Early Mobilization of Patients Receiving Vasoactive Drugs in Critical Care Units: A Systematic Review

IF 0.5 Q4 REHABILITATION Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2020-04-27 DOI:10.1097/JAT.0000000000000140
Prasobh Jacob, P. Surendran, Muhamed Aleef E M, T. Papasavvas, Reshma Praveen, Narasimman Swaminathan, Fiona Milligan
{"title":"Early Mobilization of Patients Receiving Vasoactive Drugs in Critical Care Units: A Systematic Review","authors":"Prasobh Jacob, P. Surendran, Muhamed Aleef E M, T. Papasavvas, Reshma Praveen, Narasimman Swaminathan, Fiona Milligan","doi":"10.1097/JAT.0000000000000140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Mobilization is feasible, safe, and beneficial to patients admitted to critical care units. Vasoactive therapy appears to be one of the most common barriers to early mobilization. Many recent publications have studied the safety and feasibility of mobilizing patients with these vasoactive drugs. The aim of this review was to synthesize the prevailing evidence pertaining to mobilizing patients receiving vasoactive drugs. Methods: The protocol was developed and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019127448). A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDRO), Cochrane Central, and Embase (through Cochrane) for original research, including case studies and consensus guidelines. PRISMA guidelines were used to conduct and report this review. The included articles were appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale independently and a consensus reached by 3 reviewers. Results and Conclusion: Evidence determining specific doses of vasoactive drugs that would allow safe mobilization of patients in critical care is lacking. The criteria that have been used to determine the eligibility to mobilize patients on vasoactive drugs have not been consistent.","PeriodicalId":42472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000140","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Purpose: Mobilization is feasible, safe, and beneficial to patients admitted to critical care units. Vasoactive therapy appears to be one of the most common barriers to early mobilization. Many recent publications have studied the safety and feasibility of mobilizing patients with these vasoactive drugs. The aim of this review was to synthesize the prevailing evidence pertaining to mobilizing patients receiving vasoactive drugs. Methods: The protocol was developed and registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019127448). A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDRO), Cochrane Central, and Embase (through Cochrane) for original research, including case studies and consensus guidelines. PRISMA guidelines were used to conduct and report this review. The included articles were appraised using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale independently and a consensus reached by 3 reviewers. Results and Conclusion: Evidence determining specific doses of vasoactive drugs that would allow safe mobilization of patients in critical care is lacking. The criteria that have been used to determine the eligibility to mobilize patients on vasoactive drugs have not been consistent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重症监护室接受血管活性药物治疗患者的早期动员:一项系统综述
目的:对入住重症监护病房的患者来说,动员是可行、安全且有益的。血管活性治疗似乎是早期活动最常见的障碍之一。许多最近的出版物研究了这些血管活性药物动员患者的安全性和可行性。本综述的目的是综合有关动员患者接受血管活性药物的主要证据。方法:在PROSPERO (CRD42019127448)上开发并注册该协议。通过PubMed、物理治疗证据数据库(PEDRO)、Cochrane Central和Embase(通过Cochrane)对原始研究进行了全面的文献检索,包括案例研究和共识指南。采用PRISMA指南进行和报告本次审查。纳入的文章采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行独立评价,并由3位评论者达成共识。结果和结论:确定血管活性药物的特定剂量,使危重症患者安全活动的证据不足。用于确定是否有资格动员患者使用血管活性药物的标准并不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Creating Value Together: A Triad of Clinicians, Administrators, and Researchers Overcoming Barriers to Unique Valuation of Acute Care Physical Therapy Where Do We Go From Here? An Editor's Update on the Journal Exploring the Addition of Simulation-Based Learning Experiences to Prepare Student Physical Therapist Assistants for Inpatient Clinical Experience Mobility Checklist for Patients With Advanced Heart Failure and a Femoral Intra-aortic Balloon Pump
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1