Critique and the Black Horizon: questioning the move ‘beyond’ the human/nature divide in international relations

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Cambridge Review of International Affairs Pub Date : 2023-07-10 DOI:10.1080/09557571.2023.2231090
Farai Chipato, D. Chandler
{"title":"Critique and the Black Horizon: questioning the move ‘beyond’ the human/nature divide in international relations","authors":"Farai Chipato, D. Chandler","doi":"10.1080/09557571.2023.2231090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the contemporary moment of the Anthropocene there appears to be a growing consensus on the need to move beyond the key modernist binary, the Human/Nature divide. We draw out a shared understanding at work in International Relations across critical approaches in Science and Technology Studies (STS), new materialist, and material feminist fields, as well as critical Indigenous, decolonial and pluriversal thought. This is an understanding that seeks to go beyond the limits of modern epistemological and ontological assumptions of human exceptionalism. These approaches seek to rework both sides of the Human/Nature divide: to reconstitute the Human as a knowing, responsive and relational subject, no longer tainted by hierarchies of race and coloniality; while, redistributing agential capacities of responsivity, care and relation beyond the Human. Drawing from work across the broad field of critical Black studies, we flag up the limitations of these entangled, relational posthuman and more-than-human imaginaries, which can easily reproduce hierarchies of subordination and control. We suggest that another approach to the Human/Nature divide is possible, a critical perspective we call the Black Horizon, focused upon the task of deconstruction: an approach which emphasises difference rather than identity, negation rather than addition, critique rather than affirmation.","PeriodicalId":51580,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Review of International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2023.2231090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the contemporary moment of the Anthropocene there appears to be a growing consensus on the need to move beyond the key modernist binary, the Human/Nature divide. We draw out a shared understanding at work in International Relations across critical approaches in Science and Technology Studies (STS), new materialist, and material feminist fields, as well as critical Indigenous, decolonial and pluriversal thought. This is an understanding that seeks to go beyond the limits of modern epistemological and ontological assumptions of human exceptionalism. These approaches seek to rework both sides of the Human/Nature divide: to reconstitute the Human as a knowing, responsive and relational subject, no longer tainted by hierarchies of race and coloniality; while, redistributing agential capacities of responsivity, care and relation beyond the Human. Drawing from work across the broad field of critical Black studies, we flag up the limitations of these entangled, relational posthuman and more-than-human imaginaries, which can easily reproduce hierarchies of subordination and control. We suggest that another approach to the Human/Nature divide is possible, a critical perspective we call the Black Horizon, focused upon the task of deconstruction: an approach which emphasises difference rather than identity, negation rather than addition, critique rather than affirmation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
批判与黑地平线:质疑在国际关系中“超越”人与自然的界限
在人类世的当代时刻,人们似乎越来越一致地认为有必要超越现代主义的关键二元对立,即人与自然的鸿沟。我们在国际关系领域的工作中,对科学技术研究(STS)、新唯物主义和物质女权主义领域的批判性方法,以及批判性土著、非殖民化和多方面思想达成了共同的理解。这是一种试图超越人类例外论的现代认识论和本体论假设的理解。这些方法试图重新塑造人与自然之间的鸿沟:将人重新构建为一个了解、反应和关系的主体,不再被种族和殖民主义的等级制度所玷污;同时,在人之外重新分配主体的责任、关怀和关系能力。从黑人批判性研究这一广泛领域的工作中,我们指出了这些纠缠不休、关系密切的后人类想象和超越人类的想象的局限性,它们可以很容易地再现从属和控制的等级制度。我们认为,另一种解决人与自然鸿沟的方法是可能的,一种我们称之为“黑地平线”的批判视角,专注于解构的任务:一种强调差异而非同一性、否定而非加法、批判而非肯定的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Ascending Orders: Rising Powers and the Politics of Status in International InstitutionsRohan Mukherjee, Ascending Orders: Rising Powers and the Politics of Status in International Institutions , Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2022, ISBN: 9781009195874 (ebook), 9781009186810 (hbk), 324 pp. Farahnaz Ispahani, Politics of hate: Religious majoritarianism in South Asia Farahnaz Ispahani, Politics of hate: Religious majoritarianism in South Asia , Harper Collins, Gurugram, Haryana, India, 2023, ISBN-13: 978-9356293557, ISBN-10: 9356293554 (pbk), 336 pp Letter from the editors, CRIA Volume 37, Issue 1 Everyday nuclear histories and futures in the Middle East, 1945–1948 The ‘situatedness’ of security in postcolonial spaces: Examining the historical and spatial trajectories of localised practices in Tunisia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1