Conceptualising Autistic Masking, Camouflaging, and Neurotypical Privilege: Towards a Minority Group Model of Neurodiversity

IF 4.4 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Human Development Pub Date : 2022-03-21 DOI:10.1159/000524122
E. Radulski
{"title":"Conceptualising Autistic Masking, Camouflaging, and Neurotypical Privilege: Towards a Minority Group Model of Neurodiversity","authors":"E. Radulski","doi":"10.1159/000524122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Autistic masking and camouflaging – concealing Autistic traits and “passing” as non-Autistic – are linked to negative developmental consequences including stress, mental illness, identity loss, and suicidality. Recent psychological literature on masking and camouflaging seeks to urgently address these issues – yet overlooks relevant sociological research. This study uses Sara Ahmed and Frantz Fanon’s work on masking, alongside Judith Butler’s concept of performativity, to formulate distinct sociological definitions for Autistic masking and camouflaging. I offer a qualitative critical discourse analysis of 2018’s #TakeTheMaskOff neurodiversity activism campaign, alongside psychology masking/camouflaging literature, to question the social drivers of masking and camouflaging. Autism is widely understood as an “invisible” disability. However, I found that the necessity of masking and camouflaging to avoid discrimination renders Autistic people a “visible Neurominority group.” Proposing a new Minority Group Model of Neurodiversity, I argue that Neurotypical hegemony, invisibility, and majority group privilege are key social drivers of masking and camouflaging.","PeriodicalId":47837,"journal":{"name":"Human Development","volume":"66 1","pages":"113 - 127"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000524122","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Autistic masking and camouflaging – concealing Autistic traits and “passing” as non-Autistic – are linked to negative developmental consequences including stress, mental illness, identity loss, and suicidality. Recent psychological literature on masking and camouflaging seeks to urgently address these issues – yet overlooks relevant sociological research. This study uses Sara Ahmed and Frantz Fanon’s work on masking, alongside Judith Butler’s concept of performativity, to formulate distinct sociological definitions for Autistic masking and camouflaging. I offer a qualitative critical discourse analysis of 2018’s #TakeTheMaskOff neurodiversity activism campaign, alongside psychology masking/camouflaging literature, to question the social drivers of masking and camouflaging. Autism is widely understood as an “invisible” disability. However, I found that the necessity of masking and camouflaging to avoid discrimination renders Autistic people a “visible Neurominority group.” Proposing a new Minority Group Model of Neurodiversity, I argue that Neurotypical hegemony, invisibility, and majority group privilege are key social drivers of masking and camouflaging.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
概念化自闭症掩蔽、伪装和神经典型特权:迈向神经多样性的少数群体模型
自闭症掩饰和伪装——隐藏自闭症特征并“冒充”非自闭症患者——与负面发展后果有关,包括压力、精神疾病、身份丧失和自杀。最近关于掩蔽和伪装的心理学文献试图紧急解决这些问题,但却忽视了相关的社会学研究。本研究利用Sara Ahmed和Frantz Fanon关于掩蔽的工作,以及Judith Butler的表演性概念,为自闭症掩蔽和掩蔽制定了不同的社会学定义。我对2018年的#TakeTheMaskOff神经多样性激进主义运动以及心理学掩蔽/伪装文学进行了定性的批判性话语分析,以质疑掩蔽和伪装的社会驱动因素。自闭症被广泛理解为一种“看不见的”残疾。然而,我发现,为了避免歧视,掩盖和伪装的必要性使自闭症患者成为“明显的神经少数群体”。在提出一种新的神经多样性少数群体模型时,我认为神经典型霸权、隐形性和多数群体特权是掩盖和掩饰的关键社会驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Development
Human Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Distinguished by its international recognition since 1958, "Human Development" publishes in-depth conceptual articles, commentaries, and essay book reviews that advance our understanding of developmental phenomena. Contributions serve to raise theoretical issues, flesh out interesting and potentially powerful ideas, and differentiate key constructs. Contributions are welcomed from varied disciplines, including anthropology, biology, education, history, philosophy, psychology, and sociology.
期刊最新文献
A Theoretical Framework of the Role of Racism in Adolescent Personal Identity Development: Applications to Racially Marginalized Youth in the U.S. Cheating Engagedly Described and the Judgment-Action Gap Narrowed Widely New Editorship of Human Development The Metaphysics of Development and Evolution. From Thing Ontology to Process Ontology Development of Primal World Beliefs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1