Using Evidence-Centered Design to Support the Development of Culturally and Linguistically Sensitive Collaborative Problem-Solving Assessments

IF 1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Testing Pub Date : 2019-01-29 DOI:10.1080/15305058.2018.1543308
M. Oliveri, René Lawless, R. Mislevy
{"title":"Using Evidence-Centered Design to Support the Development of Culturally and Linguistically Sensitive Collaborative Problem-Solving Assessments","authors":"M. Oliveri, René Lawless, R. Mislevy","doi":"10.1080/15305058.2018.1543308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative problem solving (CPS) ranks among the top five most critical skills necessary for college graduates to meet workforce demands (Hart Research Associates, 2015). It is also deemed a critical skill for educational success (Beaver, 2013). It thus deserves more prominence in the suite of courses and subjects assessed in K-16. Such inclusion, however, presents the need for improvements in the conceptualization, design, and analysis of CPS, which challenges us to think differently about assessing the skills than the current focus given to assessing individuals’ substantive knowledge. In this article, we discuss an Evidence-Centered Design approach to assess CPS in a culturally and linguistically diverse educational environment. We demonstrate ways to consider a sociocognitive perspective to conceptualize and model possible linguistic and/or cultural differences between populations along key stages of assessment development including assessment conceptualization and design to help reduce possible construct-irrelevant differences when assessing complex constructs with diverse populations.","PeriodicalId":46615,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Testing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15305058.2018.1543308","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Testing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2018.1543308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Collaborative problem solving (CPS) ranks among the top five most critical skills necessary for college graduates to meet workforce demands (Hart Research Associates, 2015). It is also deemed a critical skill for educational success (Beaver, 2013). It thus deserves more prominence in the suite of courses and subjects assessed in K-16. Such inclusion, however, presents the need for improvements in the conceptualization, design, and analysis of CPS, which challenges us to think differently about assessing the skills than the current focus given to assessing individuals’ substantive knowledge. In this article, we discuss an Evidence-Centered Design approach to assess CPS in a culturally and linguistically diverse educational environment. We demonstrate ways to consider a sociocognitive perspective to conceptualize and model possible linguistic and/or cultural differences between populations along key stages of assessment development including assessment conceptualization and design to help reduce possible construct-irrelevant differences when assessing complex constructs with diverse populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用以证据为中心的设计来支持文化和语言敏感的协作问题解决评估的发展
协作解决问题(CPS)是大学毕业生满足劳动力需求所需的五大关键技能之一(Hart Research Associates, 2015)。它也被认为是教育成功的关键技能(Beaver, 2013)。因此,在K-16评估的课程和科目中,它应该得到更突出的地位。然而,这样的纳入提出了改进CPS的概念化、设计和分析的需要,这挑战了我们对评估技能的不同思考,而不是目前对评估个人实质性知识的关注。在本文中,我们讨论了在文化和语言多样化的教育环境中评估CPS的循证设计方法。我们展示了在评估发展的关键阶段考虑社会认知视角概念化和建模人群之间可能的语言和/或文化差异的方法,包括评估概念化和设计,以帮助在评估不同人群的复杂构念时减少可能的构念无关的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Testing
International Journal of Testing SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Combining Mokken Scale Analysis with and rasch measurement theory to explore differences in measurement quality between subgroups Examining the construct validity of the MIDUS version of the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ) Where nonresponse is at its loudest: Cross-country and individual differences in item nonresponse across the PISA 2018 student questionnaire The choice between cognitive diagnosis and item response theory: A case study from medical education Beyond group comparisons: Accounting for intersectional sources of bias in international survey measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1