Process Evaluation for Diversified Academic Assessment Mechanism in Higher Education Institutions by Use of Data Mining

Heng Liang
{"title":"Process Evaluation for Diversified Academic Assessment Mechanism in Higher Education Institutions by Use of Data Mining","authors":"Heng Liang","doi":"10.3991/ijet.v18i14.41921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A diversified academic assessment mechanism can effectively improve students’ learning motivation, make up for the possible blind spots of a single assessment method, and better guide students’ learning and teachers’ teaching. Using data mining methods to process evaluation data for diversified academic assessment mechanisms in colleges and universities can discover patterns in students’ learning, find key factors affecting academic performance, and provide a basis for teaching reform. Most of the current process evaluation data mining methods focus on hard skills, such as academic performance and classroom participation, but it is difficult to evaluate soft skills such as critical thinking and teamwork. To this end, this paper studies the process evaluation data mining methods for a diversified academic assessment mechanism in colleges and universities. It constructs an indicator system for process evaluation of diversified academic assessment mechanism in colleges and universities, gives a quantitative method for indicators, and performs fuzzy comprehensive evaluation based on AHP-entropy weight method. For the evaluation of text-based indicators, a consistency training method is introduced to train the process evaluation correlation mining model using a large amount of unlabeled process evaluation examples, which effectively solves the problems of lack of labeled data, high labeling cost, and changes in data distribution, and improves the performance and availability of the model. The experimental results verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.","PeriodicalId":47933,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i14.41921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A diversified academic assessment mechanism can effectively improve students’ learning motivation, make up for the possible blind spots of a single assessment method, and better guide students’ learning and teachers’ teaching. Using data mining methods to process evaluation data for diversified academic assessment mechanisms in colleges and universities can discover patterns in students’ learning, find key factors affecting academic performance, and provide a basis for teaching reform. Most of the current process evaluation data mining methods focus on hard skills, such as academic performance and classroom participation, but it is difficult to evaluate soft skills such as critical thinking and teamwork. To this end, this paper studies the process evaluation data mining methods for a diversified academic assessment mechanism in colleges and universities. It constructs an indicator system for process evaluation of diversified academic assessment mechanism in colleges and universities, gives a quantitative method for indicators, and performs fuzzy comprehensive evaluation based on AHP-entropy weight method. For the evaluation of text-based indicators, a consistency training method is introduced to train the process evaluation correlation mining model using a large amount of unlabeled process evaluation examples, which effectively solves the problems of lack of labeled data, high labeling cost, and changes in data distribution, and improves the performance and availability of the model. The experimental results verify the effectiveness of the proposed method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于数据挖掘的高校多元化学术评价机制的过程评价
多元化的学术评价机制可以有效地提高学生的学习动机,弥补单一评价方法可能存在的盲点,更好地指导学生的学习和教师的教学。利用数据挖掘方法对高校多种学业评估机制的评价数据进行处理,可以发现学生的学习规律,找到影响学业成绩的关键因素,为教学改革提供依据。目前大多数过程评价数据挖掘方法侧重于学习成绩和课堂参与度等硬技能,而难以评估批判性思维和团队合作等软技能。为此,本文研究了面向高校多元化学术评估机制的过程评价数据挖掘方法。构建了高校多元化学术评价机制过程评价的指标体系,给出了指标的定量方法,并基于ahp -熵权法进行模糊综合评价。针对基于文本的指标评价,引入一致性训练方法,利用大量未标注的过程评价实例对过程评价关联挖掘模型进行训练,有效解决了标注数据缺乏、标注成本高、数据分布变化等问题,提高了模型的性能和可用性。实验结果验证了该方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
352
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: This interdisciplinary journal focuses on the exchange of relevant trends and research results and presents practical experiences gained while developing and testing elements of technology enhanced learning. It bridges the gap between pure academic research journals and more practical publications. So it covers the full range from research, application development to experience reports and product descriptions. Fields of interest include, but are not limited to: -Software / Distributed Systems -Knowledge Management -Semantic Web -MashUp Technologies -Platforms and Content Authoring -New Learning Models and Applications -Pedagogical and Psychological Issues -Trust / Security -Internet Applications -Networked Tools -Mobile / wireless -Electronics -Visualisation -Bio- / Neuroinformatics -Language /Speech -Collaboration Tools / Collaborative Networks
期刊最新文献
Information and communications technology (ICT) and academic excellence at the Federal University Wukari, Taraba State Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Consider Teachers Needs and Concerns in the Design of Educational Technology (EdTAM) Online Teaching Quality Evaluation: Entropy TOPSIS and Grouped Regression Model Personalizing Students' Learning Needs by a Teaching Decision Optimization Method Adoption of Internet of Things in the Higher Educational Institutions: Perspectives from South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1