Effects of choice of data aggregation method to a point on walking accessibility results using the G2SFCA method

Łukasz Lechowski
{"title":"Effects of choice of data aggregation method to a point on walking accessibility results using the G2SFCA method","authors":"Łukasz Lechowski","doi":"10.4467/2543859xpkg.22.023.17147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In spatial accessibility studies based on market areas, such as floating catchment area (FCA) family methods, it is crucial to identify the point to which weights are assigned, both on the demand and supply side. Bearing in mind that it is not always possible to work on disaggregated data, the aim of this paper was to investigate which method of determining a point, minimises bias in the estimation of walking accessibility. The research used the G2SFCA method, introduced by Dai, which has been employed several times to model walking accessibility. Results clearly show that point location methods for area units, based on disaggregating data to buildings, perform better at the scale of statistical districts or cadastral precincts, compared to those based on the centrally weighted mean. They also show that positional measures such as the Euclidean centrally weighted median can improve the results of analyses in units that are heterogeneous in terms of settlement network pattern.","PeriodicalId":52611,"journal":{"name":"Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prace Komisji Geografii Komunikacji PTG","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/2543859xpkg.22.023.17147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In spatial accessibility studies based on market areas, such as floating catchment area (FCA) family methods, it is crucial to identify the point to which weights are assigned, both on the demand and supply side. Bearing in mind that it is not always possible to work on disaggregated data, the aim of this paper was to investigate which method of determining a point, minimises bias in the estimation of walking accessibility. The research used the G2SFCA method, introduced by Dai, which has been employed several times to model walking accessibility. Results clearly show that point location methods for area units, based on disaggregating data to buildings, perform better at the scale of statistical districts or cadastral precincts, compared to those based on the centrally weighted mean. They also show that positional measures such as the Euclidean centrally weighted median can improve the results of analyses in units that are heterogeneous in terms of settlement network pattern.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用G2SFCA方法选择数据聚集方法对步行可达性结果的影响
在基于市场区域的空间可达性研究中,如浮动集水区(FCA)家庭方法,确定需求和供应方面的权重分配点至关重要。考虑到分类数据并不总是可行的,本文的目的是研究哪种确定点的方法,最大限度地减少步行可达性估计中的偏差。该研究使用了戴介绍的G2SFCA方法,该方法已多次用于建模步行可达性。结果清楚地表明,与基于集中加权平均值的方法相比,基于将数据分解为建筑物的区域单元的点定位方法在统计区或地籍区的规模上表现更好。他们还表明,欧几里得中心加权中值等位置测量可以改善在结算网络模式方面异质的单元中的分析结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pasażerskie połączenia kolejowe jako element sieci powiązań międzynarodowych polskich regionów Zmierzch czy koniec przedsiębiorstw Państwowej Komunikacji Samochodowej? Effects of the Covid-19 travel restrictions on metropolises mobility: empirical evidence from the Tricity metropolis (Poland) Wyzwania zrównoważonej mobilności miejskiej na tle polityki miejskiej Unii Europejskiej: wybrane przykłady Evolution of second-generation electromobility in public transport in Polish cities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1