First an Obstacle, Then Every Woman’s Dream: Discourses of Motherhood in Print Media, 1970–1979 versus 2010–2019

Auður Magndís Auðardóttir, Annadís Greta Rúdólfsdóttir
{"title":"First an Obstacle, Then Every Woman’s Dream: Discourses of Motherhood in Print Media, 1970–1979 versus 2010–2019","authors":"Auður Magndís Auðardóttir, Annadís Greta Rúdólfsdóttir","doi":"10.1080/08038740.2022.2139753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article, we focus on how motherhood is represented in print media interviews with mothers over two distinct decades, 1970–1979 and 2010–2019, in Iceland. We used an affective-discursive framework to analyse 67 and 207 media interviews published in the two periods, respectively. In the former period, we found that mothers challenged prevalent feeling rules that encouraged them to put the family before their own needs. They used the interviews to advocate for their individual subjectivity and right to choose to be both mothers and earners. The societal changes were considered instrumental for women’s ability to make choices. In the latter period, discussions about motherhood as a barrier to women’s participation in the workforce were minimal. Mothers embraced the Nordic earner–carer model and even-handedly discussed their careers and motherhood. Motherhood was framed as a joyful enterprise and an individual choice that marked the pathway to women’s personal and emotional fulfilment. We conclude that discursive-affective constructions of motherhood imply neoliberal models of subjectivity that draw attention away from structural inequalities. In both periods, the public construction of motherhood revolved around the experiences of privileged, white, middle-class and heterosexual women, with limited attention to the experiences of marginalized mothers.","PeriodicalId":45485,"journal":{"name":"NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2022.2139753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this article, we focus on how motherhood is represented in print media interviews with mothers over two distinct decades, 1970–1979 and 2010–2019, in Iceland. We used an affective-discursive framework to analyse 67 and 207 media interviews published in the two periods, respectively. In the former period, we found that mothers challenged prevalent feeling rules that encouraged them to put the family before their own needs. They used the interviews to advocate for their individual subjectivity and right to choose to be both mothers and earners. The societal changes were considered instrumental for women’s ability to make choices. In the latter period, discussions about motherhood as a barrier to women’s participation in the workforce were minimal. Mothers embraced the Nordic earner–carer model and even-handedly discussed their careers and motherhood. Motherhood was framed as a joyful enterprise and an individual choice that marked the pathway to women’s personal and emotional fulfilment. We conclude that discursive-affective constructions of motherhood imply neoliberal models of subjectivity that draw attention away from structural inequalities. In both periods, the public construction of motherhood revolved around the experiences of privileged, white, middle-class and heterosexual women, with limited attention to the experiences of marginalized mothers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
首先是一个障碍,然后是每个女人的梦想:1970-1979年与2010-2019年印刷媒体中的母性话语
在这篇文章中,我们关注的是在冰岛,在1970-1979年和2010-2019年这两个不同的十年里,母亲在印刷媒体采访中是如何表现母亲身份的。我们使用情感话语框架分别分析了这两个时期发表的67篇和207篇媒体采访。在前一个时期,我们发现母亲们挑战了鼓励她们把家庭放在个人需求之前的普遍情感规则。她们通过访谈来倡导自己的个人主体性和选择既做母亲又挣钱的权利。社会变化被认为有助于提高妇女做出选择的能力。在后一时期,很少有人讨论当母亲是妇女参加工作的障碍。母亲们接受了北欧的挣钱养家模式,不偏不偏不私地讨论她们的事业和母亲身份。母性被定义为一项快乐的事业和一种个人选择,标志着女性个人和情感实现的途径。我们的结论是,母性的话语情感结构暗示了主体性的新自由主义模式,将人们的注意力从结构不平等上转移开。在这两个时期,公众对母性的建构都围绕着特权女性、白人女性、中产阶级女性和异性恋女性的经历展开,对边缘化母亲的经历关注有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Molecular Rebellions. Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Aesthetics of Contamination in Trans Performance Art Hormones as (Rebellious) Messengers – An Interview with Professor Celia Roberts from the Australian National University Tracing Testosterone in Women’s Elite Sports News Coverage: Cisnormatively Policing the Category of Women “It’ll be All Right, Everybody Has Children”: Regretting Motherhood in Iceland Two Gender–Equal Nations? Anti-Gender Re-Configurations of National Belonging in Sweden and Spain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1