Must Labour Lose?

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY HISTORICAL REFLECTIONS-REFLEXIONS HISTORIQUES Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.3167/HRRH.2021.470206
C. Riley
{"title":"Must Labour Lose?","authors":"C. Riley","doi":"10.3167/HRRH.2021.470206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores Mark Abrams, Richard Rose, and Rita Hinden’s 1960 publication Must Labour Lose? in order to demonstrate that contemporary debates around British identity and political culture are nothing new. The concerns about political, party, and national identity in this book clearly prefigure 2016 debates about Britain, not least because a specific question—how to vote—became a conversation about a broader set of ideals. This article explores how Must Labour Lose? constructed an image of British politics in 1959. It interrogates its silences around racial identity and argues that we must read race into this book and others like it. And it concludes that research like this enables a much wider understanding of the British electorate than simply how they voted.","PeriodicalId":43992,"journal":{"name":"HISTORICAL REFLECTIONS-REFLEXIONS HISTORIQUES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISTORICAL REFLECTIONS-REFLEXIONS HISTORIQUES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/HRRH.2021.470206","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores Mark Abrams, Richard Rose, and Rita Hinden’s 1960 publication Must Labour Lose? in order to demonstrate that contemporary debates around British identity and political culture are nothing new. The concerns about political, party, and national identity in this book clearly prefigure 2016 debates about Britain, not least because a specific question—how to vote—became a conversation about a broader set of ideals. This article explores how Must Labour Lose? constructed an image of British politics in 1959. It interrogates its silences around racial identity and argues that we must read race into this book and others like it. And it concludes that research like this enables a much wider understanding of the British electorate than simply how they voted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
劳工一定会损失吗?
本文探讨了马克·艾布拉姆斯、理查德·罗斯和丽塔·欣登在1960年出版的《劳动必须失败吗?》以证明围绕英国身份和政治文化的当代辩论并不是什么新鲜事。这本书中对政治、政党和国家认同的担忧显然预示着2016年关于英国的辩论,尤其是因为一个具体的问题——如何投票——变成了一场关于更广泛的理想的对话。这篇文章探讨了劳动力如何流失?塑造了1959年英国政治的形象它质疑了关于种族身份的沉默,并认为我们必须在这本书和其他类似的书中读到种族。它的结论是,像这样的研究可以更广泛地了解英国选民,而不仅仅是他们如何投票。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
50.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Founded over thirty years ago, HISTORICAL REFLECTIONS/REFLECTIONS HISTORIQUES has established a well-deserved reputation for publishing high-quality articles of wide-ranging interest. Interdisciplinary and innovative in character, the journal publishes works that explore the terrain of discourse and representation, and the history of religion, art, literature and the social sciences.
期刊最新文献
Book Review Catholicism and Social Policy L'influence des organisations internationales sur les politiques publiques de l'enseignement supérieur au Mexique et la configuration des programmes d’études du diplôme de Droit Transatlantic Legal Networks Reflections on the Circulation of Normative Models and Legal Works in the 1936 Argentine Civil Code Draft on Possession
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1