The conditions for progressive rights to bring about social change

Q2 Social Sciences Contemporary Justice Review Pub Date : 2020-06-23 DOI:10.1080/10282580.2020.1783254
Lin Liu
{"title":"The conditions for progressive rights to bring about social change","authors":"Lin Liu","doi":"10.1080/10282580.2020.1783254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT One of the major focuses of law and society studies is to illustrate how progressive rights could become an effective agent of progressive social change. Two perspectives of research have emerged in this field, with one underscoring the processual effect of progressive rights and the other highlighting the structural dimension of rights’ effect. Numerous case studies have been done by scholars from either the processual or structural camp. However, limited efforts have been made to evaluate a right’s processual and structural influence simultaneously. The current study fills this literature gap. First, I illustrate the criteria used to evaluate the processual and structural effect of a right, respectively. Then in a case study focusing on Affirmative Action Right, I apply the two sets of criteria in the assessment of the strengths as well as drawbacks of Affirmative Action Right. This study demonstrates that rights’ influence is multi-dimensional, and the structural dimension of influence is contingent on a set of conditions that are distinct from the conditions for the processual level of effect.","PeriodicalId":10583,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Justice Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10282580.2020.1783254","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Justice Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2020.1783254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT One of the major focuses of law and society studies is to illustrate how progressive rights could become an effective agent of progressive social change. Two perspectives of research have emerged in this field, with one underscoring the processual effect of progressive rights and the other highlighting the structural dimension of rights’ effect. Numerous case studies have been done by scholars from either the processual or structural camp. However, limited efforts have been made to evaluate a right’s processual and structural influence simultaneously. The current study fills this literature gap. First, I illustrate the criteria used to evaluate the processual and structural effect of a right, respectively. Then in a case study focusing on Affirmative Action Right, I apply the two sets of criteria in the assessment of the strengths as well as drawbacks of Affirmative Action Right. This study demonstrates that rights’ influence is multi-dimensional, and the structural dimension of influence is contingent on a set of conditions that are distinct from the conditions for the processual level of effect.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
进步权利带来社会变革的条件
摘要法律和社会研究的主要焦点之一是说明进步权利如何成为进步社会变革的有效推动者。该领域出现了两种研究视角,一种强调进步权利的过程效应,另一种强调权利效应的结构维度。来自过程或结构阵营的学者进行了大量的案例研究。然而,同时评估一项权利的过程和结构影响的努力有限。目前的研究填补了这一文献空白。首先,我说明了分别用于评估权利的过程效果和结构效果的标准。然后,在一个以平权为中心的案例研究中,我运用这两套标准来评估平权的优点和缺点。本研究表明,权利的影响是多维度的,影响的结构维度取决于一系列不同于影响过程水平的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Justice Review
Contemporary Justice Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Cultivating just campus communities: engaging university students in developing restorative justice alternatives Defining restorative justice: a perspective from England and Wales’s further education sector The agricultural prison industry: a scoping review The international criminal court and responsibility for mass atrocities: can JCE enhance capacity to hold masterminds accountable? Restorative justice for adult offenders in South Australia: judicial perspectives and insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1