Data Ableism: Ability Expectations and Marginalization in Automated Societies

IF 2.4 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Television & New Media Pub Date : 2022-02-22 DOI:10.1177/15274764221077660
Vassilis Charitsis, T. Lehtiniemi
{"title":"Data Ableism: Ability Expectations and Marginalization in Automated Societies","authors":"Vassilis Charitsis, T. Lehtiniemi","doi":"10.1177/15274764221077660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While data is increasingly proffered as the resource that unlocks the promises of the digitalized world, for underprivileged individuals and communities, instead of fulfilled promises, datafication means additional marginalization. Examining these forms of marginalization, this article considers how technological advancements come with ability expectations, and highlights the exclusion and discrimination of disadvantaged segments of the population that result from failing to meet digital ability expectations and reach prescribed data norms. Drawing from critical disability scholarship, we introduce the notions of data ableism and data disablism, which encapsulate privileged ability expectations pertaining to data production and the resulting forms of exclusion that are prevalent in automated societies. Underlining the intersectional nature of data ableism, we discern its two main mechanisms, namely data (in)visibility and data (un)desirability, and document the role of free market ideology in producing and upholding data ableism.","PeriodicalId":51551,"journal":{"name":"Television & New Media","volume":"24 1","pages":"3 - 18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Television & New Media","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764221077660","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

While data is increasingly proffered as the resource that unlocks the promises of the digitalized world, for underprivileged individuals and communities, instead of fulfilled promises, datafication means additional marginalization. Examining these forms of marginalization, this article considers how technological advancements come with ability expectations, and highlights the exclusion and discrimination of disadvantaged segments of the population that result from failing to meet digital ability expectations and reach prescribed data norms. Drawing from critical disability scholarship, we introduce the notions of data ableism and data disablism, which encapsulate privileged ability expectations pertaining to data production and the resulting forms of exclusion that are prevalent in automated societies. Underlining the intersectional nature of data ableism, we discern its two main mechanisms, namely data (in)visibility and data (un)desirability, and document the role of free market ideology in producing and upholding data ableism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数据能力歧视:自动化社会中的能力期望和边缘化
尽管数据越来越多地被视为释放数字化世界承诺的资源,但对于弱势个人和社区来说,数据化意味着更多的边缘化,而不是兑现承诺。通过研究这些形式的边缘化,本文考虑了技术进步如何与能力期望相结合,并强调了由于未能满足数字能力期望和达到规定的数据规范而导致的对弱势群体的排斥和歧视。根据批判性残疾学术,我们引入了数据能力主义和数据能力主义的概念,它们概括了与数据生产相关的特权能力期望,以及由此产生的在自动化社会中普遍存在的排斥形式。强调数据能力主义的交叉性,我们发现了它的两个主要机制,即数据的可见性和数据的可取性,并记录了自由市场意识形态在产生和维护数据能力主义中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Television & New Media explores the field of television studies, focusing on audience ethnography, public policy, political economy, cultural history, and textual analysis. Special topics covered include digitalization, active audiences, cable and satellite issues, pedagogy, interdisciplinary matters, and globalization, as well as race, gender, and class issues.
期刊最新文献
Ideology as/of Platform Affordance and Black Feminist Conceptualizations of “Canceling”: Reading Twitter Calling out Feminists: Antifeminist Hijacking of Cancel Culture in South Korea The Platformisation of Cancel Culture “Alex, DO NOT BACKPEDAL ON SANDY HOOK!”: Reactionary Fandom, Cancel Culture, and the Possibility of ‘Audience Capture’ on YouTube Cancel Culture and Trigger-Ready Fragmented Interest Groups: The Case of Depp Versus Amber Heard
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1