Introduction to Smith Studies in Social Work: Special Issue on Social Work and Social Class

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL WORK SMITH COLLEGE STUDIES IN SOCIAL WORK Pub Date : 2020-04-02 DOI:10.1080/00377317.2019.1686932
J. Lesser
{"title":"Introduction to Smith Studies in Social Work: Special Issue on Social Work and Social Class","authors":"J. Lesser","doi":"10.1080/00377317.2019.1686932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Smith Studies has devoted a certain number of journals to “special interests,” highlighting theoretical models, diversity, end of life challenges, and other contemporary topics in the field of social work. These special issues complement the mission of the School and the Smith Studies Journal, which is to educate social workers in clinical practice, grounded in theory, research, professional ethics, social justice and the School’s commitment to antiracism. This special issue of Smith Studies addresses social class as an important component of the various contextual components of diversity, a recurring theme in social work literature (Strier, 2009). Karl Marx developed the concept of social class in the nineteenth century to explain the impact of political and economic structures on social life. Class centered power relations are part of America’s political legacy from Great Britain’s class system and inherited ideas about poverty. In America, racial and class dominance are intertwined, and political and economic power is held by the white ruling elite. The structural issues of poverty, race, ethnicity, gender, and cultural inequality are all tied to the dynamics of class. Institutional forces maintain differential access to resources, and constitute the personal and structural consequences of classism, such as access to a privileged school or a safe neighborhood (Coleman 2012; Isenberg, 2016). A disproportionate number of the working poor and unemployed are persons of color. (Coleman, 2012; Cherlin, 2014). Historically, there has also been a poor and working-class population of whites (Isenberg, 2016; Vance, 2016). As Isenberg (2016, p. xv) notes: “Our class system is hinged on the evolving political rationales used to dismiss or demonize (or occasionally reclaim) those white rural outcasts seemingly incapable of becoming part of the mainstream society,” disparagingly referred to as “white trash”.’ It is noteworthy; however, that there are assets and privileges associated with being White in the United States which enables: “White folks in the lower stratums of household wealth to distinguish themselves from communities of color and instead identify with white individuals who are most advantaged by the economic assets of whiteness” (Clark & Spanierman, 2019, p. 141).","PeriodicalId":45273,"journal":{"name":"SMITH COLLEGE STUDIES IN SOCIAL WORK","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00377317.2019.1686932","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SMITH COLLEGE STUDIES IN SOCIAL WORK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00377317.2019.1686932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Smith Studies has devoted a certain number of journals to “special interests,” highlighting theoretical models, diversity, end of life challenges, and other contemporary topics in the field of social work. These special issues complement the mission of the School and the Smith Studies Journal, which is to educate social workers in clinical practice, grounded in theory, research, professional ethics, social justice and the School’s commitment to antiracism. This special issue of Smith Studies addresses social class as an important component of the various contextual components of diversity, a recurring theme in social work literature (Strier, 2009). Karl Marx developed the concept of social class in the nineteenth century to explain the impact of political and economic structures on social life. Class centered power relations are part of America’s political legacy from Great Britain’s class system and inherited ideas about poverty. In America, racial and class dominance are intertwined, and political and economic power is held by the white ruling elite. The structural issues of poverty, race, ethnicity, gender, and cultural inequality are all tied to the dynamics of class. Institutional forces maintain differential access to resources, and constitute the personal and structural consequences of classism, such as access to a privileged school or a safe neighborhood (Coleman 2012; Isenberg, 2016). A disproportionate number of the working poor and unemployed are persons of color. (Coleman, 2012; Cherlin, 2014). Historically, there has also been a poor and working-class population of whites (Isenberg, 2016; Vance, 2016). As Isenberg (2016, p. xv) notes: “Our class system is hinged on the evolving political rationales used to dismiss or demonize (or occasionally reclaim) those white rural outcasts seemingly incapable of becoming part of the mainstream society,” disparagingly referred to as “white trash”.’ It is noteworthy; however, that there are assets and privileges associated with being White in the United States which enables: “White folks in the lower stratums of household wealth to distinguish themselves from communities of color and instead identify with white individuals who are most advantaged by the economic assets of whiteness” (Clark & Spanierman, 2019, p. 141).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会工作史密斯研究导论:社会工作与社会阶层特刊
Smith Studies在一定数量的期刊上专门报道了“特殊兴趣”,突出了社会工作领域的理论模式、多样性、生命终结挑战和其他当代主题。这些特刊补充了学校和《史密斯研究杂志》的使命,该杂志以理论、研究、职业道德、社会正义和学校对反种族主义的承诺为基础,对社会工作者进行临床实践教育。这期《史密斯研究》特刊将社会阶级作为多样性的各种背景组成部分的重要组成部分,这是社会工作文学中反复出现的主题(Strier,2009)。卡尔·马克思在19世纪提出了社会阶级的概念,以解释政治和经济结构对社会生活的影响。以阶级为中心的权力关系是英国阶级制度遗留下来的美国政治遗产的一部分,并继承了关于贫困的思想。在美国,种族和阶级统治交织在一起,政治和经济权力由白人统治精英掌握。贫困、种族、民族、性别和文化不平等等结构性问题都与阶级动态有关。制度力量维持着对资源的不同获取,并构成了阶级主义的个人和结构性后果,例如进入特权学校或安全社区(Coleman 2012;伊森伯格,2016)。有色人种在贫困劳动者和失业者中所占比例过高。(Coleman,2012;Cherlin,2014)。从历史上看,白人中也有穷人和工人阶级(Isenberg,2016;万斯,2016)。正如Isenberg(2016,第xv页)所指出的:“我们的阶级制度取决于不断演变的政治理性,这些理性被用来解雇或妖魔化(或偶尔收回)那些似乎无法成为主流社会一部分的白人农村弃儿,”被轻蔑地称为“白人垃圾”值得注意的是;然而,在美国,身为白人有一些资产和特权,这使得:“家庭财富较低阶层的白人能够将自己与有色人种社区区分开来,转而认同白人经济资产最有利的白人个人”(Clark&Spanierman,2019,第141页)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Smith College Studies in Social Work focuses on the vital issues facing practitioners today, featuring only those articles that advance theoretical understanding of psychological and social functioning, present clinically relevant research findings, and promote excellence in clinical practice. This refereed journal addresses issues of mental health, therapeutic process, trauma and recovery, psychopathology, racial and cultural diversity, culturally responsive clinical practice, intersubjectivity, the influence of postmodern theory on clinical practice, community based practice, and clinical services for specific populations of psychologically and socially vulnerable clients.
期刊最新文献
The Impact of the NeuroAffective Relational Model (NARM) on Client Agency “Something There is That doesn’t Love a Wall”: Notes on the Limits of Risk-Based Boundary Norms in Clinical Social Work Exploring the Radical Potential of Queer AZN and Pasifika CRT for Clinical Social Work Praxis “Angry at the Wrong Thing:” Queering Ketamine Assisted Psychotherapy for Clients Experiencing Body Image and Eating Distress Homeless and Hospitalized: A Case Study of Intervention to Support Collaborative Behavior and Safety
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1