“Can You Recommend a Good Lecturer for a Beginner?”: Korean Students’ Perceptions of the College Admission Essay Test

Subeom Kwak
{"title":"“Can You Recommend a Good Lecturer for a Beginner?”: Korean Students’\n Perceptions of the College Admission Essay Test","authors":"Subeom Kwak","doi":"10.30961/LR.2020.56.3.359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing has become an essential aspect of secondary education across the world. The college admission essay exam, a high-stakes test, has a strong influence on students’ understanding and notions of “good” writing. College admission essay tests in South Korea have been developed by Korean universities to measure Korean senior high school students’ level of argumentative writing skills. While research on writing in mother tongue contexts has traditionally focused on local experiences, writing studies on learners’ views and their affective factors have emerged recently in response to educational and contextual factors. Thus far, however, not enough attention has been paid to Korean students’ perceptions of college admission essay tests. To fill this research gap, this study explores Korean high school students’ perceptions of effective ways to learn writing and the challenges they face during test preparation and/or testing situations. From these explorations, the study draws important implications for writing instruction. After analyzing 3,440 postings from an online forum, the study’s findings reveal the underlying components of learning to write in preparation for these high-stakes tests: 1) add-on and after-school learning; 2) formulaic forms; and 3) concerns regarding the tests’ complex policies and standards. These findings contribute to a growing body of literature on writing studies while also shedding light on our own assumptions about the teaching and learning of secondary writing through an exploration of learners’ perspectives.","PeriodicalId":89433,"journal":{"name":"Language research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30961/LR.2020.56.3.359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Writing has become an essential aspect of secondary education across the world. The college admission essay exam, a high-stakes test, has a strong influence on students’ understanding and notions of “good” writing. College admission essay tests in South Korea have been developed by Korean universities to measure Korean senior high school students’ level of argumentative writing skills. While research on writing in mother tongue contexts has traditionally focused on local experiences, writing studies on learners’ views and their affective factors have emerged recently in response to educational and contextual factors. Thus far, however, not enough attention has been paid to Korean students’ perceptions of college admission essay tests. To fill this research gap, this study explores Korean high school students’ perceptions of effective ways to learn writing and the challenges they face during test preparation and/or testing situations. From these explorations, the study draws important implications for writing instruction. After analyzing 3,440 postings from an online forum, the study’s findings reveal the underlying components of learning to write in preparation for these high-stakes tests: 1) add-on and after-school learning; 2) formulaic forms; and 3) concerns regarding the tests’ complex policies and standards. These findings contribute to a growing body of literature on writing studies while also shedding light on our own assumptions about the teaching and learning of secondary writing through an exploration of learners’ perspectives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“你能为初学者推荐一位好的讲师吗?”:韩国学生对大学入学论文测试的看法
写作已经成为世界各地中等教育的一个重要方面。大学入学论文考试是一项高风险的考试,它对学生对“好”写作的理解和观念有很大影响。韩国大学开发了韩国大学入学论文测试,以衡量韩国高中生的议论文写作水平。虽然传统上对母语写作的研究主要集中在当地经历上,但针对教育和语境因素,最近出现了对学习者观点及其情感因素的写作研究。然而,到目前为止,韩国学生对大学入学论文测试的看法还没有得到足够的关注。为了填补这一研究空白,本研究探讨了韩国高中生对学习写作的有效方法的看法,以及他们在备考和/或考试中面临的挑战。从这些探索中,本研究得出了对写作教学的重要启示。在分析了一个在线论坛上的3440条帖子后,研究结果揭示了为这些高风险测试做准备而学习写作的基本组成部分:1)附加学习和课后学习;2) 公式化形式;以及3)对测试的复杂政策和标准的关注。这些发现为越来越多的写作研究文献做出了贡献,同时也通过探索学习者的视角,阐明了我们自己对中学写作教学的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On Causative Projections in Mandarin Chinese Chinese Word Order and the Two Typological “Exceptions”: A Scalar Approach On the Syntax of Unusual Subjects: Exceptional Case Marking Constructions Exploring VP/vP Preposing in Multiple Nominative Constructions A Case Study on English Test Item Development Training for Secondary School Teachers Using AI Tools: Focusing on ChatGPT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1