Pest risk information, agricultural outcomes and food security: evidence from Ghana

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Food Security Pub Date : 2023-09-04 DOI:10.1007/s12571-023-01398-w
Justice A. Tambo, Fredrick Mbugua, Solomon Agyemang Duah, Birgitta Oppong-Mensah, Christopher Yao Ocloo, Frances Williams
{"title":"Pest risk information, agricultural outcomes and food security: evidence from Ghana","authors":"Justice A. Tambo,&nbsp;Fredrick Mbugua,&nbsp;Solomon Agyemang Duah,&nbsp;Birgitta Oppong-Mensah,&nbsp;Christopher Yao Ocloo,&nbsp;Frances Williams","doi":"10.1007/s12571-023-01398-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article investigates the short-term effects of an information intervention that provided early warning pest alerts and integrated pest management (IPM)-based advice to smallholder farmers. Specifically, this study focuses on fall armyworm (<i>Spodoptera frugiperda</i>) of maize in Ghana. We particularly examine the relationships between access to pest risk information and a number of outcomes, ranging from farmer’s knowledge to household food security. This study is based on survey data collected between December 2021 and January 2022 from 888 farm households operating 1305 maize fields. Results from doubly robust and switching regression models indicated that exposure to the pest risk information campaign was significantly (<i>ρ</i> &lt; <i>0.05)</i> associated with increases in the likelihood of optimal timing of fall armyworm control action and the adoption of multiple IPM practices, but it had no significant effect on pesticide use. Households who received the pest risk information obtained an average of 4% or 54 kg/ha (ρ &lt; 0.01) gain in maize yield and were about 38% less likely (ρ &lt; 0.01) than their non-recipient counterparts to report experiencing hunger, as measured by the household hunger scale. However, the pest risk information campaign was not associated with greater household dietary diversity. Further results indicated that households where the pest risk information was received by women, alone or together with their spouses, were more likely (<i>ρ</i> &lt; <i>0.05)</i> to achieve positive outcomes than if the recipient of information were male member of households. Overall, our findings imply that the dissemination of early warning pest alerts in combination with actionable IPM information to smallholder farmers can contribute to the adoption of sustainable crop protection technologies, and ultimately improve the standard of living of farm households.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":567,"journal":{"name":"Food Security","volume":"15 6","pages":"1667 - 1683"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12571-023-01398-w.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Security","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12571-023-01398-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article investigates the short-term effects of an information intervention that provided early warning pest alerts and integrated pest management (IPM)-based advice to smallholder farmers. Specifically, this study focuses on fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) of maize in Ghana. We particularly examine the relationships between access to pest risk information and a number of outcomes, ranging from farmer’s knowledge to household food security. This study is based on survey data collected between December 2021 and January 2022 from 888 farm households operating 1305 maize fields. Results from doubly robust and switching regression models indicated that exposure to the pest risk information campaign was significantly (ρ < 0.05) associated with increases in the likelihood of optimal timing of fall armyworm control action and the adoption of multiple IPM practices, but it had no significant effect on pesticide use. Households who received the pest risk information obtained an average of 4% or 54 kg/ha (ρ < 0.01) gain in maize yield and were about 38% less likely (ρ < 0.01) than their non-recipient counterparts to report experiencing hunger, as measured by the household hunger scale. However, the pest risk information campaign was not associated with greater household dietary diversity. Further results indicated that households where the pest risk information was received by women, alone or together with their spouses, were more likely (ρ < 0.05) to achieve positive outcomes than if the recipient of information were male member of households. Overall, our findings imply that the dissemination of early warning pest alerts in combination with actionable IPM information to smallholder farmers can contribute to the adoption of sustainable crop protection technologies, and ultimately improve the standard of living of farm households.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有害生物风险信息、农业成果和粮食安全:来自加纳的证据
本文调查了一项信息干预措施的短期效果,该措施向小农提供虫害预警警报和基于虫害综合防治(IPM)的建议。具体而言,本研究重点关注加纳玉米的秋虫(Spodoptera frugiperda)。我们特别研究了获得虫害风险信息与一系列结果之间的关系,包括农民的知识和家庭粮食安全。本研究基于 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 1 月期间从经营 1305 块玉米田的 888 个农户收集的调查数据。双重稳健回归模型和转换回归模型的结果表明,接受虫害风险宣传活动与秋季军虫防治行动最佳时机可能性的增加和多种虫害综合防治措施的采用有显著相关性(ρ <0.05),但对农药的使用没有显著影响。接受虫害风险信息的家庭平均获得了 4% 或 54 公斤/公顷的玉米增产(ρ < 0.01),与未接受信息的家庭相比,其报告遭受饥饿的可能性降低了约 38%(ρ < 0.01)。然而,虫害风险宣传活动与家庭饮食多样性的提高并无关联。进一步的结果表明,由妇女单独或与配偶一起接受虫害风险信息的家庭比接受信息的男性家庭成员更有可能取得积极成果(ρ < 0.05)。总之,我们的研究结果表明,向小农户传播害虫预警信息以及可操作的虫害综合防治信息有助于采用可持续的作物保护技术,并最终提高农户的生活水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Security
Food Security FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
6.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Food Security is a wide audience, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to the procurement, access (economic and physical), and quality of food, in all its dimensions. Scales range from the individual to communities, and to the world food system. We strive to publish high-quality scientific articles, where quality includes, but is not limited to, the quality and clarity of text, and the validity of methods and approaches. Food Security is the initiative of a distinguished international group of scientists from different disciplines who hold a deep concern for the challenge of global food security, together with a vision of the power of shared knowledge as a means of meeting that challenge. To address the challenge of global food security, the journal seeks to address the constraints - physical, biological and socio-economic - which not only limit food production but also the ability of people to access a healthy diet. From this perspective, the journal covers the following areas: Global food needs: the mismatch between population and the ability to provide adequate nutrition Global food potential and global food production Natural constraints to satisfying global food needs: § Climate, climate variability, and climate change § Desertification and flooding § Natural disasters § Soils, soil quality and threats to soils, edaphic and other abiotic constraints to production § Biotic constraints to production, pathogens, pests, and weeds in their effects on sustainable production The sociological contexts of food production, access, quality, and consumption. Nutrition, food quality and food safety. Socio-political factors that impinge on the ability to satisfy global food needs: § Land, agricultural and food policy § International relations and trade § Access to food § Financial policy § Wars and ethnic unrest Research policies and priorities to ensure food security in its various dimensions.
期刊最新文献
The rice disease of the poor farmer returns a study in the Philippines shows the way Triple duty actions to address the global syndemic of undernutrition, obesity and environmental sustainability: a scoping review City governance, urban livelihoods, and food security: insights from street food trade in Kumasi, Ghana Potential response of Mexican consumers to a Ban on genetically modified Maize imports Too poor to choose? Analyzing food agency in food insecure households in rural Burundi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1