Efficacy of Hyoscine Butylbromide Versus Drotaverine in Relieving Acute Nonspecific Abdominal Pain in Children- A Non - Randomized Trial

Pradip Kumar Paudel, S. Basnet, Merina Shreshtha
{"title":"Efficacy of Hyoscine Butylbromide Versus Drotaverine in Relieving Acute Nonspecific Abdominal Pain in Children- A Non - Randomized Trial","authors":"Pradip Kumar Paudel, S. Basnet, Merina Shreshtha","doi":"10.3126/jnps.v42i1.39773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Acute abdominal pain is a very common complaint for children presenting to the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study was to compare efficacy of hyoscine and drotaverine for relieving acute nonspecific abdominal pain in children presenting to ED.\nMethods: Total of 52 children aged six years to 16 years were enrolled in a non-randomized trial at Paediatric ED of TUTH from Dec 2017 to June 2018, and randomly allocated to drotaverine or hyoscine groups; 26 in each group. Face pain score-revised tool was used to measure the efficacy of the drug. The primary outcome was to measure the reduction of face pain score (Self-reported) by at least 2 / 10 at 60 minutes after ingestion of study intervention. Other outcomes were requirement of rescue analgesia and adverse effects of drugs.\nResults: A total of 20 (77%) in hyoscine and 21 (81%) in drotaverine group responded to oral medication at the end of 60 minutes of oral administration and the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.808). Vomiting was only adverse event present in five (19%) in drotaverine and two (8%) in hyoscine groups, respectively.\n Conclusions: In this single center randomized controlled trial, both hyoscine and drotaverine were found to be equally efficacious for relieving acute non-specific abdominal pain in children.","PeriodicalId":39140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nepal Paediatric Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nepal Paediatric Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jnps.v42i1.39773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acute abdominal pain is a very common complaint for children presenting to the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study was to compare efficacy of hyoscine and drotaverine for relieving acute nonspecific abdominal pain in children presenting to ED. Methods: Total of 52 children aged six years to 16 years were enrolled in a non-randomized trial at Paediatric ED of TUTH from Dec 2017 to June 2018, and randomly allocated to drotaverine or hyoscine groups; 26 in each group. Face pain score-revised tool was used to measure the efficacy of the drug. The primary outcome was to measure the reduction of face pain score (Self-reported) by at least 2 / 10 at 60 minutes after ingestion of study intervention. Other outcomes were requirement of rescue analgesia and adverse effects of drugs. Results: A total of 20 (77%) in hyoscine and 21 (81%) in drotaverine group responded to oral medication at the end of 60 minutes of oral administration and the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.808). Vomiting was only adverse event present in five (19%) in drotaverine and two (8%) in hyoscine groups, respectively. Conclusions: In this single center randomized controlled trial, both hyoscine and drotaverine were found to be equally efficacious for relieving acute non-specific abdominal pain in children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丁溴海莨菪碱与氯他弗林缓解儿童急性非特异性腹痛的疗效——一项非随机试验
简介:急性腹痛是儿童在急诊科(ED)常见的主诉。本研究的目的是比较海莨菪碱和海莨菪碱缓解ED患儿急性非特异性腹痛的疗效。方法:2017年12月至2018年6月,共有52名6岁至16岁的儿童参加了一项非随机试验,随机分配到海莨菪碱组或海莨菪碱组;每组26人。采用面部疼痛评分修正工具测量药物的疗效。主要结果是在摄入研究干预后60分钟测量面部疼痛评分(自我报告)减少至少2 / 10。其他结果为抢救性镇痛需求及药物不良反应。结果:海莨菪碱组20例(77%)、罗他弗林组21例(81%)在口服给药60 min后出现应答,差异无统计学意义(p=0.808)。呕吐是唯一的不良反应,分别有5例(19%)盐酸组和2例(8%)盐酸组。结论:在这项单中心随机对照试验中,发现海莨菪碱和氯他弗林对缓解儿童急性非特异性腹痛同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nepal Paediatric Society
Journal of Nepal Paediatric Society Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mild Encephalopathy with Reversible Splenic Lesions in an Infant with COVID-19 Diagnostic Accuracy of Haematological Scoring System in Paired cord Blood and Peripheral Venous Blood for early Detection of Neonatal Sepsis – A Prospective Analytical Study Effectiveness of Video-Assisted Distraction Technique in Reduction of Pain Among Preschool Children Undergoing Vein Puncture Spectrum of Paediatric Dermatoses in a Private Medical College Behavioural Profile, Linguistic skills, Adaptive Behaviours and Intellectual Functioning of School aged Children with History of Early Language Delay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1