Experimental Comparison of Fibers and Nanomaterials in Compression Test and Cost of High Strength Concrete in Egypt

IF 1.1 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Civil and Environmental Engineering Pub Date : 2022-11-07 DOI:10.2478/cee-2022-0068
Ezzat Gazy Al-Hamad, A. Ragab, Mohamed Mohsen Elattar, D. Sadek
{"title":"Experimental Comparison of Fibers and Nanomaterials in Compression Test and Cost of High Strength Concrete in Egypt","authors":"Ezzat Gazy Al-Hamad, A. Ragab, Mohamed Mohsen Elattar, D. Sadek","doi":"10.2478/cee-2022-0068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The present work addresses conducting an experimental comparison between different types and dosages of fibers and nanomaterials in compressive tests and the cost of mixes for high-strength concrete (HSC). This study investigated the materials used in the construction sector in Egypt. The experimental work was carried out to select the optimum percentage of each type of the used nanomaterials, and fibers to achieve the highest compressive strength and low cost. In this work, nineteen concrete mixes were prepared. Nano silica (NS) and nano clay (NC) were used at 0, 1, 2, and 3 % by weight of cement. Also, nano- fumed silica (FS) was used at 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 %, while silica fume (SF) was used at 10 % by weight of cement. Each type of corrugated round steel fiber (STF), and polypropylene fibers (PPF) were used at 0.5, 0.75, and 1.00 % by concrete volume. The results indicated that the compressive strength of the HSC increases as the percentage of adding nano-fumed silica increases up to 3 % and the economic feasibility of nano-fumed silica in concrete is better than in other nanomaterials such as nano silica and nano clay. Also, using 1 % steel fiber in HSC increases concrete strength significantly compared to conventional concrete without considerably increasing the cost.","PeriodicalId":42034,"journal":{"name":"Civil and Environmental Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil and Environmental Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2022-0068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The present work addresses conducting an experimental comparison between different types and dosages of fibers and nanomaterials in compressive tests and the cost of mixes for high-strength concrete (HSC). This study investigated the materials used in the construction sector in Egypt. The experimental work was carried out to select the optimum percentage of each type of the used nanomaterials, and fibers to achieve the highest compressive strength and low cost. In this work, nineteen concrete mixes were prepared. Nano silica (NS) and nano clay (NC) were used at 0, 1, 2, and 3 % by weight of cement. Also, nano- fumed silica (FS) was used at 0, 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 %, while silica fume (SF) was used at 10 % by weight of cement. Each type of corrugated round steel fiber (STF), and polypropylene fibers (PPF) were used at 0.5, 0.75, and 1.00 % by concrete volume. The results indicated that the compressive strength of the HSC increases as the percentage of adding nano-fumed silica increases up to 3 % and the economic feasibility of nano-fumed silica in concrete is better than in other nanomaterials such as nano silica and nano clay. Also, using 1 % steel fiber in HSC increases concrete strength significantly compared to conventional concrete without considerably increasing the cost.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纤维和纳米材料在埃及高强混凝土抗压试验中的试验比较及成本
摘要:本文研究了不同类型和剂量的纤维和纳米材料在抗压测试中的实验比较以及高强度混凝土(HSC)混合料的成本。本研究调查了埃及建筑部门使用的材料。通过实验研究,选择各种纳米材料和纤维的最佳配比,以达到最高的抗压强度和较低的成本。在这项工作中,共制备了19种混凝土混合料。纳米二氧化硅(NS)和纳米粘土(NC)分别在水泥质量比为0、1、2和3%时使用。此外,纳米气相二氧化硅(FS)在0、1、2、3、5和10%的浓度下使用,而硅粉(SF)在水泥重量的10%时使用。每种波纹圆钢纤维(STF)和聚丙烯纤维(PPF)的用量分别为混凝土体积的0.5%,0.75和1.00 %。结果表明,当纳米硅粉掺量增加至3%时,混凝土的抗压强度有所提高,且纳米硅粉在混凝土中的经济可行性优于其他纳米材料如纳米硅粉和纳米粘土。此外,与传统混凝土相比,在HSC中使用1%的钢纤维可以显著提高混凝土强度,而不会显著增加成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
58.30%
发文量
69
期刊最新文献
Tensile Force Distribution And Development Within Geogrid-Reinforced Retaining Wall Evaluation of Bituminous Moisture Damage of High Silica Aggregate Research on the Long-Term Acoustic Efficiency of Asphalt Mixtures Using CRM in Test Sections of Slovak Roads Using Tuff and Limestone Sand to Minimize Water Consumption of Pavement Construction in Arid Regions Role of Real Estate Management Firms Toward Sustainability in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1