Jung’s and Groddeck’s Analytic Practice

Marco Balenci
{"title":"Jung’s and Groddeck’s Analytic Practice","authors":"Marco Balenci","doi":"10.1163/19409060-BJA10010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper shows that Georg Groddeck and Carl Gustav Jung shared a common cultural background, in which Carl Gustav Carus’s theory of the psyche was preeminent. Accordingly, they emphasized symbolization and unconscious creativity. These aspects affected their clinical work, aimed at pioneering therapies: Jung with schizophrenics, Groddeck treating physical diseases. They overcame the limits of the psychoanalysis of their time and, going beyond neurosis, discovered the pre-Oedipal period and the fundamental role of mother-child relationship. While Freud’s technique was based on a one-person paradigm, both Jung and Groddeck considered analytic therapy as a dialectical process, ushering in a two-person paradigm. Therefore, they did not use the couch; a setting that is assessed in the light of recent research on mirror neurons. It is also highlighted that the analytic groups influenced by Groddeck and Jung have developed similar ideas in both theory and technique; a fact that may induce further studies on the history of depth psychology.","PeriodicalId":38977,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Jungian Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Jungian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/19409060-BJA10010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper shows that Georg Groddeck and Carl Gustav Jung shared a common cultural background, in which Carl Gustav Carus’s theory of the psyche was preeminent. Accordingly, they emphasized symbolization and unconscious creativity. These aspects affected their clinical work, aimed at pioneering therapies: Jung with schizophrenics, Groddeck treating physical diseases. They overcame the limits of the psychoanalysis of their time and, going beyond neurosis, discovered the pre-Oedipal period and the fundamental role of mother-child relationship. While Freud’s technique was based on a one-person paradigm, both Jung and Groddeck considered analytic therapy as a dialectical process, ushering in a two-person paradigm. Therefore, they did not use the couch; a setting that is assessed in the light of recent research on mirror neurons. It is also highlighted that the analytic groups influenced by Groddeck and Jung have developed similar ideas in both theory and technique; a fact that may induce further studies on the history of depth psychology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荣格和格罗德克的分析实践
格罗德克和荣格有着共同的文化背景,其中卡尔·古斯塔夫·卡鲁斯的心理理论最为突出。因此,他们强调符号化和无意识的创造力。这些方面影响了他们的临床工作,旨在开拓治疗方法:荣格治疗精神分裂症,格罗德克治疗身体疾病。他们克服了当时精神分析的局限,超越了神经症,发现了前俄狄浦斯时期和母子关系的基本作用。弗洛伊德的技术是基于一个人的范式,而荣格和格罗德克都认为分析治疗是一个辩证的过程,开创了一个两人的范式。因此,他们不用沙发;这是根据最近对镜像神经元的研究来评估的。本文还强调,受格罗德克和荣格影响的分析群体在理论和技术上都有类似的想法;这一事实可能会引发对深度心理学历史的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Jungian Studies
International Journal of Jungian Studies Psychology-Applied Psychology
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
A Brief History of the Development of Modern Psychological Astrology Dual-Aspect Monism and the Deep Structure of Meaning, by Atmanspacher, H., & Rickles, D. Jungian Psycho-Social Studies Rethinking Jung’s Reception of Kant and the Naturphilosophen Uniquely Creative Together
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1