Investigation of mechanical ventilation pressure parameters’ effect on the prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome

Wenbo Zhang, Yu Jiang, Xiao-wei Liu
{"title":"Investigation of mechanical ventilation pressure parameters’ effect on the prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome","authors":"Wenbo Zhang, Yu Jiang, Xiao-wei Liu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-0282.2020.01.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo find out whether we can get the optimality in the prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by combing the pressure parameters in mechanical ventilation with traditional PaO2/FiO2. \n \n \nMethods \nThis is a retrospective study. Patients included here were diagnosed as ARDS in the Emergency Unit (EICU) of the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University from January 2018 to December 2018. All the patients were intubated and mechanically ventilated. Patients with a short observation time (< 48 h) or unable to cooperate with treatment were excluded. According to the patient's 28-day survival, patients were divided into the survival and non-survival groups. Parameters in the two groups such as basic characteristics, SOFA score, non-respiratory system SOFA score (nR-SOFA), and PaO2/FiO2 were analyzed with LSD-t test or rank sum test. Simultaneously, plateau pressure, driving pressure, mean airway pressure and the ratio of these mechanical ventilation pressure parameters to the PaO2/FiO2 were also analyzed. \n \n \nResults \nA total of 147 patients were included in the study and 117 of them were analyzed. The overall 28-day mortality was 31.62% (n=37). There were no significant differences in gender, age, body mass index, initial arterial oxygen partial pressure and carbon dioxide partial pressure between the survival group and non-survival groups (P >0.05). But there was a significant difference in SOFA score(6.53 ± 2.96 vs 8.65 ± 3.00) and nR -SOFA(3.44 ± 2.98 vs 5.27 ± 2.86). Among the evaluation indexes, the PPOI obtained the AUC of 0.828, with the sensitivity of 86.5%, and specificity of 71.2%.The AUC of the SOFA score was 0.707, while the AUC of the PPOI combined with the SOFA score was 0.833. \n \n \nConclusion \nMechanical ventilation pressure parameters can be used to predict the prognosis of patients with ARDS. PPOI may evaluate the prognosis of ARDS in a more simple, timely and real-time manner. \n \n \nKey words: \nAcute respiratory distress syndrome; Plateau pressure; Driving pressure; Mean airway pressure; Plateau pressure oxygenation index; Prognosis","PeriodicalId":9981,"journal":{"name":"中华急诊医学杂志","volume":"29 1","pages":"121-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华急诊医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-0282.2020.01.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective To find out whether we can get the optimality in the prognosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by combing the pressure parameters in mechanical ventilation with traditional PaO2/FiO2. Methods This is a retrospective study. Patients included here were diagnosed as ARDS in the Emergency Unit (EICU) of the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University from January 2018 to December 2018. All the patients were intubated and mechanically ventilated. Patients with a short observation time (< 48 h) or unable to cooperate with treatment were excluded. According to the patient's 28-day survival, patients were divided into the survival and non-survival groups. Parameters in the two groups such as basic characteristics, SOFA score, non-respiratory system SOFA score (nR-SOFA), and PaO2/FiO2 were analyzed with LSD-t test or rank sum test. Simultaneously, plateau pressure, driving pressure, mean airway pressure and the ratio of these mechanical ventilation pressure parameters to the PaO2/FiO2 were also analyzed. Results A total of 147 patients were included in the study and 117 of them were analyzed. The overall 28-day mortality was 31.62% (n=37). There were no significant differences in gender, age, body mass index, initial arterial oxygen partial pressure and carbon dioxide partial pressure between the survival group and non-survival groups (P >0.05). But there was a significant difference in SOFA score(6.53 ± 2.96 vs 8.65 ± 3.00) and nR -SOFA(3.44 ± 2.98 vs 5.27 ± 2.86). Among the evaluation indexes, the PPOI obtained the AUC of 0.828, with the sensitivity of 86.5%, and specificity of 71.2%.The AUC of the SOFA score was 0.707, while the AUC of the PPOI combined with the SOFA score was 0.833. Conclusion Mechanical ventilation pressure parameters can be used to predict the prognosis of patients with ARDS. PPOI may evaluate the prognosis of ARDS in a more simple, timely and real-time manner. Key words: Acute respiratory distress syndrome; Plateau pressure; Driving pressure; Mean airway pressure; Plateau pressure oxygenation index; Prognosis
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机械通气压力参数对急性呼吸窘迫综合征预后影响的研究
目的将机械通气中的压力参数与传统的PaO2/FiO2相结合,探讨是否能使急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的预后达到最佳。方法回顾性研究。本文纳入的患者于2018年1月至2018年12月在中国医科大学第一附属医院急诊科(EICU)被诊断为ARDS。所有患者均进行了插管和机械通气。排除观察时间短(<48小时)或无法配合治疗的患者。根据患者的28天生存率,将患者分为存活组和非存活组。采用LSD-t检验或秩和检验对两组患者的基本特征、SOFA评分、非呼吸系统SOFA评分(nR-SOFA)、PaO2/FiO2等参数进行分析。同时,还分析了高原压力、驾驶压力、平均气道压力以及这些机械通气压力参数与PaO2/FiO2的比值。结果本研究共纳入147例患者,对其中117例患者进行了分析。28天的总死亡率为31.62%(n=37)。存活组和非存活组在性别、年龄、体重指数、初始动脉氧分压和二氧化碳分压方面无显著差异(P>0.05),但SOFA评分(6.53±2.96 vs 8.65±3.00)和nR-SOFA评分有显著差异(3.44±2.98 vs 5.27±2.86),PPOI的AUC为0.828,敏感性为86.5%,特异性为71.2%。SOFA评分的AUC是0.707,而PPOI与SOFA评分组合的AUC则是0.833。结论机械通气压力参数可用于预测ARDS患者的预后。PPOI可以更简单、及时、实时地评估ARDS的预后。关键词:急性呼吸窘迫综合征;高原压力;驱动压力;平均气道压力;高原压力氧合指数;预后
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中华急诊医学杂志
中华急诊医学杂志 Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8629
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine is the only national journal which represents the development of emergency medicine in China. The journal is supervised by China Association of Science and Technology, sponsored by Chinese Medical Association, and co-sponsored by Zhejiang University. The journal publishes original research articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice and research in emergency medicine. The columns include Pre-Hospital Rescue, Emergency Care, Trauma, Resuscitation, Poisoning, Disaster Medicine, Continuing Education, etc. It has a wide coverage in China, and builds up communication with Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan and international emergency medicine circles.
期刊最新文献
The value of ROX index in evaluating the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in patients with COVID-19 The prognosis evaluation of sICAM-1, KL-6 combined with EVLWI in severe pneumonia patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome Analysis of clinical features of 58 patients with severe or critical 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia Construction of 5G intelligent medical service system in novel coronavirus pneumonia prevention and control/ 中华急诊医学杂志 Pediatric Airway Foreign Body Retrieval During the Prevention and Control of 2019 Novel Coronavirus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1