The Invisible Enclosure: How Community Supervision Inhibits Successful Reentry

J. Ortiz, K. Wrigley
{"title":"The Invisible Enclosure: How Community Supervision Inhibits Successful Reentry","authors":"J. Ortiz, K. Wrigley","doi":"10.1080/23774657.2020.1768967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The use of community supervision in the United States has dramatically increased over the past 40 years. Today, there are 4.5 million individuals on community supervision in the United States, nearly double the incarcerated population. Utilizing data from a two-year exploratory study of reentry experiences, we posit that contrary to its stated purpose of rehabilitation and reintegration, community supervision operates under mechanisms that hinder one’s ability to reenter society. Supervision places the formerly incarcerated person within an invisible enclosure that mandates obedience to a system designed to ensure failure. Supervision requirements – reporting requirements, programming, and fees – force the parolee or probationer to decide between their own wellbeing and obedience to the rules. Although some scholars view community supervision as an alternative to incarceration, the reality is that community supervision often serves to delay incarceration rather than serve as an alternative. When situated within a Foucauldian framework, our data illustrates how community supervision is merely an evolution of the carceral apparatus that ignores rehabilitation and serves to perpetuate the carceral continuum.","PeriodicalId":91861,"journal":{"name":"Corrections : policy, practice and research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23774657.2020.1768967","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corrections : policy, practice and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2020.1768967","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT The use of community supervision in the United States has dramatically increased over the past 40 years. Today, there are 4.5 million individuals on community supervision in the United States, nearly double the incarcerated population. Utilizing data from a two-year exploratory study of reentry experiences, we posit that contrary to its stated purpose of rehabilitation and reintegration, community supervision operates under mechanisms that hinder one’s ability to reenter society. Supervision places the formerly incarcerated person within an invisible enclosure that mandates obedience to a system designed to ensure failure. Supervision requirements – reporting requirements, programming, and fees – force the parolee or probationer to decide between their own wellbeing and obedience to the rules. Although some scholars view community supervision as an alternative to incarceration, the reality is that community supervision often serves to delay incarceration rather than serve as an alternative. When situated within a Foucauldian framework, our data illustrates how community supervision is merely an evolution of the carceral apparatus that ignores rehabilitation and serves to perpetuate the carceral continuum.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
看不见的圈地:社区监督如何阻碍成功重返社会
摘要在过去的40年里,美国社区监督的使用急剧增加。如今,美国有450万人接受社区监督,几乎是被监禁人口的两倍。利用一项为期两年的重返社会经历探索性研究的数据,我们假设,与康复和重返社会的既定目的相反,社区监督是在阻碍一个人重返社会能力的机制下运作的。监管将以前被监禁的人置于一个看不见的围栏内,要求他们服从一个旨在确保失败的系统。监管要求——报告要求、程序和费用——迫使被假释者或缓刑犯在自己的健康和遵守规则之间做出决定。尽管一些学者将社区监督视为监禁的替代方案,但现实是,社区监督往往是为了推迟监禁,而不是作为一种替代方案。当我们的数据位于傅科框架内时,我们的数据说明了社区监督如何仅仅是尸体器官的进化,而忽视了康复,并使尸体连续体永久化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hands-Off or Hands-On? Examining the Effect of Court Orders on Inmate Misconduct Gender-Responsive Programming for Women in the Community Corrections Context: A Scoping Review Receptivity to Jail-based medication for opioid use disorder among rural detention Administrators The Interplay Between Physical Activity and Psychological, Social, and Perceived Health in Juvenile Corrections Facilities Gender and the Release from Jail: Predicting the Likelihood of a Probation Violation versus a New Offense
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1