Modelling 3D Topography by Comparing Airborne Lidar Data with Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Photogrammetry Under Multiple Imaging Conditions

O. G. Ajayi, M. Palmer
{"title":"Modelling 3D Topography by Comparing Airborne Lidar Data with Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Photogrammetry Under Multiple Imaging Conditions","authors":"O. G. Ajayi, M. Palmer","doi":"10.14710/GEOPLANNING.6.2.122-138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents the effect of image data sources on the topographic modelling of part of the National Trust site located at Weston-Super-Mare, Bristol, United Kingdom, covering an approximate area of 1.82 hectares. The accuracy of the DEM generated from 1m resolution and 2m resolution LiDAR data together with the accuracy of the DEM generated from the UAV images acquired at different altitudes are analysed using the 1 m LiDAR DEM as reference for the accuracy assessment. Using the NSSDA methodology, the horizontal and vertical accuracy of the DEMs generated from each of the four sources were computed while the paired sample t-test was conducted to ascertain the existence of statistically significant difference between the means of the X, Y, and Z coordinates of the check points. The result obtained shows that with a RMSE of -0.0101499 and horizontal accuracy of -0.175674686m, the planimetric coordinates extracted from 2 m LiDAR DEM were more accurate than the planimetric coordinates extracted from the UAV based DEMs while the UAV based DEMs proved to be more accurate than the 2m LiDAR DEM in terms of altimetric coordinates, though the DEM generated from UAV images acquired at 50 m altitude gave the most accurate result when compared with the vertical accuracy obtained from the DEM generated from UAV images acquired at 30 m and 70 m flight heights. These findings are also consistent with the result of the statistical analysis at 95% confidence interval.","PeriodicalId":30789,"journal":{"name":"Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/GEOPLANNING.6.2.122-138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study presents the effect of image data sources on the topographic modelling of part of the National Trust site located at Weston-Super-Mare, Bristol, United Kingdom, covering an approximate area of 1.82 hectares. The accuracy of the DEM generated from 1m resolution and 2m resolution LiDAR data together with the accuracy of the DEM generated from the UAV images acquired at different altitudes are analysed using the 1 m LiDAR DEM as reference for the accuracy assessment. Using the NSSDA methodology, the horizontal and vertical accuracy of the DEMs generated from each of the four sources were computed while the paired sample t-test was conducted to ascertain the existence of statistically significant difference between the means of the X, Y, and Z coordinates of the check points. The result obtained shows that with a RMSE of -0.0101499 and horizontal accuracy of -0.175674686m, the planimetric coordinates extracted from 2 m LiDAR DEM were more accurate than the planimetric coordinates extracted from the UAV based DEMs while the UAV based DEMs proved to be more accurate than the 2m LiDAR DEM in terms of altimetric coordinates, though the DEM generated from UAV images acquired at 50 m altitude gave the most accurate result when compared with the vertical accuracy obtained from the DEM generated from UAV images acquired at 30 m and 70 m flight heights. These findings are also consistent with the result of the statistical analysis at 95% confidence interval.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过比较机载激光雷达数据和无人机系统(UAS)摄影测量在多种成像条件下的三维地形建模
本研究展示了图像数据源对位于英国布里斯托尔韦斯顿-超级马雷的部分国家信托遗址地形建模的影响,该遗址占地约1.82公顷。以1m分辨率的LiDAR DEM作为精度评估参考,分析了1m分辨率和2m分辨率LiDAR数据生成的DEM的精度以及不同高度无人机图像生成的DEM的精度。使用NSSDA方法,计算从四个来源产生的dem的水平和垂直精度,同时进行配对样本t检验,以确定检查点的X, Y和Z坐标的平均值之间存在统计学显著差异。结果表明:在RMSE为-0.0101499、水平精度为-0.175674686m的情况下,2m LiDAR DEM提取的平面坐标精度高于无人机DEM提取的平面坐标,无人机DEM提取的高程坐标精度高于2m LiDAR DEM;尽管与从30米和70米飞行高度获得的无人机图像生成的DEM相比,在50米高度获得的无人机图像生成的DEM给出了最准确的垂直精度结果。这些结果也与95%置信区间的统计分析结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning
Geoplanning Journal of Geomatics and Planning Earth and Planetary Sciences-Computers in Earth Sciences
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Application of Cellular Automata (CA) and Markov Chain (MC) Model in Urban Growth Prediction: A case of Surat City, Gujarat, India The Effects of Green Open Spaces on Microclimate and Thermal Comfort in Three Integrated Campus in Yogyakarta, Indonesia Assessing Vulnerability of Agriculture to Drought in East Java, Indonesia: Application of GIS and AHP Impact Deforestation on Land Surface Temperature: A Case Study Highland Kundasang, Sabah Shoreline Dynamics in the Very Small Islands of Karimunjawa – Indonesia: A Preliminary Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1