Morphological-molecular incongruence in Sphagnum majus ssp. majus and ssp. norvegicum

IF 0.8 4区 生物学 Q4 PLANT SCIENCES Bryologist Pub Date : 2022-04-08 DOI:10.1639/0007-2745-125.2.294
Marta Nieto-Lugilde, S. Robinson, Blanka Aguero, Aaron M. Duffy, Karn Imwattana, K. Hassel, K. Flatberg, H. Stenøien, A. Shkurko, V. Fedosov, A. J. Shaw
{"title":"Morphological-molecular incongruence in Sphagnum majus ssp. majus and ssp. norvegicum","authors":"Marta Nieto-Lugilde, S. Robinson, Blanka Aguero, Aaron M. Duffy, Karn Imwattana, K. Hassel, K. Flatberg, H. Stenøien, A. Shkurko, V. Fedosov, A. J. Shaw","doi":"10.1639/0007-2745-125.2.294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Species delimitation is problematic in many plant groups and among the mosses, Sphagnum is one of the more contentious genera because of high levels of morphological variation. The allopolyploid species, Sphagnum majus, comprises one such problematic complex. Two morphologically differentiated but overlapping subspecies have been described. We conducted morphometric and molecular analyses with samples from around the Northern Hemisphere to test for phenotypic and phylogenetic differentiation between the subspecies. Although field collections of the two species can be statistically differentiated morphologically, there is substantial overlap. Genome-scale molecular data do not suggest any differentiation between S. majus ssp. majus and ssp. norvegicum, including samples assigned to the two taxa from sympatric sites. Sequence data from the plastid genome were employed to infer parentage of allopolyploid S. majus. Our results support the hypothesis that S. annulatum is the paternal parent and S. cuspidatum is the maternal parent. We conclude that the morphological differences between them are either plastic responses to habitat heterogeneity or segregating genetic variation within a single taxon. Formal taxonomic recognition of two taxa is not supported by our molecular data.","PeriodicalId":55319,"journal":{"name":"Bryologist","volume":"125 1","pages":"294 - 310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bryologist","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745-125.2.294","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. Species delimitation is problematic in many plant groups and among the mosses, Sphagnum is one of the more contentious genera because of high levels of morphological variation. The allopolyploid species, Sphagnum majus, comprises one such problematic complex. Two morphologically differentiated but overlapping subspecies have been described. We conducted morphometric and molecular analyses with samples from around the Northern Hemisphere to test for phenotypic and phylogenetic differentiation between the subspecies. Although field collections of the two species can be statistically differentiated morphologically, there is substantial overlap. Genome-scale molecular data do not suggest any differentiation between S. majus ssp. majus and ssp. norvegicum, including samples assigned to the two taxa from sympatric sites. Sequence data from the plastid genome were employed to infer parentage of allopolyploid S. majus. Our results support the hypothesis that S. annulatum is the paternal parent and S. cuspidatum is the maternal parent. We conclude that the morphological differences between them are either plastic responses to habitat heterogeneity or segregating genetic variation within a single taxon. Formal taxonomic recognition of two taxa is not supported by our molecular data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
泥鳅的形态-分子不一致。Majus和ssp。norvegicum
摘要在许多植物类群和苔藓类中,物种划分存在问题,由于形态的高度变异,Sphagnum是争议较大的属之一。异源多倍体物种Sphagnum majus包含一个这样的问题复合体。描述了两个形态上不同但重叠的亚种。我们对来自北半球各地的样本进行了形态计量学和分子分析,以测试亚种之间的表型和系统发育差异。虽然这两个物种的野外采集可以在统计学上区分形态,但有大量的重叠。基因组尺度的分子数据未显示大叶葡萄有任何差异。Majus和ssp。norveicum,包括从同域地点分配给两个分类群的样本。利用质体基因组序列数据推断异源多倍体大鼠的亲本关系。我们的研究结果支持了环纹沙棘为父本,虎纹沙棘为母本的假设。我们认为,它们之间的形态差异可能是对生境异质性的可塑性响应,也可能是在单个分类单元内分离的遗传变异。我们的分子数据不支持两个分类群的正式分类识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bryologist
Bryologist 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Bryologist is an international journal devoted to all aspects of bryology and lichenology, and we welcome reviews, research papers and short communications from all members of American Bryological and Lichenological Society (ABLS). We also publish lists of current literature, book reviews and news items about members and event. All back issues of the journal are maintained electronically. The first issue of The Bryologist was published in 1898, with the formation of the Society. Author instructions are available from the journal website and the manuscript submission site, each of which is listed at the ABLS.org website. All submissions to the journal are subject to at least two peer reviews, and both the reviews and the identities of reviewers are treated confidentially. Reviewers are asked to acknowledge possible conflicts of interest and to provide strictly objective assessments of the suitability and scholarly merit of the submissions under review.
期刊最新文献
Ramalea and the new genus Appressodiscus belong in the Ramalinaceae A chemistry overview of the beautiful miniature forest known as mosses Recent literature on lichens—269 Recent literature on bryophytes — 126(2) Common Mosses, Liverworts, and Lichens of Ohio: A Visual Guide – A field companion for the cryptogam naturalist
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1