Spousal Support in Quebec: Resisting the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW Cahiers de Droit Pub Date : 2019-01-09 DOI:10.7202/1055260AR
Jodi Lazare
{"title":"Spousal Support in Quebec: Resisting the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines","authors":"Jodi Lazare","doi":"10.7202/1055260AR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 2005, the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines have become an essential part of the practice of family law throughout Canada. Aimed at structuring discretionary spousal support determinations under the Divorce Act and increasing the fairness of awards, the Advisory Guidelines have been embraced by appellate courts across jurisdictions. Quebec is the exception to that trend. Despite that marriage and divorce fall under federal jurisdiction, Quebec courts resist the application of these non-binding rules, written by two family law scholars. This article responds to Quebec’s resistance to the Advisory Guidelines and suggests that concerns about them may be misplaced. By reviewing the history of Quebec’s legislative approach to married spouses, it suggests that antipathy toward the Advisory Guidelines, based on their failure to reflect Quebec matrimonial law, is misguided. Rather, judicial approaches in Quebec based on autonomy and economic independence fail to reflect the reality of both the provincial and federal legislative landscapes respecting marriage and divorce.","PeriodicalId":42694,"journal":{"name":"Cahiers de Droit","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cahiers de Droit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1055260AR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Since 2005, the Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines have become an essential part of the practice of family law throughout Canada. Aimed at structuring discretionary spousal support determinations under the Divorce Act and increasing the fairness of awards, the Advisory Guidelines have been embraced by appellate courts across jurisdictions. Quebec is the exception to that trend. Despite that marriage and divorce fall under federal jurisdiction, Quebec courts resist the application of these non-binding rules, written by two family law scholars. This article responds to Quebec’s resistance to the Advisory Guidelines and suggests that concerns about them may be misplaced. By reviewing the history of Quebec’s legislative approach to married spouses, it suggests that antipathy toward the Advisory Guidelines, based on their failure to reflect Quebec matrimonial law, is misguided. Rather, judicial approaches in Quebec based on autonomy and economic independence fail to reflect the reality of both the provincial and federal legislative landscapes respecting marriage and divorce.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
魁北克的配偶支持:抵制配偶支持咨询指南
自2005年以来,《配偶支持咨询指南》已成为加拿大家庭法实践的重要组成部分。《咨询准则》的目的是根据《离婚法》确定酌情决定的配偶抚养费,并增加裁决的公平性,已被各司法管辖区的上诉法院所接受。魁北克是这一趋势的例外。尽管婚姻和离婚属于联邦司法管辖范围,但魁北克法院拒绝适用这些由两位家庭法学者撰写的不具约束力的规则。这篇文章回应了魁北克省对咨询指南的抵制,并建议对它们的关注可能是错位的。通过回顾魁北克对已婚配偶的立法方法的历史,它表明,基于咨询准则未能反映魁北克婚姻法而对其反感是错误的。相反,魁北克以自治和经济独立为基础的司法做法未能反映省和联邦关于婚姻和离婚的立法现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Présentation Le recours à la tutelle pour protéger les enfants en situation de vulnérabilité : une mesure de protection en changement Certitudes et incertitudes au coeur des droits de l’enfant La « question » de la réserve héréditaire : retour sur un psychodrame franco-français Miroir, miroir, dis-moi qui est la plus jeune ? La ménopause comme critère d’entrée dans la vieillesse pour les femmes : réflexions juridiques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1