Historic settlements and pastoralism in the Arctic and Tibetan Plateau: towards a comparison

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Acta Borealia Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI:10.1080/08003831.2018.1457291
T. Bleie
{"title":"Historic settlements and pastoralism in the Arctic and Tibetan Plateau: towards a comparison","authors":"T. Bleie","doi":"10.1080/08003831.2018.1457291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Historic settlement processes of, respectively, the Northern Sámi and Western Tibetan pastoralists have so far not been subjected to any comparative social science analyses. This study contributes to such a conceptual platform, drawing on the constructs dwelling, settlement, herding unit, pastoral landscape and the labour–animal–pasture triangle. Ethnographic and archival evidence of transitions from sedentary/semi-sedentary to full-fledged pastoralist societies and transitions from a pastoral adaptation to sedentary and semi-sedentary life are analysed and debated in light of the influential theoretical proposition of a categorical difference between a nomad’s and a farmer’s dwelling. At the core of this, comparative inquiry is two highly dynamic pastoral herding societies. It is argued that a comparative approach to the study of settlements requires a theoretical and analytical reframing – informed by a more adequate comprehension of the dwelling–settlement nexus. This preliminary scrutiny of dwelling designs and settlement practices of Sámi and Tibetan pastoralists indicates that nomads in both regions internalized and activated different spatial models and inventively mediated between different spatial models according to seasonal or irreversible shifts of leaving the nomadic adaptation altogether. Further rigorous empirical inquiry into accommodation, innovation and possible failures to mediate gaps in the making/remaking of dwellings and settlements are called for.","PeriodicalId":44093,"journal":{"name":"Acta Borealia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08003831.2018.1457291","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Borealia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08003831.2018.1457291","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Historic settlement processes of, respectively, the Northern Sámi and Western Tibetan pastoralists have so far not been subjected to any comparative social science analyses. This study contributes to such a conceptual platform, drawing on the constructs dwelling, settlement, herding unit, pastoral landscape and the labour–animal–pasture triangle. Ethnographic and archival evidence of transitions from sedentary/semi-sedentary to full-fledged pastoralist societies and transitions from a pastoral adaptation to sedentary and semi-sedentary life are analysed and debated in light of the influential theoretical proposition of a categorical difference between a nomad’s and a farmer’s dwelling. At the core of this, comparative inquiry is two highly dynamic pastoral herding societies. It is argued that a comparative approach to the study of settlements requires a theoretical and analytical reframing – informed by a more adequate comprehension of the dwelling–settlement nexus. This preliminary scrutiny of dwelling designs and settlement practices of Sámi and Tibetan pastoralists indicates that nomads in both regions internalized and activated different spatial models and inventively mediated between different spatial models according to seasonal or irreversible shifts of leaving the nomadic adaptation altogether. Further rigorous empirical inquiry into accommodation, innovation and possible failures to mediate gaps in the making/remaking of dwellings and settlements are called for.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
北极和青藏高原的历史定居点与畜牧业:比较
西藏北部Sámi和西部牧民的历史定居过程迄今为止还没有任何比较的社会科学分析。本研究通过构建住宅、聚落、放牧单元、田园景观和劳动-动物-牧场三角关系,为这样一个概念平台做出了贡献。从定居/半定居到成熟的游牧社会过渡的民族志和档案证据,以及从游牧适应到定居和半定居生活的过渡,根据有影响力的理论命题,即游牧和农民居住之间的绝对差异,进行了分析和辩论。比较研究的核心是两个高度动态的牧区社会。有人认为,用比较的方法研究住区需要在理论上和分析上进行重新规划- -对住区关系有更充分的了解。对Sámi和西藏牧民居住设计和定居实践的初步考察表明,这两个地区的牧民内化和激活了不同的空间模式,并根据完全离开游牧适应的季节性或不可逆转的转变,创造性地在不同的空间模式之间进行调解。需要对住房、创新和可能未能调解住房和住区建造/重建中的差距进行进一步严格的实证调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Borealia
Acta Borealia HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Sustaining local practices: introductory remarks Learning to relocalize: institutional entrepreneurs as transformative agents in public food services Premodern handcraft skills foster a language which opens an experiential pathway to local nature Disclosing the sacred in technological practices for sustainability Peripheral sustainability expertise on technology: an autoethnography amidst the polycrisis*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1