Introduction: Special issue on ‘The Covid-19 Pandemic, Inequalities and Human Rights in South Africa’, part 2

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW South African Journal on Human Rights Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/02587203.2021.2099560
C. Albertyn, R. Adams
{"title":"Introduction: Special issue on ‘The Covid-19 Pandemic, Inequalities and Human Rights in South Africa’, part 2","authors":"C. Albertyn, R. Adams","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2021.2099560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The South African Journal on Human Rights and the NRF South African Research Chair in Equality, Law and Social Justice are pleased to publish the second part of our special double issue on ‘ The Covid-19 Pandemic, Inequalities and Human Rights in South Africa ’ . We publish this in the wake of continuing evidence of the race, gender and class inequalities that were reflected, deepened and reproduced by the pandemic and by government responses to it. Research has continued to confirm the dire socio-economic and health consequences of the pandemic. Furthermore, it is increasingly argued that the deepening poverty and inequality under the epidemic 1 is, at least partly, due to the fact that successive lockdowns failed to account sufficiently for ‘ realities like poverty, food insecurity, gender-based violence and insecure housing ’ . 2 As we know, this tracks South Africa ’ s historic and deeply embedded lines of race, gender and class disadvantage. These high structural inequalities also shaped the increased risk of severe illness and death, arising out of Covid-19 infection, among black South Africans. 3 Since the start of the pandemic in early 2020, the publication of successive regulations under the Disaster Management Act 57 of 2002 and quite extensive litigation 4 has meant that the pandemic has been extensively regulated and governed through law.","PeriodicalId":44989,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal on Human Rights","volume":"37 1","pages":"437 - 441"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2021.2099560","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The South African Journal on Human Rights and the NRF South African Research Chair in Equality, Law and Social Justice are pleased to publish the second part of our special double issue on ‘ The Covid-19 Pandemic, Inequalities and Human Rights in South Africa ’ . We publish this in the wake of continuing evidence of the race, gender and class inequalities that were reflected, deepened and reproduced by the pandemic and by government responses to it. Research has continued to confirm the dire socio-economic and health consequences of the pandemic. Furthermore, it is increasingly argued that the deepening poverty and inequality under the epidemic 1 is, at least partly, due to the fact that successive lockdowns failed to account sufficiently for ‘ realities like poverty, food insecurity, gender-based violence and insecure housing ’ . 2 As we know, this tracks South Africa ’ s historic and deeply embedded lines of race, gender and class disadvantage. These high structural inequalities also shaped the increased risk of severe illness and death, arising out of Covid-19 infection, among black South Africans. 3 Since the start of the pandemic in early 2020, the publication of successive regulations under the Disaster Management Act 57 of 2002 and quite extensive litigation 4 has meant that the pandemic has been extensively regulated and governed through law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导言:关于“2019冠状病毒病大流行、南非的不平等和人权”的特刊,第二部分
《南非人权杂志》和国家自由基金会南非平等、法律和社会正义研究主席高兴地发表我们关于“新冠肺炎大流行、不平等和南非人权”的特刊的第二部分。我们发表这篇文章的背景是,不断有证据表明,大流行病和政府的应对措施反映、加深和再现了种族、性别和阶级不平等。研究继续证实,这一流行病造成了严重的社会经济和健康后果。此外,越来越多的人认为,疫情造成的贫困和不平等现象加剧,至少在一定程度上是由于连续的封锁未能充分考虑到“贫困、粮食不安全、基于性别的暴力和住房不安全等现实”。正如我们所知,这反映了南非历史上根深蒂固的种族、性别和阶级劣势。这些高度的结构性不平等也导致南非黑人因感染Covid-19而罹患严重疾病和死亡的风险增加。自2020年初大流行开始以来,根据2002年第57号《灾害管理法》颁布的连续条例以及相当广泛的诉讼4意味着,大流行已通过法律得到广泛监管和治理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
77.80%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Consulting citizens: Addressing the deficits in participatory democracy Ubuntu, human rights and sustainable development: Lessons from the African Arbitration Academy’s Model Bilateral Investment Treaty Research handbook on economic, social and cultural rights Augmentative and alternative communication in the South African justice system: Potential and pitfalls The importance of litigating the right to access sufficient food: Equal Education v Minister of Basic Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1