{"title":"Investigation of mechanical ventilation pressure parameters’ effect on the prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome","authors":"Wenbo Zhang, Yu Jiang, Xiao-wei Liu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-0282.2020.01.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo find out whether we can get the optimality in the prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by combing the pressure parameters in mechanical ventilation with traditional PaO2/FiO2. \n \n \nMethods \nThis is a retrospective study. Patients included here were diagnosed as ARDS in the Emergency Unit (EICU) of the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University from January 2018 to December 2018. All the patients were intubated and mechanically ventilated. Patients with a short observation time (< 48 h) or unable to cooperate with treatment were excluded. According to the patient's 28-day survival, patients were divided into the survival and non-survival groups. Parameters in the two groups such as basic characteristics, SOFA score, non-respiratory system SOFA score (nR-SOFA), and PaO2/FiO2 were analyzed with LSD-t test or rank sum test. Simultaneously, plateau pressure, driving pressure, mean airway pressure and the ratio of these mechanical ventilation pressure parameters to the PaO2/FiO2 were also analyzed. \n \n \nResults \nA total of 147 patients were included in the study and 117 of them were analyzed. The overall 28-day mortality was 31.62% (n=37). There were no significant differences in gender, age, body mass index, initial arterial oxygen partial pressure and carbon dioxide partial pressure between the survival group and non-survival groups (P >0.05). But there was a significant difference in SOFA score(6.53 ± 2.96 vs 8.65 ± 3.00) and nR -SOFA(3.44 ± 2.98 vs 5.27 ± 2.86). Among the evaluation indexes, the PPOI obtained the AUC of 0.828, with the sensitivity of 86.5%, and specificity of 71.2%.The AUC of the SOFA score was 0.707, while the AUC of the PPOI combined with the SOFA score was 0.833. \n \n \nConclusion \nMechanical ventilation pressure parameters can be used to predict the prognosis of patients with ARDS. PPOI may evaluate the prognosis of ARDS in a more simple, timely and real-time manner. \n \n \nKey words: \nAcute respiratory distress syndrome; Plateau pressure; Driving pressure; Mean airway pressure; Plateau pressure oxygenation index; Prognosis","PeriodicalId":9981,"journal":{"name":"中华急诊医学杂志","volume":"29 1","pages":"121-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华急诊医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-0282.2020.01.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective
To find out whether we can get the optimality in the prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by combing the pressure parameters in mechanical ventilation with traditional PaO2/FiO2.
Methods
This is a retrospective study. Patients included here were diagnosed as ARDS in the Emergency Unit (EICU) of the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University from January 2018 to December 2018. All the patients were intubated and mechanically ventilated. Patients with a short observation time (< 48 h) or unable to cooperate with treatment were excluded. According to the patient's 28-day survival, patients were divided into the survival and non-survival groups. Parameters in the two groups such as basic characteristics, SOFA score, non-respiratory system SOFA score (nR-SOFA), and PaO2/FiO2 were analyzed with LSD-t test or rank sum test. Simultaneously, plateau pressure, driving pressure, mean airway pressure and the ratio of these mechanical ventilation pressure parameters to the PaO2/FiO2 were also analyzed.
Results
A total of 147 patients were included in the study and 117 of them were analyzed. The overall 28-day mortality was 31.62% (n=37). There were no significant differences in gender, age, body mass index, initial arterial oxygen partial pressure and carbon dioxide partial pressure between the survival group and non-survival groups (P >0.05). But there was a significant difference in SOFA score(6.53 ± 2.96 vs 8.65 ± 3.00) and nR -SOFA(3.44 ± 2.98 vs 5.27 ± 2.86). Among the evaluation indexes, the PPOI obtained the AUC of 0.828, with the sensitivity of 86.5%, and specificity of 71.2%.The AUC of the SOFA score was 0.707, while the AUC of the PPOI combined with the SOFA score was 0.833.
Conclusion
Mechanical ventilation pressure parameters can be used to predict the prognosis of patients with ARDS. PPOI may evaluate the prognosis of ARDS in a more simple, timely and real-time manner.
Key words:
Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Plateau pressure; Driving pressure; Mean airway pressure; Plateau pressure oxygenation index; Prognosis
目的将机械通气中的压力参数与传统的PaO2/FiO2相结合,探讨是否能使急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的预后达到最佳。方法回顾性研究。本文纳入的患者于2018年1月至2018年12月在中国医科大学第一附属医院急诊科(EICU)被诊断为ARDS。所有患者均进行了插管和机械通气。排除观察时间短(<48小时)或无法配合治疗的患者。根据患者的28天生存率,将患者分为存活组和非存活组。采用LSD-t检验或秩和检验对两组患者的基本特征、SOFA评分、非呼吸系统SOFA评分(nR-SOFA)、PaO2/FiO2等参数进行分析。同时,还分析了高原压力、驾驶压力、平均气道压力以及这些机械通气压力参数与PaO2/FiO2的比值。结果本研究共纳入147例患者,对其中117例患者进行了分析。28天的总死亡率为31.62%(n=37)。存活组和非存活组在性别、年龄、体重指数、初始动脉氧分压和二氧化碳分压方面无显著差异(P>0.05),但SOFA评分(6.53±2.96 vs 8.65±3.00)和nR-SOFA评分有显著差异(3.44±2.98 vs 5.27±2.86),PPOI的AUC为0.828,敏感性为86.5%,特异性为71.2%。SOFA评分的AUC是0.707,而PPOI与SOFA评分组合的AUC则是0.833。结论机械通气压力参数可用于预测ARDS患者的预后。PPOI可以更简单、及时、实时地评估ARDS的预后。关键词:急性呼吸窘迫综合征;高原压力;驱动压力;平均气道压力;高原压力氧合指数;预后
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine is the only national journal which represents the development of emergency medicine in China. The journal is supervised by China Association of Science and Technology, sponsored by Chinese Medical Association, and co-sponsored by Zhejiang University. The journal publishes original research articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research in emergency medicine. The columns include Pre-Hospital Rescue, Emergency Care, Trauma, Resuscitation, Poisoning, Disaster Medicine, Continuing Education, etc. It has a wide coverage in China, and builds up communication with Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan and international emergency medicine circles.