{"title":"Management of Grade II Furcation Defect in Mandibular Molars with Allograft and Alloplastic Bone Graft: A Clinico- Radiographic Study","authors":"T. Liu","doi":"10.37191/mapsci-2582-3736-3(3)-100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The present study was carried out to compare clinically and radiographically the efficacy of regenerative potential of Demineralizedfreeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) and Bioactive glass putty (Novabone© dental putty) in mandibular grade II furcation defects.\n\nMethods: In 34 Patients, 60 mandibular grade II furcation defects were treated using DFDBA and Bioactive glass putty. 30 furcations were treated using DFDBA, while bioactive glass putty was used to treat remaining 30 furcation defect. Clinical parameters evaluated were Plaque index (PI), Gingival index (GI), Probing pocket depth (PPD), Relative vertical attachment level (RVAL), Relative horizontal attachment level (RHAL) at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. Radiographic parameters recorded were linear measurement of defect depth and bone density in gray scale at baseline and 6 months.\n\nResults: Both the group showed significant reduction in mean (P≤0.05) GI, PI, PPD, RVAL and RHAL at 6 months. Group I showed greater reduction in PPD. Radiographic evaluation showed significant (P≤0.05) reduction in defect depth and increase in bone density in both groups.\n\nConclusions: Bioactive glass putty showed comparable regeneration to that of DFDBA in the treatment of mandibular grade II furcation defect. Additional putty consistency of bioactive glass makes it easier and more convenient to use.","PeriodicalId":92922,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry and oral sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry and oral sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37191/mapsci-2582-3736-3(3)-100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
同种异体骨和异体骨移植治疗下颌Ⅱ级分叉缺损的临床X线研究
目的:本研究在临床和放射学上比较去矿化冷冻干燥同种异体骨(DFDBA)和生物活性玻璃腻子(Novabone©牙科腻子)对下颌II级分叉缺陷的再生潜力的疗效。方法:采用DFDBA和生物活性玻璃腻子对34例下颌Ⅱ级分叉缺损患者进行治疗。使用DFDBA处理30个分叉,而使用生物活性玻璃腻子处理剩余的30个分叉缺陷。评估的临床参数为基线、3个月和6个月时的牙菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)、探袋深度(PPD)、相对垂直附着水平(RVAL)、相对水平附着水平(RHAL)。记录的放射学参数是在基线和6个月时以灰度级线性测量缺陷深度和骨密度。结果:两组在6个月时GI、PI、PPD、RVAL和RHAL的平均值均显著降低(P≤0.05)。第一组PPD下降幅度较大。放射学评估显示,两组的缺损深度显著减少(P≤0.05),骨密度增加。结论:生物活性玻璃腻子在治疗下颌Ⅱ级分叉缺损中表现出与DFDBA相当的再生能力。生物活性玻璃的额外腻子稠度使其使用更容易、更方便。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。