和移民权利
在对移民正义的解释中,我们应该对自决、民主、人权和平等给予多大的重视?Anna Stilz和Andrea Sangiovanni提供了深刻的评论,促使我们思考这些问题。在回应他们令人欢迎的批评时,我的目的是展示我的描述如何有助于减少当代世界的移民不公正现象。正如我所说,没有跨州自由流动的权利。然而,移徙者确实有权通过公平的程序来确定其权利。民主社区应该有余地做出许多移民决定,尽管这种自决受到限制。我支持的移民治理监督安排与成熟民主国家中运作的机构和响应的核心要求是兼容的。在回应人们对临时工项目中令人反感的权力不平等的担忧时,我展示了为什么解决这些问题需要各种制度保护,这些保护必须得到很好的执行。强有力的移民治理安排有助于制定可辩护的移民政策,我们可以在此时此地实施这些政策,以减少当今世界的移民不公正现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Applied Philosophy
International Journal of Applied Philosophy Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
The Ethics of Cultivated Meat in advance Proportionality in Self-Defense in advance Public Support of Sectarian Education in advance Trolley Problem Applied in advance Moral Machines in advance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1