Post COVID-19: access to an arts education for all students

Q1 Arts and Humanities Arts Education Policy Review Pub Date : 2022-04-09 DOI:10.1080/10632913.2022.2059730
Ryan M. Hourigan
{"title":"Post COVID-19: access to an arts education for all students","authors":"Ryan M. Hourigan","doi":"10.1080/10632913.2022.2059730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article serves as an introduction to issue number 124 (4). In this issue of Arts Education policy Review, the authors have focused on access, policy, and students who are disadvantaged because of different abilities, poverty, race, class, and other barriers. In addition, the authors represent educators from a cross-section of stakeholders including in-service arts teachers, community engaged therapists, college teacher educators, and schools district administrators. It is hoped that by examining these important topics from the perspective of many stakeholders, we can begin a policy shift toward more equal experiences for all students in the United States.","PeriodicalId":37632,"journal":{"name":"Arts Education Policy Review","volume":"124 1","pages":"228 - 231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arts Education Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2022.2059730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article serves as an introduction to issue number 124 (4). In this issue of Arts Education policy Review, the authors have focused on access, policy, and students who are disadvantaged because of different abilities, poverty, race, class, and other barriers. In addition, the authors represent educators from a cross-section of stakeholders including in-service arts teachers, community engaged therapists, college teacher educators, and schools district administrators. It is hoped that by examining these important topics from the perspective of many stakeholders, we can begin a policy shift toward more equal experiences for all students in the United States.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19后:所有学生都能接受艺术教育
摘要本文是对第124期(4)的介绍。在本期《艺术教育政策评论》中,作者重点关注了由于不同能力、贫困、种族、阶级和其他障碍而处于不利地位的机会、政策和学生。此外,作者代表了来自各利益相关者的教育工作者,包括在职艺术教师、社区参与治疗师、大学教师教育工作者和学区行政人员。希望通过从许多利益相关者的角度审视这些重要话题,我们可以开始向美国所有学生获得更平等体验的政策转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Arts Education Policy Review
Arts Education Policy Review Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Arts Education Policy Review ( AEPR) presents discussion of major policy issues in arts education in the United States and throughout the world. Addressing education in music, visual arts, theatre, and dance, the journal presents a variety of views and emphasizes critical analysis. Its goal is to produce the most comprehensive and rigorous exchange of ideas available on arts education policy. Policy examinations from multiple viewpoints are a valuable resource not only for arts educators, but also for administrators, policy analysts, advocacy groups, parents, and audiences—all those involved in the arts and concerned about their role in education. AEPR focuses on analyses and recommendations focused on policy. The goal of any article should not be description or celebration (although reports of successful programs could be part of an article). Any article focused on a program (or programs) should address why something works or does not work, how it works, how it could work better, and most important, what various policy stakeholders (from teachers to legislators) can do about it. AEPR does not promote individuals, institutions, methods, or products. It does not aim to repeat commonplace ideas. Editors want articles that show originality, probe deeply, and take discussion beyond common wisdom and familiar rhetoric. Articles that merely restate the importance of arts education, call attention to the existence of issues long since addressed, or repeat standard solutions will not be accepted.
期刊最新文献
Recruit, retain, repair: Toward diversity in the North Carolina Music Educators Association The beat goes on? The current presence of music education in Australian public universities Who’s the best? Investigating the NAMM Foundation’s “Best Communities of Music Education” awardees Strengthening music teacher professional development: the P–12 music administrator’s role Arts education in Hong Kong kindergartens: provision of activities and impact of teachers’ demographics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1