‘Reading intercultural encounters as art’: the call of the other and the relevance of beauty

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pedagogy Culture and Society Pub Date : 2023-01-03 DOI:10.1080/14681366.2022.2164343
Katja Frimberger
{"title":"‘Reading intercultural encounters as art’: the call of the other and the relevance of beauty","authors":"Katja Frimberger","doi":"10.1080/14681366.2022.2164343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores intercultural education research about intercultural encounters as aesthetic phenomena. I will argue that Gadamer’s notion of hermeneutical identity when encountering an artwork can enrich intercultural education studies’ (IES) conceptualisations of an event-based research and pedagogy, conceived as a mode of response to a personal address. Drawing on Emmanuel Levinas’ ethics as first philosophy, IES’s current ethical turn posits responsibility for the (radical) other (as a pre-ontological being-in-relation) – with the resulting fracturing of our self-directing ego – as the first reality of the self. In this article, I argue that Gadamer’s hermeneutics speak to the curious methodological paradox, which results from IES’ turn to Levinas. Here, Gadamer provokes fruitful methodological questions as to the kind of ‘research aesthetic’ that could plausibly emerge from such event-based research and pedagogy – when it seeks to sustain ontological/epistemological openness and not give (fully) into the ‘betrayal’ of (scientific) language.","PeriodicalId":46617,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","volume":"31 1","pages":"283 - 304"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2022.2164343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores intercultural education research about intercultural encounters as aesthetic phenomena. I will argue that Gadamer’s notion of hermeneutical identity when encountering an artwork can enrich intercultural education studies’ (IES) conceptualisations of an event-based research and pedagogy, conceived as a mode of response to a personal address. Drawing on Emmanuel Levinas’ ethics as first philosophy, IES’s current ethical turn posits responsibility for the (radical) other (as a pre-ontological being-in-relation) – with the resulting fracturing of our self-directing ego – as the first reality of the self. In this article, I argue that Gadamer’s hermeneutics speak to the curious methodological paradox, which results from IES’ turn to Levinas. Here, Gadamer provokes fruitful methodological questions as to the kind of ‘research aesthetic’ that could plausibly emerge from such event-based research and pedagogy – when it seeks to sustain ontological/epistemological openness and not give (fully) into the ‘betrayal’ of (scientific) language.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“将跨文化相遇视为艺术”:他者的呼唤与美的关联
本文探讨了跨文化教育研究中作为审美现象的跨文化相遇。我认为,伽达默尔在遇到艺术品时的解释学认同概念可以丰富跨文化教育研究(IES)对基于事件的研究和教学法的概念化,将其视为对个人地址的回应模式。伊曼纽尔·列维纳斯(Emmanuel Levinas)的伦理学作为第一哲学,IES当前的伦理转向将(激进的)他者(作为一种前本体论的存在关系)的责任——与我们自我导向的自我的断裂——作为自我的第一现实。在这篇文章中,我认为伽达默尔的解释学谈到了奇怪的方法论悖论,这是IES转向列维纳斯的结果。在这里,伽达默尔提出了富有成效的方法论问题,即“研究美学”的类型可能从这种基于事件的研究和教育学中合理地出现——当它寻求维持本体论/认识论的开放性,而不是(完全)给予(科学)语言的“背叛”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pedagogy Culture and Society
Pedagogy Culture and Society EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Pedagogy, Culture & Society is a fully-refereed international journal that seeks to provide an international forum for pedagogy discussion and debate. The identity of the journal is built on the belief that pedagogy debate has the following features: •Pedagogy debate is not restricted by geographical boundaries: its participants are the international educational community and its proceedings appeal to a worldwide audience. •Pedagogy debate is open and democratic: it is not the preserve of teachers, politicians, academics or administrators but requires open discussion.
期刊最新文献
Strengthening Indigenous parents’ co-leadership through culturally responsive home-school partnerships: a practical implementation framework “The farmer, the guide, and the bridge”: the voice of community partners within European Service-Learning Personal, pedagogic play: a dialogic model for video game learning Nurturing inclusivity and professional growth among vocational teachers through communities of practice The manifestations of universality and cultural specificity in national curriculum policy frameworks: negotiations for culturally reflective practice in early childhood education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1