Evaluating otolith increment deposition rates in bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) and yellowfin tuna (T. albacares) tagged in the Atlantic Ocean: Suppl. Fig. 2

IF 0.8 4区 农林科学 Q3 FISHERIES Fishery Bulletin Pub Date : 2022-12-22 DOI:10.7755/fb.121.1.s2
K. Krusic-Golub, L. Ailloud
{"title":"Evaluating otolith increment deposition rates in bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) and yellowfin tuna (T. albacares) tagged in the Atlantic Ocean: Suppl. Fig. 2","authors":"K. Krusic-Golub, L. Ailloud","doi":"10.7755/fb.121.1.s2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"— A recent Atlantic- wide tag- recapture experiment run by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas was an opportunity to directly validate otolith increment deposition rates for bigeye tuna ( Thunnus obesus ) and yellowfin tuna ( T. albacares ) in the region. Age and time at liberty were estimated by using annual and daily increment counts for sectioned otoliths from sampled fish previously injected with oxy- tetracycline and later recaptured. The use of annual increment counts resulted in g reater age estimates than those from daily increment counts for fish >55 cm straight fork length (SFL). Use of daily increment counts led to underestima- tion of time at liberty for fish >55 cm SFL at recovery, compared with known times at liberty. In contrast, predictions based on annual increment counts are accurate across the entire size range of sampled fish, validating the notion that increments are deposited annually. We therefore recommend that counting annual increments be the preferred method for aging yellowfin and bigeye tuna from the Atlantic Ocean and that the use of daily increments for aging be limited to young of the year. Aging fish accurately is important for stock assess- ments in which data on age and growth play an increasingly essential role in examining population dynamics. It is crucial that otolith reading practices and analyses based on age data reflect the most up- to- date recommendations for age estimation.","PeriodicalId":50442,"journal":{"name":"Fishery Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fishery Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7755/fb.121.1.s2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

— A recent Atlantic- wide tag- recapture experiment run by the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas was an opportunity to directly validate otolith increment deposition rates for bigeye tuna ( Thunnus obesus ) and yellowfin tuna ( T. albacares ) in the region. Age and time at liberty were estimated by using annual and daily increment counts for sectioned otoliths from sampled fish previously injected with oxy- tetracycline and later recaptured. The use of annual increment counts resulted in g reater age estimates than those from daily increment counts for fish >55 cm straight fork length (SFL). Use of daily increment counts led to underestima- tion of time at liberty for fish >55 cm SFL at recovery, compared with known times at liberty. In contrast, predictions based on annual increment counts are accurate across the entire size range of sampled fish, validating the notion that increments are deposited annually. We therefore recommend that counting annual increments be the preferred method for aging yellowfin and bigeye tuna from the Atlantic Ocean and that the use of daily increments for aging be limited to young of the year. Aging fish accurately is important for stock assess- ments in which data on age and growth play an increasingly essential role in examining population dynamics. It is crucial that otolith reading practices and analyses based on age data reflect the most up- to- date recommendations for age estimation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估大西洋大眼金枪鱼(Thunnus obesus)和黄鳍金枪鱼(T. albacares)标记的耳石增量沉积率:供应。图2
最近,大西洋金枪鱼保护国际委员会在大西洋范围内进行了一项标签重捕实验,这是一个直接验证该地区大眼金枪鱼(Thunnus obesus)和黄鳍金枪鱼(T. albacares)耳石增加沉积率的机会。年龄和自由时间是通过对取样鱼的耳石切片进行年度和每日增量计数来估计的,这些耳石以前注射过氧四环素,后来重新捕获。对于直叉长度为55 cm的鱼,使用年增量计数比使用日增量计数得到的年龄估计值更高。与已知的自由时间相比,每日增量计数的使用导致了鱼在恢复时的自由时间被低估。相比之下,基于年增量计数的预测在取样鱼类的整个尺寸范围内都是准确的,这证实了增量每年沉积的概念。因此,我们建议将计算年增量作为大西洋黄鳍金枪鱼和大眼金枪鱼老化的首选方法,并将每日增量的使用限制在一年中年轻的金枪鱼。鱼类的准确老化对种群评估很重要,因为年龄和生长数据在检验种群动态方面起着越来越重要的作用。至关重要的是,耳石阅读实践和基于年龄数据的分析反映了年龄估计的最新建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fishery Bulletin
Fishery Bulletin 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
76
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: The quarterly Fishery Bulletin is one of the oldest and most respected fisheries journals in the world. It has been an official publication of the U.S. Government since 1881, under various titles, and is the U.S. counterpart to other highly regarded governmental fisheries science publications. It publishes original research and interpretative articles in all scientific fields that bear on marine fisheries and marine mammal science.
期刊最新文献
Reevaluating fecundity of white perch (Morone americana) in Chesapeake Bay with modern stereological techniques An identification guide to the larvae of lanternfishes (Teleostei: Myctophidae) from the Subtropical Convergence: subfamilies Lampanyctinae and Notolychninae An identification guide to the larvae of lanternfishes (Teleostei: Myctophidae) from the Subtropical Convergence: subfamilies Lampanyctinae and Notolychninae: Suppl. Table Age, growth parameters, and reproductive characteristics of the sharpspine skate (Okamejei acutispina) in the East China Sea Chemical clocks: using otolith geochemistry to enhance estimation of age and growth of white hake (Urophycis tenuis): Suppl. Materials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1