Development of Attitude Towards Obesity Scale and Obesity Myths Scale

Summaiya Kanwal, Irum Naqvi
{"title":"Development of Attitude Towards Obesity Scale and Obesity Myths Scale","authors":"Summaiya Kanwal, Irum Naqvi","doi":"10.33824/pjpr.2020.35.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Present study aimed to develop and validate the Attitude toward Obesity Scale and Obesity Myths Scale through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and resulting factor structure was confirmed through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Sample of EFA comprised of adults (N = 300) including men (n = 144) and women (n = 156) with the age range of 18 to 36 years (M = 21.53, SD = 2.65). A factor loading of .35 was set as selection criteria for an item in the scale. Using oblique rotation method, EFA presented two meaningful factors for Attitude Toward Obesity Scale and for Obesity Myths Scale. Attitude Toward Obesity Scale revealed two factors named as Lifestyle of Obese (7 items) and Qualities and Characteristics of Obese (7 items). Similarly, for Obesity Myths Scale, two factors named as Weight Control Myths (5 items) and Negative Characterization Myths (5 items) were emerged. For CFA, sample of 430 students including men (n = 180) and women (n = 250) of age range from 19 to 40 years (M = 21.62, SD = 3.13) were taken. CFA confirmed the factor structure of both scales. Alpha reliabilities were ranged from .61 to .67 for Attitude Toward Obesity Scale and from .50 to .57 for Obesity Myths Scale. Overall, both instruments emerged as reliable and valid measures to assess the explicit attitude and myth related to obesity in Pakistani culture.","PeriodicalId":37796,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33824/pjpr.2020.35.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Present study aimed to develop and validate the Attitude toward Obesity Scale and Obesity Myths Scale through Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and resulting factor structure was confirmed through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Sample of EFA comprised of adults (N = 300) including men (n = 144) and women (n = 156) with the age range of 18 to 36 years (M = 21.53, SD = 2.65). A factor loading of .35 was set as selection criteria for an item in the scale. Using oblique rotation method, EFA presented two meaningful factors for Attitude Toward Obesity Scale and for Obesity Myths Scale. Attitude Toward Obesity Scale revealed two factors named as Lifestyle of Obese (7 items) and Qualities and Characteristics of Obese (7 items). Similarly, for Obesity Myths Scale, two factors named as Weight Control Myths (5 items) and Negative Characterization Myths (5 items) were emerged. For CFA, sample of 430 students including men (n = 180) and women (n = 250) of age range from 19 to 40 years (M = 21.62, SD = 3.13) were taken. CFA confirmed the factor structure of both scales. Alpha reliabilities were ranged from .61 to .67 for Attitude Toward Obesity Scale and from .50 to .57 for Obesity Myths Scale. Overall, both instruments emerged as reliable and valid measures to assess the explicit attitude and myth related to obesity in Pakistani culture.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肥胖态度量表和肥胖神话量表的发展
本研究旨在通过探索性因子分析(EFA)开发和验证对肥胖的态度量表和肥胖神话量表,并通过验证性因素分析(CFA)确认由此产生的因子结构。全民教育样本包括年龄在18至36岁之间的成年人(N=300),包括男性(N=144)和女性(N=156)(M=21.53,SD=2.65)。将.35的因子负荷作为量表中某一项目的选择标准。采用倾斜旋转法,EFA为肥胖态度量表和肥胖神话量表提供了两个有意义的因素。肥胖态度量表揭示了肥胖者生活方式(7项)和肥胖者素质特征(7项。同样,对于肥胖神话量表,出现了两个因素,即体重控制神话(5项)和负面表征神话(5项)。在CFA方面,抽取了430名学生的样本,包括年龄在19至40岁之间的男性(n=180)和女性(n=250)(M=21.62,SD=3.13)。CFA确认了两个量表的因子结构。对肥胖的态度量表的阿尔法信度在.61到.67之间,肥胖神话量表的Alpha信度在.50到.57之间。总的来说,这两项工具都是评估巴基斯坦文化中与肥胖有关的明确态度和神话的可靠和有效的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research
Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research (PJPR) is published biannually by the National Institute of Psychology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Pakistan. Its first issue was published in Summer, 1986. Since then two issues, one in summer and the other in winter, have been appearing every year. The Journal provides an outlet for fully documented researches addressing educational, social, developmental, and other areas of Psychology. Preference is given to empirical articles, which deal with the application of psychological knowledge in understanding the problems of national and international importance. The Journal welcomes contributions from all corners. However, participation from the developing countries is eagerly sought in view of its under-representation in research journals published in the West. The PJPR maintains an international editorial board of Consulting Editors belonging to different countries, with expertise in a large number of areas. It employs a double-blind reviewing process i.e., the authors are not identified to reviewers and reviewers are not made known to authors. The contents of PJPR are being abstracted by the Proquest, and in PsycInfo. PJPR is included in the List of Social Sciences Journals recognized by Higher Education Commission, Pakistan.
期刊最新文献
Gratitude Linking the Relationship between Psychological Well-being and Negative Life Events in the Times of Covid-19 within University Students Translation and Adaptation of Short Dark Tetrad (SD4) Development and Validation of Scale of Psychosocial Issues for Patients With Migraine Paranoid Tendencies Scale: Development and Establishment of Psychometric Properties in Young Adults Relationship Between Acculturation Difficulty, Coping Skills, and Psychological Wellbeing Among Young Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1