Divergence In Rural Development: The Curious Case of Coffee Production in the Lake Kivu Region (First Half Twentieth Century)

IF 0.7 4区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY AFRICAN ECONOMIC HISTORY Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.1353/AEH.2018.0008
Sven Van Melkebeke
{"title":"Divergence In Rural Development: The Curious Case of Coffee Production in the Lake Kivu Region (First Half Twentieth Century)","authors":"Sven Van Melkebeke","doi":"10.1353/AEH.2018.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This article offers new insight into the reasons for diversity in rural development and speaks to a major debate in economic history. The New Institutional Economy approach promotes the idea of long-term economic underdevelopment as a consequence of colonialism. However, this approach tends to over-generalize historical processes and over-simplify the reasons for divergence in development. Many historians have criticized such bold explanations. They stress that the diversity of local conditions and the varying reactions of people to colonialism and capitalism have resulted in different and regionally distinct paths of economic development. This article endorses such criticism and advances a complex multi-caused model in order to explain diversity in rural development. By highlighting and critically assessing several plausible explanations, this article argues that the development of coffee production in the Lake Kivu region primarily contrasted because of an interplay of differences in land availability (demography) and in indigenous precolonial landholding systems that were enhanced during the colonial period due to judicial differences (colony versus mandate).","PeriodicalId":43935,"journal":{"name":"AFRICAN ECONOMIC HISTORY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/AEH.2018.0008","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AFRICAN ECONOMIC HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/AEH.2018.0008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT:This article offers new insight into the reasons for diversity in rural development and speaks to a major debate in economic history. The New Institutional Economy approach promotes the idea of long-term economic underdevelopment as a consequence of colonialism. However, this approach tends to over-generalize historical processes and over-simplify the reasons for divergence in development. Many historians have criticized such bold explanations. They stress that the diversity of local conditions and the varying reactions of people to colonialism and capitalism have resulted in different and regionally distinct paths of economic development. This article endorses such criticism and advances a complex multi-caused model in order to explain diversity in rural development. By highlighting and critically assessing several plausible explanations, this article argues that the development of coffee production in the Lake Kivu region primarily contrasted because of an interplay of differences in land availability (demography) and in indigenous precolonial landholding systems that were enhanced during the colonial period due to judicial differences (colony versus mandate).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农村发展的差异:基伍湖地区咖啡生产的离奇案例(20世纪上半叶)
摘要:这篇文章对农村发展多样性的原因提供了新的见解,并引发了经济史上的一场重大辩论。新制度经济方法提倡殖民主义造成的长期经济不发达的观念。然而,这种方法往往过于概括历史进程,过于简化发展中出现分歧的原因。许多历史学家批评了这种大胆的解释。他们强调,当地条件的多样性以及人们对殖民主义和资本主义的不同反应,导致了不同的、区域性的经济发展道路。本文赞同这种批评,并提出了一个复杂的多原因模型来解释农村发展的多样性。通过强调和批判性地评估几种合理的解释,这篇文章认为,基伍湖地区咖啡生产的发展主要是因为土地可用性(人口统计学)和殖民前土著土地持有制度的差异相互作用,而在殖民时期,由于司法差异(殖民地与授权),这些差异得到了加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gendered Labor Relations in Colonial and Post-Colonial Eritrea The "Global Collaboratory on the History of Labour Relations": Putting Women's Labor and Labor Relations in Sub-Saharan Africa in a Global Context Women's Labor Relations in Sub-Saharan Africa and The Global South Compared, 1800–2000 Introduction From Subsistence Farmers To Guardians of Food Security and Well-Being: Shifts and Continuities in Female Labor Relations in Tanzania (1800–2000)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1