A urological urgent assessment unit service evaluation in a United Kingdom hospital

Emma L. White MSc, RN
{"title":"A urological urgent assessment unit service evaluation in a United Kingdom hospital","authors":"Emma L. White MSc, RN","doi":"10.1111/ijun.12373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>What are the experiences, evaluations and satisfaction levels of service users requiring ambulatory, urgent and emergency urological care who attended a newly implemented urology assessment unit (UAU) in a National Health Service (NHS) hospital in the United Kingdom (UK)? A UAU within an acute care setting was set up for ambulatory, emergency and urgent urological care. The objectives of the unit was to improve patient satisfaction, divert patients from the emergency department, provide an area for early specialist review, allow earlier discharge from hospital and prevent unnecessary admissions to hospital. The aim of this service evaluation (SE) was to evaluate the service user experience and satisfaction when attending this unit. Surgical assessment units are well-supported in terms of reducing admissions and diverting patients from emergency departments, however, there is little published research regarding units specifically for urology. Important sources involved in urological care delivery and services advocate their implementation but there remains very little published evidence to support this. Opinion pieces and short case studies have yielded positive results. No research was found that has looked into patient satisfaction, experience and feedback of these units in any detail. A SE was conducted involving sending a postal questionnaire to a random selection of 150 patients who attended the UAU. The questionnaire contained a set of 13 Likert-style questions with additional free text open-ended questions for provision of further clarification and service user expression. Questions around age, reason for admission and accessibility to the UAU were also included. The Likert-style and demographic questions were analysed by quantifying responses to percentages and the open-ended responses were analysed thematically. The questionnaire response rate of 51% was seen from 76 respondents and these were most commonly over 71 years old (47%). The most common reasons for attending were urinary retention, infection and post-operative urological problems. Of these, 22% did not need to see a doctor and were treated and discharged by the urology nurse practitioner. The care on the UAU was rated highly and generally found to be preferable over the care provided by emergency departments (ED) and general practitioners (GP) family doctors and patients were grateful to avoid being admitted to hospital. Patients appreciated easy access to specialist care and knowledge. Good levels of communication were highlighted as important. Open-ended response themes included; nursing, doctors, environment, access, communication, specialist access, preventing ED attendances and hospital admissions. Participants rated the care from the nurses and doctors highly; there was a focus on appreciating seeing a specialist directly and avoiding admission to hospital. They were satisfied with being able to avoid attending their GP or ED, and generally preferred the unit over these routes of care. There are multiple areas within emergency and urgent urological care that require further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50281,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","volume":"17 3","pages":"236-245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urological Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijun.12373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What are the experiences, evaluations and satisfaction levels of service users requiring ambulatory, urgent and emergency urological care who attended a newly implemented urology assessment unit (UAU) in a National Health Service (NHS) hospital in the United Kingdom (UK)? A UAU within an acute care setting was set up for ambulatory, emergency and urgent urological care. The objectives of the unit was to improve patient satisfaction, divert patients from the emergency department, provide an area for early specialist review, allow earlier discharge from hospital and prevent unnecessary admissions to hospital. The aim of this service evaluation (SE) was to evaluate the service user experience and satisfaction when attending this unit. Surgical assessment units are well-supported in terms of reducing admissions and diverting patients from emergency departments, however, there is little published research regarding units specifically for urology. Important sources involved in urological care delivery and services advocate their implementation but there remains very little published evidence to support this. Opinion pieces and short case studies have yielded positive results. No research was found that has looked into patient satisfaction, experience and feedback of these units in any detail. A SE was conducted involving sending a postal questionnaire to a random selection of 150 patients who attended the UAU. The questionnaire contained a set of 13 Likert-style questions with additional free text open-ended questions for provision of further clarification and service user expression. Questions around age, reason for admission and accessibility to the UAU were also included. The Likert-style and demographic questions were analysed by quantifying responses to percentages and the open-ended responses were analysed thematically. The questionnaire response rate of 51% was seen from 76 respondents and these were most commonly over 71 years old (47%). The most common reasons for attending were urinary retention, infection and post-operative urological problems. Of these, 22% did not need to see a doctor and were treated and discharged by the urology nurse practitioner. The care on the UAU was rated highly and generally found to be preferable over the care provided by emergency departments (ED) and general practitioners (GP) family doctors and patients were grateful to avoid being admitted to hospital. Patients appreciated easy access to specialist care and knowledge. Good levels of communication were highlighted as important. Open-ended response themes included; nursing, doctors, environment, access, communication, specialist access, preventing ED attendances and hospital admissions. Participants rated the care from the nurses and doctors highly; there was a focus on appreciating seeing a specialist directly and avoiding admission to hospital. They were satisfied with being able to avoid attending their GP or ED, and generally preferred the unit over these routes of care. There are multiple areas within emergency and urgent urological care that require further research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国某医院泌尿科急诊评估单位服务评估
在英国国民保健服务(NHS)医院新设立的泌尿科评估单元(UAU),需要门诊、紧急和急诊泌尿科护理的服务使用者的经历、评价和满意度如何?在急症护理机构内设立了一个UAU,用于门诊、急诊和紧急泌尿科护理。该单位的目标是提高病人的满意度,将病人从急诊科转移出去,提供一个早期专家检查的地方,允许尽早出院,防止不必要的住院。本服务评估(SE)的目的是评估本单位的服务用户体验和满意度。外科评估单元在减少住院率和转移急诊科患者方面得到了很好的支持,然而,关于泌尿外科单元的研究很少发表。参与泌尿科护理和服务的重要来源提倡实施,但仍然很少有公开的证据支持这一点。评论文章和简短的案例研究产生了积极的结果。没有研究发现,已经调查了病人的满意度,经验和反馈这些单位的任何细节。随机抽取了150名参加UAU的患者,并向他们发送了一份邮寄问卷。问卷包含一组13个李克特式的问题,还有额外的自由文本开放式问题,以提供进一步的澄清和服务用户的表达。有关年龄、入学原因和进入UAU的问题也包括在内。李克特式和人口统计学问题通过对百分比的量化回答进行分析,开放式回答进行主题分析。76名受访者的问卷回复率为51%,这些受访者大多超过71岁(47%)。最常见的原因是尿潴留、感染和术后泌尿系统问题。其中,22%不需要看医生,由泌尿科执业护士治疗和出院。UAU的护理得到了很高的评价,通常被认为比急诊科(ED)和全科医生(GP)家庭医生提供的护理更好,患者对避免住院表示感谢。病人们希望能方便地获得专业护理和知识。良好的沟通水平被强调为重要的。开放式回应主题包括;护理、医生、环境、通道、沟通、专家通道、预防急诊和住院。参与者对护士和医生的护理给予了很高的评价;重点是欣赏直接看专家,避免住院。他们对能够避免去看全科医生或急诊科感到满意,并且通常更喜欢单位而不是这些路线的护理。急诊和紧急泌尿科护理中有多个领域需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Urological Nursing is an international peer-reviewed Journal for all nurses, non-specialist and specialist, who care for individuals with urological disorders. It is relevant for nurses working in a variety of settings: inpatient care, outpatient care, ambulatory care, community care, operating departments and specialist clinics. The Journal covers the whole spectrum of urological nursing skills and knowledge. It supports the publication of local issues of relevance to a wider international community to disseminate good practice. The International Journal of Urological Nursing is clinically focused, evidence-based and welcomes contributions in the following clinical and non-clinical areas: -General Urology- Continence care- Oncology- Andrology- Stoma care- Paediatric urology- Men’s health- Uro-gynaecology- Reconstructive surgery- Clinical audit- Clinical governance- Nurse-led services- Reflective analysis- Education- Management- Research- Leadership The Journal welcomes original research papers, practice development papers and literature reviews. It also invites shorter papers such as case reports, critical commentary, reflective analysis and reports of audit, as well as contributions to regular sections such as the media reviews section. The International Journal of Urological Nursing supports the development of academic writing within the specialty and particularly welcomes papers from young researchers or practitioners who are seeking to build a publication profile.
期刊最新文献
The effects of continuous care utilizing rational emotive therapy on prostate cancer patients Knowledge and practices of nurses working in urology clinics on fluid–electrolyte monitoring and management Postoperative nursing in robot-assisted urologic surgery: Are there any platform-based differences? Adherence and uncertainty during rehabilitation for urinary incontinence: Validation of a scale Assessing the reliability and usefulness of ChatGPT responses on intermittent catheterization queries: A critical analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1