Study of clinical profile and indications of Permanent Pacemaker Insertion in Nepali population presenting to tertiary care centre in Nepal

IF 0.1 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Nepalese Heart Journal Pub Date : 2019-11-14 DOI:10.3126/njh.v16i2.26317
S. Thapa, R. Gajurel, C. Poudel, H. Shrestha, S. Thapa, S. Devkota, P. Koirala, S. Pathak
{"title":"Study of clinical profile and indications of Permanent Pacemaker Insertion in Nepali population presenting to tertiary care centre in Nepal","authors":"S. Thapa, R. Gajurel, C. Poudel, H. Shrestha, S. Thapa, S. Devkota, P. Koirala, S. Pathak","doi":"10.3126/njh.v16i2.26317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: Although pacemaker implantation has been done regularly in Nepal for the last 20 years, there is no large scale published data of pacemaker implantations. Manmohan Cardiothoracic Vascular and Transplant Centre (MCVTC) have been providing uninterrupted permanent pacemaker implantation services since its inception. This led us an opportunity to report the data regarding permanent pacemaker implantations in MCVTC. \nMethods: Hospital records of all patients who had undergone PPI at MCVTC between Shrawan 2070 – Ashad 2075/ July 2013- June 2018 (5 years) were searched for and all available data were retrospectively analyzed. \nResults: A total of 277 cases underwent PPI at MCVTC in 5 years. Out of these 165 (59.5%) were male with male to female ratio of 1.47. The mean age was 65.82±16.10 years with 3 (1.1%) cases of <20 years of age and almost 70% of cases aged >60 years. Dual chamber units were implanted in 49 (17.7%) cases. Only 13 women (11.6%) received dual chamber pacemaker compared with 36 men (21.8%) (P = 0.029). The most common indication for PPI was complete atrioventricular block 165 (59.6%) followed by sick sinus syndrome 65 (23.5%). Hypertension 84 (30.3%) was the most common co morbidity present. Complication occurred in 5.4% of cases with wound infection as commonest complication and single mortality due to postoperative complications post-RV repair. \nConclusion: Single chamber pacemaker was the most commonly used pacemaker. Dual chamber pacemaker was more common in younger patients. Complete heart block was the most common indication. Permanent pacemaker insertion was effective and relatively safe procedure in MCVTC with few complications.","PeriodicalId":52010,"journal":{"name":"Nepalese Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3126/njh.v16i2.26317","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nepalese Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/njh.v16i2.26317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and Aims: Although pacemaker implantation has been done regularly in Nepal for the last 20 years, there is no large scale published data of pacemaker implantations. Manmohan Cardiothoracic Vascular and Transplant Centre (MCVTC) have been providing uninterrupted permanent pacemaker implantation services since its inception. This led us an opportunity to report the data regarding permanent pacemaker implantations in MCVTC. Methods: Hospital records of all patients who had undergone PPI at MCVTC between Shrawan 2070 – Ashad 2075/ July 2013- June 2018 (5 years) were searched for and all available data were retrospectively analyzed. Results: A total of 277 cases underwent PPI at MCVTC in 5 years. Out of these 165 (59.5%) were male with male to female ratio of 1.47. The mean age was 65.82±16.10 years with 3 (1.1%) cases of <20 years of age and almost 70% of cases aged >60 years. Dual chamber units were implanted in 49 (17.7%) cases. Only 13 women (11.6%) received dual chamber pacemaker compared with 36 men (21.8%) (P = 0.029). The most common indication for PPI was complete atrioventricular block 165 (59.6%) followed by sick sinus syndrome 65 (23.5%). Hypertension 84 (30.3%) was the most common co morbidity present. Complication occurred in 5.4% of cases with wound infection as commonest complication and single mortality due to postoperative complications post-RV repair. Conclusion: Single chamber pacemaker was the most commonly used pacemaker. Dual chamber pacemaker was more common in younger patients. Complete heart block was the most common indication. Permanent pacemaker insertion was effective and relatively safe procedure in MCVTC with few complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼泊尔三级保健中心的尼泊尔人口永久性起搏器插入的临床概况和适应症研究
背景和目的:尽管在过去的20年里,尼泊尔定期进行起搏器植入,但没有大规模公布起搏器植入的数据。曼莫汉心胸血管与移植中心(MCVTC)自成立以来一直提供不间断的永久性起搏器植入服务。这使我们有机会报告MCVTC中永久性起搏器植入的数据。方法:检索Shrawan 2070年至Ashad 2075/2013年7月至2018年6月(5年)期间在MCVTC接受PPI的所有患者的医院记录,并回顾性分析所有可用数据。结果:5年内共有277例患者在MCVTC接受了PPI。其中165人(59.5%)为男性,男女比例为1.47。平均年龄65.82±16.10岁,其中3例(1.1%)60岁。49例(17.7%)患者植入了双腔单元。与36名男性(21.8%)相比,只有13名女性(11.6%)接受了双腔起搏器(P=0.029)。PPI最常见的指征是完全性房室传导阻滞165(59.6%),其次是病态窦房结综合征65(23.5%)。高血压84(30.3%)是最常见的合并症。并发症发生在5.4%的病例中,伤口感染是最常见的并发症,RV修复术后并发症导致的单一死亡。结论:单腔起搏器是最常用的起搏器。双腔起搏器在年轻患者中更常见。完全性心脏传导阻滞是最常见的适应症。在MCVTC中植入永久性起搏器是一种有效且相对安全的手术,并发症很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nepalese Heart Journal
Nepalese Heart Journal CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Patient blood management for cardiovascular surgery: Clinical practice consensus statement Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy in the setting of Urosepsis A Randomized Comparison of Two Doses of Tranexamic Acid in High-Risk Open-Heart Surgery Cardiovascular Disease Risk Profiling among First-Degree Relatives of Premature Coronary Artery Disease Patients Effect of an Educational Intervention for Nursing Personnel on Emergency Inventory and Drugs Checklist of Resuscitation Trolley in a Tertiary Cardiac Center, Kathmandu.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1