COLLABORATIVE POLICY-MAKING, LAW STUDENTS, AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE: THE REWARDS OF DESTABILIZING INSTITUTIONAL PATTERNS

Brea Lowenberger, Michaela Keet, Janelle Anderson
{"title":"COLLABORATIVE POLICY-MAKING, LAW STUDENTS, AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE: THE REWARDS OF DESTABILIZING INSTITUTIONAL PATTERNS","authors":"Brea Lowenberger, Michaela Keet, Janelle Anderson","doi":"10.22329/WYAJ.V34I1.5010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Heightened concerns and dialogue about access to justice have infused the law school setting in Saskatchewan and, to varying degrees, across the country. If there ever were a time to approach social justice reform differently – to upset traditional parameters around decision making and step around older hierarchies for input and design – it would be now. This article describes the Dean’s Forum on Dispute Resolution and Access to Justice (colloquially known as the Dean’s Forum) as a platform for genuine student engagement in the development of public policy in this important area. We offer our combined reflections, gathered inside our “teaching team,” about the unique pedagogical features of our experiment and its challenges. As we continue to grow with the project, we offer this Saskatchewan story as one example of institutional collaboration in a quickly evolving educational and social policy landscape. L’acces a la justice est une preoccupation croissante et un theme de plus en plus recurrent dans les facultes de droit de la Saskatchewan et, a differents degres, de l’ensemble du pays. Le temps est venu, semble-t-il, d’aborder la reforme de la justice sociale differemment, de bouleverser les parametres traditionnels gravitant autour de la prise de decisions et de contourner les hierarchies plus anciennes en ce qui concerne les donnees et les concepts. Cet article porte sur le forum du doyen concernant le reglement des conflits et l’acces a la justice (familierement appele le Dean’s Forum (forum du doyen)) comme plateforme pour la participation des etudiants a l’elaboration des politiques publiques dans cet important domaine. Nous presentons l’ensemble des reflexions de notre equipe d’enseignants au sujet des elements pedagogiques uniques de notre experience et des difficultes connexes. Nous continuons a grandir avec notre projet, mais nous souhaitions decrire des maintenant cette experience vecue en Saskatchewan a titre d’exemple de collaboration institutionnelle dans un contexte dans lequel les politiques educationnelles et sociales ne cessent d’evoluer.","PeriodicalId":56232,"journal":{"name":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","volume":"34 1","pages":"148-174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22329/WYAJ.V34I1.5010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Heightened concerns and dialogue about access to justice have infused the law school setting in Saskatchewan and, to varying degrees, across the country. If there ever were a time to approach social justice reform differently – to upset traditional parameters around decision making and step around older hierarchies for input and design – it would be now. This article describes the Dean’s Forum on Dispute Resolution and Access to Justice (colloquially known as the Dean’s Forum) as a platform for genuine student engagement in the development of public policy in this important area. We offer our combined reflections, gathered inside our “teaching team,” about the unique pedagogical features of our experiment and its challenges. As we continue to grow with the project, we offer this Saskatchewan story as one example of institutional collaboration in a quickly evolving educational and social policy landscape. L’acces a la justice est une preoccupation croissante et un theme de plus en plus recurrent dans les facultes de droit de la Saskatchewan et, a differents degres, de l’ensemble du pays. Le temps est venu, semble-t-il, d’aborder la reforme de la justice sociale differemment, de bouleverser les parametres traditionnels gravitant autour de la prise de decisions et de contourner les hierarchies plus anciennes en ce qui concerne les donnees et les concepts. Cet article porte sur le forum du doyen concernant le reglement des conflits et l’acces a la justice (familierement appele le Dean’s Forum (forum du doyen)) comme plateforme pour la participation des etudiants a l’elaboration des politiques publiques dans cet important domaine. Nous presentons l’ensemble des reflexions de notre equipe d’enseignants au sujet des elements pedagogiques uniques de notre experience et des difficultes connexes. Nous continuons a grandir avec notre projet, mais nous souhaitions decrire des maintenant cette experience vecue en Saskatchewan a titre d’exemple de collaboration institutionnelle dans un contexte dans lequel les politiques educationnelles et sociales ne cessent d’evoluer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合作决策、法律专业学生和诉诸司法:破坏稳定的制度模式的回报
在萨斯喀彻温省的法学院环境中,以及在不同程度上,对诉诸司法的高度关注和对话已经渗透到全国各地。如果说有什么时候应该以不同的方式进行社会正义改革——打破围绕决策制定的传统参数,绕过旧有的投入和设计等级制度——那就是现在。本文描述了院长争议解决和诉诸司法论坛(俗称院长论坛),作为一个真正的学生参与这一重要领域公共政策发展的平台。我们提供了我们在“教学团队”中收集的关于我们实验的独特教学特征及其挑战的综合思考。随着项目的不断发展,我们将萨斯喀彻温省的故事作为快速发展的教育和社会政策环境中机构合作的一个例子。“我的正义之路”是一种专注的职业,“我的正义之路”是“我的正义之路”,“我的正义之路”是“我的正义之路”,“我的正义之路”是“我的正义之路”,“我的正义之路”是“我的正义之路”。“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”,“时间”。关于冲突管理和院长论坛(院长论坛)的条款porte sur le le forum du doyen(院长论坛))为学生的参与提供了平台,为政治和公共事务的阐述提供了平台,这是重要的领域。现在,我们要展示的是,我们的整体,我们的反思,我们的设备,我们的主题,我们的要素,我们的独特的教学方法,我们的经验和我们的困难联系。我们继续进行一个伟大的教育项目,主要的教育机构要求我们保持良好的经验,在萨斯喀彻温省,我们建立了一个合作的范例,机构、背景、政治、教育、社会和发展的范例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Swimming Up Niagara Falls! The Battle to Get Disability Rights Added to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms The Triumph of the “Therapeutic” in Quebec Courts: Mental Health, Behavioural Reform and the Decline of Rights The Influence of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on Canadian Jurisprudence in the First Decade Since its Ratification Students in Name Only: Improving the Working Conditions of Articled Students Via the Application of the BC Employment Standards Act People With Disabilities Need Lawyers Too! A Ready-To-Use Plan for Law Schools to Educate Law Students to Effectively Serve the Legal Needs of Clients With Disabilities as Well as Clients Without Disabilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1