Development and Reliability of a Questionnaire Assessing Stress, Coping, and Empathy (SCOPE) in Occupational Settings: Preliminary Evidence from Veterinarians

IF 1.2 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Psychiatry international Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.3390/psychiatryint3040029
G. Di Gennaro, Y. Pigaiani, Anastasia Zocca, M. Balestrieri, M. Colizzi
{"title":"Development and Reliability of a Questionnaire Assessing Stress, Coping, and Empathy (SCOPE) in Occupational Settings: Preliminary Evidence from Veterinarians","authors":"G. Di Gennaro, Y. Pigaiani, Anastasia Zocca, M. Balestrieri, M. Colizzi","doi":"10.3390/psychiatryint3040029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Workplaces can be associated with occupational stress, detrimental consequences in terms of loss of health and reduced psychosocial well-being. Importantly, employees may be particularly at risk of poorer well-being during times of adversity at work, when not able to apply adaptive coping strategies and adopt a more empathetic approach. This study aimed to develop a scale to estimate occupational stress both in terms of situational and individual components, by performing item selection, internal reliability assessment, and investigation of the ceiling/floor effect. The target population consisted of veterinarians (n = 116), based on evidence of high risk of occupational stress and related mental distress. Out of twenty initial candidate entries, exploratory factor analysis retained fifteen items consisting of three domains related to occupational stress, copying strategies, and empathy (SCOPE). The SCOPE scale demonstrated good internal consistency as a whole (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.79) and when considering the three subscales (stress, 0.85; coping, 0.77; and empathy, 0.71). On a possible range from 15 (worst adjustment) to 75 (best adjustment), the sample mean performance was 51.68 (SD, 8.50). Preliminary evidence indicated that the SCOPE questionnaire may reveal differential effects of type of work on levels of occupational stress and related coping and empathy skills.","PeriodicalId":93808,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/psychiatryint3040029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Workplaces can be associated with occupational stress, detrimental consequences in terms of loss of health and reduced psychosocial well-being. Importantly, employees may be particularly at risk of poorer well-being during times of adversity at work, when not able to apply adaptive coping strategies and adopt a more empathetic approach. This study aimed to develop a scale to estimate occupational stress both in terms of situational and individual components, by performing item selection, internal reliability assessment, and investigation of the ceiling/floor effect. The target population consisted of veterinarians (n = 116), based on evidence of high risk of occupational stress and related mental distress. Out of twenty initial candidate entries, exploratory factor analysis retained fifteen items consisting of three domains related to occupational stress, copying strategies, and empathy (SCOPE). The SCOPE scale demonstrated good internal consistency as a whole (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.79) and when considering the three subscales (stress, 0.85; coping, 0.77; and empathy, 0.71). On a possible range from 15 (worst adjustment) to 75 (best adjustment), the sample mean performance was 51.68 (SD, 8.50). Preliminary evidence indicated that the SCOPE questionnaire may reveal differential effects of type of work on levels of occupational stress and related coping and empathy skills.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职业环境中压力、应对和共情(SCOPE)评估问卷的开发和可靠性:来自兽医的初步证据
工作场所可能与职业压力、健康损失的有害后果和心理健康状况的降低有关。重要的是,当员工在工作中遇到逆境时,如果不能应用适应性的应对策略并采取更具同理心的方法,他们的幸福感可能会特别差。本研究旨在通过进行项目选择、内部可靠性评估和天花板/地板效应调查,开发一种从情境和个人组成部分来评估职业压力的量表。根据职业压力和相关精神痛苦的高风险证据,目标人群由兽医组成(n=116)。在20个最初的候选人条目中,探索性因素分析保留了15个条目,包括与职业压力、复制策略和同理心(SCOPE)相关的三个领域。SCOPE量表总体上表现出良好的内部一致性(Cronbachα=0.79),在考虑三个分量表(压力0.85;应对0.77;移情0.71)时。在15(最差调整)到75(最佳调整)的可能范围内,样本平均表现为51.68(SD,8.50)。初步证据表明,SCOPE问卷可能揭示了工作类型对职业压力水平以及相关应对和移情技能的不同影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Role of Dark Personality Traits in Embitterment–Jealousy Dynamics: Insights from a Multi-Scale Analysis and Moderation Effects Modifications to Enhance Outcomes of Family-Based Treatment for Anorexia Nervosa: A Scoping Review How Moral Distress Contributes to Depression Varies by Gender in a Sample of Sub-Saharan African Nurses Violence and Child Mental Health Outcomes in Iraq: Mapping Vulnerable Areas Tangram Puzzles in Patients with Neurocognitive Disorders: A Pilot Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1