Extraperitoneal approach robotic-assisted urethra-sparing simple prostatectomy for large-gland benign prostatic hyperplasia: initial experience

F. Qu, Gu-tian Zhang, Yongming Deng, Jing Liang, Ning Liu, Rong Yang, Linfeng Xu, Xiaogong Li, W. Gan
{"title":"Extraperitoneal approach robotic-assisted urethra-sparing simple prostatectomy for large-gland benign prostatic hyperplasia: initial experience","authors":"F. Qu, Gu-tian Zhang, Yongming Deng, Jing Liang, Ning Liu, Rong Yang, Linfeng Xu, Xiaogong Li, W. Gan","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2019.10.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo report our initial experience with extraperitoneal approach Robotic-Assisted Urethra-sparing simple prostatectomy(US-RASP)on large-gland (>100 ml) benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH). \n \n \nMethods \nFrom August 2015 to April 2018, 32 patients with large volume prostate underwent US-RASP performed by single surgical team were retrospectively reviewed. The patient's median age was 73 (range 59-80) years, and median BMI was 24.9 (19.3-34.8 ) kg/m2, The estimated prostate volume(V), postvoid residual volume(PV) by transrectal ultrasonography and PSA were 152.0(119.0-223.1)ml, 145(0-280)ml and 13.7(5.2-27.3)ng/ml, respectively. Four of 32 patients underwent preoperative urinary catheterization. The perioperative functional parameters including international prostate symptom score (IPSS) questionnaire, maximum flow rate (Qmax), maximum voided volume(Vmax), quality of life questionnaires (QOL) and International Index of erectile function-erectile function (IIEF-EF) were 27(23-33), 5.9 (2.5-7.8) ml/s, 110 (80-210)ml, 5(3-6), and 27(26-29), respectively. Functional parameters including IPSS, QOL, Qmax, Vmax, PV and IIEF-EF were compared and analyzed at 3 and 12 months postoperatively during the following-up. \n \n \nResults \nThe US-RASP was completed in all 32 patients and no open conversion. Median operation time was 180 (115-240) min, the estimated blood loss was 300(range 100 to 400)ml, Hemoglobin loss was 17(5-38)g/L. The median Foley catheterization time was 7 (5-12) days and drainage was removed after a median of 5 (4-7) days with median hospital stay of 8(6-14)days. Median specimen weight on pathological examination was 107.7 (79.8-147.4)g with median of 64.2% (49.4%-86.2%) resection ratio. At 3-mo follow-up, median IPSS score, Qmax, Vmax, PV and QOL were 6(4-18), 17.3 (13.8-21.1)ml/s, 167(140-310)ml, 50(0-61)ml, 1(0-3) , respectively. At 12-mo follow-up, median IPSS score, Qmax, Vmax, PV and QOL were 4(1-9), 20.1 (17.9-24.1)ml/s, 205(176-305)ml, 24(0-35)ml and 1(0-2) , respectively. All patients showed great improvement of IPSS, Qmax, Vmax, PV and QOL after median 17 (12-44) months follow-up compared with preoperative parameters (P<0.05). Erectile function was not impaired in 17 patients who have normal erectile function pre-operatively and 14 cases (82.4%) preserved satisfactory anterograde ejaculation. No significant complication occurred during the procedure. No patient developed permanent urinary incontinence. \n \n \nConclusions \nUS-RASP is a safe and effective treatment option for selected patients with large-gland obstructive BPH(>100 ml). Our data showed significant improvement in voiding function and maintaining satisfactory anterograde ejaculation following urethral-sparing technique. It may be a new alternative method in the future for large-volume symptomatic BPH. \n \n \nKey words: \nProstatic hyperplasia; Prostatectomy; Robotic-assisted surgery; Extraperitoneal approach; Urethra-sparing","PeriodicalId":10343,"journal":{"name":"中华泌尿外科杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华泌尿外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1000-6702.2019.10.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To report our initial experience with extraperitoneal approach Robotic-Assisted Urethra-sparing simple prostatectomy(US-RASP)on large-gland (>100 ml) benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH). Methods From August 2015 to April 2018, 32 patients with large volume prostate underwent US-RASP performed by single surgical team were retrospectively reviewed. The patient's median age was 73 (range 59-80) years, and median BMI was 24.9 (19.3-34.8 ) kg/m2, The estimated prostate volume(V), postvoid residual volume(PV) by transrectal ultrasonography and PSA were 152.0(119.0-223.1)ml, 145(0-280)ml and 13.7(5.2-27.3)ng/ml, respectively. Four of 32 patients underwent preoperative urinary catheterization. The perioperative functional parameters including international prostate symptom score (IPSS) questionnaire, maximum flow rate (Qmax), maximum voided volume(Vmax), quality of life questionnaires (QOL) and International Index of erectile function-erectile function (IIEF-EF) were 27(23-33), 5.9 (2.5-7.8) ml/s, 110 (80-210)ml, 5(3-6), and 27(26-29), respectively. Functional parameters including IPSS, QOL, Qmax, Vmax, PV and IIEF-EF were compared and analyzed at 3 and 12 months postoperatively during the following-up. Results The US-RASP was completed in all 32 patients and no open conversion. Median operation time was 180 (115-240) min, the estimated blood loss was 300(range 100 to 400)ml, Hemoglobin loss was 17(5-38)g/L. The median Foley catheterization time was 7 (5-12) days and drainage was removed after a median of 5 (4-7) days with median hospital stay of 8(6-14)days. Median specimen weight on pathological examination was 107.7 (79.8-147.4)g with median of 64.2% (49.4%-86.2%) resection ratio. At 3-mo follow-up, median IPSS score, Qmax, Vmax, PV and QOL were 6(4-18), 17.3 (13.8-21.1)ml/s, 167(140-310)ml, 50(0-61)ml, 1(0-3) , respectively. At 12-mo follow-up, median IPSS score, Qmax, Vmax, PV and QOL were 4(1-9), 20.1 (17.9-24.1)ml/s, 205(176-305)ml, 24(0-35)ml and 1(0-2) , respectively. All patients showed great improvement of IPSS, Qmax, Vmax, PV and QOL after median 17 (12-44) months follow-up compared with preoperative parameters (P<0.05). Erectile function was not impaired in 17 patients who have normal erectile function pre-operatively and 14 cases (82.4%) preserved satisfactory anterograde ejaculation. No significant complication occurred during the procedure. No patient developed permanent urinary incontinence. Conclusions US-RASP is a safe and effective treatment option for selected patients with large-gland obstructive BPH(>100 ml). Our data showed significant improvement in voiding function and maintaining satisfactory anterograde ejaculation following urethral-sparing technique. It may be a new alternative method in the future for large-volume symptomatic BPH. Key words: Prostatic hyperplasia; Prostatectomy; Robotic-assisted surgery; Extraperitoneal approach; Urethra-sparing
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹膜外入路机器人辅助保留尿道的前列腺切除术治疗大腺体良性前列腺增生症的初步经验
目的报告腹腔外入路机器人辅助保留尿道前列腺切除术(US-RASP)治疗大腺体(> 100ml)良性前列腺增生(BPH)的初步经验。方法回顾性分析2015年8月至2018年4月单手术组行US-RASP治疗的32例大体积前列腺患者。患者年龄中位数为73岁(59 ~ 80岁),BMI中位数为24.9 (19.3 ~ 34.8)kg/m2,经直肠超声和PSA估计前列腺体积(V) 152.0(119.0 ~ 223.1)ml,空后残留体积(PV) 145(0 ~ 280)ml, 13.7(5.2 ~ 27.3)ng/ml。32例患者中有4例行术前导尿。围手术期功能参数包括国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)问卷、最大流量(Qmax)、最大排尿量(Vmax)、生活质量问卷(QOL)和国际勃起功能指数(IIEF-EF)分别为27(23-33)、5.9 (2.5-7.8)ml/s、110 (80-210)ml、5(3-6)、27(26-29)。比较分析术后3个月和12个月IPSS、QOL、Qmax、Vmax、PV、IIEF-EF等功能参数。结果32例患者均完成US-RASP检查,无开放性转换。中位手术时间180 (115-240)min,估计失血量300(100 - 400)ml,血红蛋白损失17(5-38)g/L。Foley置管时间中位数为7(5-12)天,引流时间中位数为5(4-7)天,住院时间中位数为8(6-14)天。病理检查标本重量中位数为107.7 (79.8 ~ 147.4)g,切除率中位数为64.2%(49.4% ~ 86.2%)。随访3个月,中位IPSS评分、Qmax、Vmax、PV和QOL分别为6(4-18)、17.3 (13.8-21.1)ml/s、167(140-310)ml、50(0-61)ml、1(0-3)。随访12个月,中位IPSS评分、Qmax、Vmax、PV和QOL分别为4(1-9)、20.1 (17.9-24.1)ml/s、205(176-305)ml、24(0-35)ml和1(0-2)。中位随访17(12-44)个月后,患者IPSS、Qmax、Vmax、PV和QOL均较术前指标(P100 ml)有明显改善。我们的数据显示,在尿道保留技术后,患者的排尿功能有了显著的改善,并保持了满意的顺行射精。它可能是未来治疗大面积症状性前列腺增生的一种新的替代方法。关键词:前列腺增生;前列腺切除术;机器人手术;Extraperitoneal方法;Urethra-sparing
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华泌尿外科杂志
中华泌尿外科杂志 Medicine-Nephrology
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14180
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Urology (monthly) was founded in 1980. It is a publicly issued academic journal supervised by the China Association for Science and Technology and sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association. It mainly publishes original research papers, reviews and comments in this field. This journal mainly reports on the latest scientific research results and clinical diagnosis and treatment experience in the professional field of urology at home and abroad, as well as basic theoretical research results closely related to clinical practice. The journal has columns such as treatises, abstracts of treatises, experimental studies, case reports, experience exchanges, reviews, reviews, lectures, etc. Chinese Journal of Urology has been included in well-known databases such as Peking University Journal (Chinese Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences), CSCD Chinese Science Citation Database Source Journal (including extended version), and also included in American Chemical Abstracts (CA). The journal has been rated as a quality journal by the Association for Science and Technology and as an excellent journal by the Chinese Medical Association.
期刊最新文献
Clinical application of different bladder neck separation techniques in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy Analysis of risk factors for acute kidney injury after radical nephrectomy Characteristics of urinary microflora in women with type 2 diabetic peripheral neuropathy without lower urinary tract symptoms A case report of primary leiomyosarcoma of the spermatic cord Establishment and validation of nomogram for positive surgical margin of prostate cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1