Imperial Drug Economies, Development, and the Search for Alternatives in Asia, from Colonialism to Decolonisation

J. Collins
{"title":"Imperial Drug Economies, Development, and the Search for Alternatives in Asia, from Colonialism to Decolonisation","authors":"J. Collins","doi":"10.4000/poldev.3683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter challenges contemporary policy conceptions on the historical relationship between drugs and development policies. It uses a historical analysis to examine the interaction of drugs, governance, security, welfare and economic development policies within drug producing contexts in Asia, from colonialism through the period of decolonisation. It highlights that although modern narratives of drugs and development tend to view the latter as new and involving even immediately contemporary innovations for dealing with the outcomes of drug economies and drug policies, the historical reality is much more complex. Managing drugs and development was a fundamental historical process of state regulation, control and the settling of geographical boundaries, both economically and physically. This chapter posits two foundational ideas. First, the issues of drugs and development have always been fundamentally linked, from the globalisation of trade through mercantilist imperial policies, state formation, the limits of governance, the distribution of economic gains, and political economy outcomes stretching from the local to the global. Drugs, licit and illicit, have therefore always been an issue of economic development. Second, policymakers have long recognised and developed state responses based on the above reality. While not going under its now ‘official’ title, many of the principles of ‘alternative development’ have been ingrained in policy responses and limitations over the past several centuries.","PeriodicalId":30371,"journal":{"name":"Revue Internationale de Politique de Developpement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue Internationale de Politique de Developpement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/poldev.3683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter challenges contemporary policy conceptions on the historical relationship between drugs and development policies. It uses a historical analysis to examine the interaction of drugs, governance, security, welfare and economic development policies within drug producing contexts in Asia, from colonialism through the period of decolonisation. It highlights that although modern narratives of drugs and development tend to view the latter as new and involving even immediately contemporary innovations for dealing with the outcomes of drug economies and drug policies, the historical reality is much more complex. Managing drugs and development was a fundamental historical process of state regulation, control and the settling of geographical boundaries, both economically and physically. This chapter posits two foundational ideas. First, the issues of drugs and development have always been fundamentally linked, from the globalisation of trade through mercantilist imperial policies, state formation, the limits of governance, the distribution of economic gains, and political economy outcomes stretching from the local to the global. Drugs, licit and illicit, have therefore always been an issue of economic development. Second, policymakers have long recognised and developed state responses based on the above reality. While not going under its now ‘official’ title, many of the principles of ‘alternative development’ have been ingrained in policy responses and limitations over the past several centuries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从殖民主义到非殖民化,帝国毒品经济、发展与亚洲替代品的探索
本章挑战当代关于药物与发展政策之间历史关系的政策观念。它使用历史分析来检查药物,治理,安全,福利和经济发展政策在亚洲毒品生产背景下的相互作用,从殖民主义到非殖民化时期。报告强调指出,尽管关于毒品和发展的现代叙述倾向于将后者视为新的,甚至涉及处理毒品经济和毒品政策后果的当代创新,但历史现实要复杂得多。管理药物和发展是国家在经济上和物质上管制、控制和划定地理边界的一个基本历史过程。本章提出了两个基本观点。首先,从贸易全球化到重商主义的帝国政策、国家的形成、治理的限制、经济收益的分配,以及从地方到全球的政治经济结果,毒品问题和发展一直是基本联系在一起的。因此,合法和非法的毒品一直是经济发展的一个问题。其次,政策制定者早就认识到并制定了基于上述现实的国家应对措施。虽然“替代发展”的许多原则并没有被冠以现在的“官方”头衔,但在过去的几个世纪里,这些原则在政策回应和限制中已经根深蒂固。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊最新文献
Resistiendo frente a la extracción: desafíos para la creación de coaliciones entre los movimientos agrarios y antimineros Expanding Extractivisms: Extractivisms as Modes of Extraction Sustaining Imperial Modes of Living Regulación de la rehabilitación y el cierre de minas en tierras de propiedad indígena: Perspectivas de los Estados con recursos regulados de Australia y Canadá ‘We are nature defending itself’—The Forest of Dannenrod Occupation as an Example of Contested Extractivism in the Global North Les vies d’après de l’extraction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1